Aims: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of lobectomy and pneumonectomy operations performed due to lung cancer in individuals aged 70 and above, and to analyze the factors influencing these outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective study covers lobectomy and pneumonectomy operations performed on 103 lung cancer patients over the age of 70, from January 2018 to December 2021. A dataset was created including patients’ demographic information, smoking status, comorbidities, results of pulmonary function tests and echocardiography, preoperative complete blood count, and serum albumin levels, and these data were analyzed.
Results: The average age of the patients was 73.3; 83.5% were male, and 16.5% were female. The complication rate was 47.6%, and the 30-day surgical mortality rate was 8.7%. Patients with a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score had higher rates of complications and mortality (p=0.015). Low preoperative serum albumin (p=0.017) and hemoglobin (p=0.026) levels were associated with an increased risk of complications. Postoperative outcomes between Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy were found to be similar.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates that in elderly lung cancer surgery, comorbidities and preoperative nutritional status are decisive factors affecting surgical outcomes. Preoperative albumin and hemoglobin levels emerge as significant indicators in assessing the risk of postoperative complications. VATS and thoracotomy are surgical techniques with similar safety and efficacy profiles.
The study was carried out with the permission of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 27.04.2023, Decision No: 2023/514/248/16).
The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
None
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Thoracic Surgery |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 28, 2024 |
Submission Date | January 27, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | March 14, 2024 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 6 Issue: 3 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"