Introduction: To determine whether close follow-up by telephone calls is of benefit in Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication rates. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized into two groups as patients who were followed up by telephone calls (TFG) and those who were not (NTFG; controls). Patients in the TFG group were called every 3 days for the 14 days during Hp treatment and were supported for treatment. Patients in the NTFG group were explained the treatment protocol in detail at treatment initiation and were instructed to return for a follow-up visit 4 weeks after treatment end. The latter group was not given support via telephone calls. All patients were examined by fecal HP antigen assay 4 weeks after eradication treatment. Results: The 242 patients’ age range was 19-82 and their mean age was 45.01 ± 14.6 years. Of the patients, 52.1% (n=126) were women and 47.9% (n=116) were men. At treatment initiation and during medical examinations, 6.2% (n=15) of the patients voluntarily withdrew from the study. Treatment was discontinued in 5.8% (n=14) during the course of treatment due to side effects. Of the remaining 213 patients, 108 were randomized to the TFG group and 105 to the NTFG group. Eradication was achieved in 80% (n=84) and could not be achieved in 20% (n=21) of the patients in NTFG. Eradication was achieved in 91.6% (n=99) and could not be achieved in 8.4% (n=9) of the patients in TGF (p<0.001). Conclusions: Supportive close telephone follow up significantly positively contributed to the Hp eradication success.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | January 22, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 1 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"