Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare frailty status in non-geriatric hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and to assess whether there is a difference between frail and non-frail patients in HD and PD patients.
Methods: 28 PD and 28 HD patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty status, including questions on cognition, general health status, addiction, social support, medication, nutrition, depression and sphincter continence, and a physical test assessing standing and walking.
Results: The mean age was 51.3+9.6 years and 24 (43%) of the individuals were female. There was no difference between HD and PD patients in terms of EFS score. Twelve (43%) of HD patients and 10 (36%) of PD patients were found to be frail (p=0.784). There was a positive correlation between age and EFS score in both HD and PD patients (r=0.896, p<0.001, r=0.661, p<0.001, respectively). In HD patients, there was a correlation between the EFS score and HbA1c (r=0.570, p=0.002). In HD patients, frail patients were older, had lower creatinine values and higher HbA1c levels (p<0.001, p=0.008, and p=0.006, respectively), while in PD patients, frail patients were older (p<0.001).
Conclusion: There was no difference in frailty between HD and PD patients. It should be noted that frailty is common in nongeriatric dialysis patients. Measuring frailty may help clinicians to identify vulnerable patients and intervene early to mitigate adverse outcomes.
The study protocol was approved by the Malatya Turgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee on July 10, 2024 (Approval number: 45).
None
We thank all the participants who took part in this study.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Nefroloji |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 21, 2025 |
Submission Date | February 25, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | March 18, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"