Case Report
BibTex RIS Cite

A rare case of atypical accessory bile duct: Luschka

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 75 - 77, 22.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.804896

Abstract

A 56-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with indigestion and abdominal bloating after eating. During routine surgery, a cystic artery, cystic duct, and an additional second duct were detected in the area of the Calot’s triangle. Considering that this channel is the accessory bile duct entering the gallbladder during dissection, this structure, cystic duct and cystic artery were double clipped and cholecystectomy was completed. Bile duct injury is a serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Bile leakage from accessory duct of Luschka is very rare. Anomalies of the bile ducts are common due to complex embryological stages of development. We wanted to share the presence of the atypical localized luschka canal that we encountered during gallbladder surgery. In our case, during the dissection of the Calot’s triangle, luschka was considered the main bile duct first, and after extensive dissection, it was concluded that this structure was luschka. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations, we recommend that the cystic artery and Canal be clipped after extensive dissection of the Calot’s triangle or even the hepatic triangle in experienced hands

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

References

  • Senapathi A, Wolfe JH. Accessory cystic duct -an operative hazard. J R SocMed 1984; 77: 845–6.
  • Spanos CP, Syrakos T. Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka [subvesical duct]: a review. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2006; 391: 441-7.
  • Parampalli U, Helme S, Asal G, et al. Sinha Accessory cystic duct identification in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Grand Rounds 2008; 8: 40-2.
  • Aoki T, Imamura H, Sakamoto Y, et al. Bile duct of Luschka connecting with the cystohepaticduct: The importance of cholangio graphy during surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 694-6.
  • Frakes JT, Bradley SJ. Endoscopic stent placement for biliary leak from an accessory duct of Luchska after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39: 90-2.
  • Strasberg SM, Hetl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopy cholecystectomy. J AmCollSurg. 1995; 180: 101-25
  • Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, et al. Bile duct injuries 1989-1993. ArchSurg. 1996; 131: 382-8
  • Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchon T, et al. What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Endoscopy 1997; 29: 341-8. 21.
  • Mergener K, Strobel JC, Suhocki P, et al. The role of ERCP in the diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 527-31.
  • Stewart L, Way LW. Laparoscopic bile ductinjuries: timing of surgical repair does not influence success rate. A multi variate analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes. HPB [Oxford] 2009; 11: 516–22.
  • Bektas H, Schrem H, Winny M, et al. Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1119- 27.
Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 75 - 77, 22.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.804896

Abstract

Project Number

-

References

  • Senapathi A, Wolfe JH. Accessory cystic duct -an operative hazard. J R SocMed 1984; 77: 845–6.
  • Spanos CP, Syrakos T. Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka [subvesical duct]: a review. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2006; 391: 441-7.
  • Parampalli U, Helme S, Asal G, et al. Sinha Accessory cystic duct identification in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Grand Rounds 2008; 8: 40-2.
  • Aoki T, Imamura H, Sakamoto Y, et al. Bile duct of Luschka connecting with the cystohepaticduct: The importance of cholangio graphy during surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 694-6.
  • Frakes JT, Bradley SJ. Endoscopic stent placement for biliary leak from an accessory duct of Luchska after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39: 90-2.
  • Strasberg SM, Hetl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopy cholecystectomy. J AmCollSurg. 1995; 180: 101-25
  • Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, et al. Bile duct injuries 1989-1993. ArchSurg. 1996; 131: 382-8
  • Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchon T, et al. What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Endoscopy 1997; 29: 341-8. 21.
  • Mergener K, Strobel JC, Suhocki P, et al. The role of ERCP in the diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 527-31.
  • Stewart L, Way LW. Laparoscopic bile ductinjuries: timing of surgical repair does not influence success rate. A multi variate analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes. HPB [Oxford] 2009; 11: 516–22.
  • Bektas H, Schrem H, Winny M, et al. Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1119- 27.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Case Report
Authors

Yavuz Pirhan 0000-0002-8234-6739

Havva Keser 0000-0003-1827-1039

Project Number -
Publication Date January 22, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

AMA Pirhan Y, Keser H. A rare case of atypical accessory bile duct: Luschka. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. January 2021;3(1):75-77. doi:10.38053/acmj.804896

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


The indexes of the journal's are;

18596


asos-index.png

f9ab67f.png

WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png

      logo-large-explore.png

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

index_copernicus.jpg


84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg





The platforms of the journal's are;

COPE.jpg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.png

ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU






The
 
indexes/platforms of the journal are;

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 


EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.

Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"