Letter to Editor
BibTex RIS Cite

MRI and Anesthesia & Sedation

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 60 - 61, 15.08.2017
https://doi.org/10.25000/acem.319865

Abstract

In 1945 Broch & Purcell described as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. It was

used for chemical and biochemical analyses for long years. It was widely

used in medical applications after Lauterbur et al. ‘s study in 1973 (1).

The primary screening method for breast cancer is mammography as

known. It is the only method that positively affects survival. But its

sensitivity and specificity is not 100% and it can be an inadequate method

at some ages. Studies showed that: MRI imaging added mammography

increased success rates but increased false positivity rates can cause some

unnecessary invasive procedures. Although these breast MRI is widely used

for screening, diagnosis and staging (2).

More than 80 million MRI is worldwide applied yearly. Claustrophobia rates

are between 1-15% and more than 2 million breast MRI application is

interrupted for the necessitation of sedation (3). Melendez et al. noticed

that rate around 30%. Also 3-5% of these cases were interrupted due to

the sedation necessitation. Anxiety and claustrophobia can cause sequence

repeating, procedure cancellation and important time and labor loss.

References

  • 1. Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard M. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 1946;69:127.
  • 2. Menon DK, Peden CJ, Hall AS, Sargentoni J, Whitwam JG. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Part I: Physical principles, applications, safety aspects. Anaesthesia. 1992 Mar;47(3):240-55. Review.
  • 3. Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Nov 1;16(20):1-30. eCollection 2016.
  • 4. Enders J, Zimmermann E, Rief M, Martus P, Klingebiel R, Asbach P, Klessen C, Diederichs G, Bengner T, Teichgräber U, Hamm B, Dewey M. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Imaging. 2011 Feb 10;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-11-4.
  • 5. Meléndez JC1, McCrank E. Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA 1993;270:745-7.
  • 6. Munn Z, Jordan Z. Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Dec;11(4):265-74. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12045.
  • 7. Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ, Mauras N, Beck RW, Marzelli MJ, et al. High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner–the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:181–6.
  • 8. Metzner J, Posner KL, Lam MS, Domino KB. Closed claims' analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2011;25:263-76.
Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 60 - 61, 15.08.2017
https://doi.org/10.25000/acem.319865

Abstract

References

  • 1. Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard M. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 1946;69:127.
  • 2. Menon DK, Peden CJ, Hall AS, Sargentoni J, Whitwam JG. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Part I: Physical principles, applications, safety aspects. Anaesthesia. 1992 Mar;47(3):240-55. Review.
  • 3. Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Nov 1;16(20):1-30. eCollection 2016.
  • 4. Enders J, Zimmermann E, Rief M, Martus P, Klingebiel R, Asbach P, Klessen C, Diederichs G, Bengner T, Teichgräber U, Hamm B, Dewey M. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Imaging. 2011 Feb 10;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-11-4.
  • 5. Meléndez JC1, McCrank E. Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA 1993;270:745-7.
  • 6. Munn Z, Jordan Z. Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Dec;11(4):265-74. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12045.
  • 7. Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ, Mauras N, Beck RW, Marzelli MJ, et al. High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner–the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:181–6.
  • 8. Metzner J, Posner KL, Lam MS, Domino KB. Closed claims' analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2011;25:263-76.
There are 8 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Letter to Editor
Authors

Asim Esen

Muhittin Calim

Huseyin Kadioglu

Publication Date August 15, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

Vancouver Esen A, Calim M, Kadioglu H. MRI and Anesthesia & Sedation. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2017;2(2):60-1.