Aim: To characterize the patient groups referred to the ophthalmology clinic from the pediatrics clinic and to determine the frequency of the findings.
Material and Method: The patients consulted to Balıkesir University Eye Clinic by the Pediatrics Clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into rule-out and ocular symptom groups. Reasons for consultation and ocular findings were recorded.
Results: The mean age of 116 patients included in the study was 8.04±4.11 years. Of the patients included in the study, 75 (64.7%) rule-out 41 (35.3%) were in the ocular symptom group. 41 (54.7%) patients in the rule-out group were those who applied for headaches and requested an examination of the fundus and optic disc. Papilledema was detected in 7 (17.1%) patients with headache. Of the patients in the ocular symptom group, 11 (26.8%) were consulted for ocular trauma, 11 (26.8%) for red eye, and 7 (17.1%) for preseptal/orbital cellulitis. Preseptal cellulitis was detected in 4 (57.1%) patients consulted for preseptal/orbital cellulitis. Ocular findings were detected in 10 (91%) patients consulted for trauma. Conjunctivitis was detected in 9 (81.8%) patients who were consulted with red eyes.
Conclusion: In the pediatric age group, ophthalmic consultation is mainly performed due to rule-out. The most common reason is the examination of the fundus of the eye due to headache. It is crucial for pediatric age groups to consult an ophthalmologist by performing an eye and vision examination by a pediatrician in terms of early diagnosis and treatment.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 27, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"