Diş Hekimliğinde Biyoaktif Camların Kullanımı

Year 2023, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 150 - 157, 18.01.2023

Ece Uçar Başol , Işıl Çekiç Nagaş

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1182114

Abstract

Uzun yıllardır ortopedide kullanılan biyoaktif camlar son yıllarda diş hekimliğinde de geniş uygulama alanı bulmuştur. Biyoinert malzemelerin fibröz kapsüllenmesini engelleyebileceği düşünülerek geliştirilen biyoaktif camlar vücut sıvıları ile temasında hidroksiapatit çökelten malzemelerdir. Ayrıca gen ekspresyonu ve anjiyogenezi uyarması, antiseptik etkisi gibi özellikleri biyoaktif camlara olan ilgiyi arttırmıştır. Diş hekimliğinde; kemik rejenerasyonunda, mineralize edici ajan olarak ve hava aşındırmasında kullanılmaktadır. Aynı zamanda pulpa kaplama materyali, restoratif materyallere katkı maddesi ve implant kaplama materyali olarak da kullanım alanı bulmuştur. Bu derleme günümüzde diş hekimliğinde biyoaktif camların kullanım alanları ile ilgili güncel bir bakış açısı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

Bioaktif cam, dental materyaller, diş hekimliği.

Utilization of Bioactive Glasses in Dentistry

Abstract

Bioactive glasses, which have been used in orthopedics for many years, have also found wide application in dentistry in recent years. Developed with the thought that bioinert materials can prevent fibrous encapsulation, bioactive glasses are materials that precipitate hydroxyapatite in contact with body fluids. In addition, properties such as gene expression and stimulation of angiogenesis and antiseptic effects have increased the interest in bioactive glasses. In dentistry; it is used in bone regeneration, as a mineralizing agent and in air abrasion. It has been also found used as a pulp coating material, additive to restorative materials and implant coating material. This review aims to provide an up-to-date perspective on the use of bioactive glasses in dentistry today.

Keywords

Bioactive glass, dental materials, dentistry.

References

• Hench LL. The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:967–78.
• Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S. Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? J Funct Biomater 2018;9:25.
• Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 2013;9:4457–86.
• Montazerian M, Zanotto ED. A guided walk through Larry Hench’s monumental discoveries. J Mater Sci 2017;52:8695–732.
• Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:1–24.
• Ylänen H. Bioactive Glasses Materials, Properties and Applications. 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK; 2018. p.1-25.
• Deliormanli AM, Liu X, Rahaman MN. Evaluation of borate bioactive glass scaffolds with different pore sizes in a rat subcutaneous implantation model. J Biomater Appl 2014;28:643–53.
• Drago L, Toscano M, Bottagisio M. Recent Evidence on Bioactive Glass Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity: A Mini-Review. Mater 2018;11:326.
• Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011;32:2757–74.
• Xynos, Ioannis D, Edgar, A. J., Buttery, L. D, Hench, L. L, & Polak, J. M. Gene‐expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass® 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:151-7.
• Xynos ID, Hukkanen MVJ, Batten JJ, Buttery LD, Hench LL, Polak JM. Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering Calcif Tissue Int 2000;67:321–9.
• Begum S, Johnson WE, Worthington T, Martin RA. The influence of pH and fluid dynamics on the antibacterial efficacy of 45S5 Bioglass. Biomed Mater 2016 2;11:015006.
• Shi X, Nommeots-Nomm A, Todd NM, Devlin-Mullin A, Geng H, Lee PD, et al. Bioactive glass scaffold architectures regulate patterning of bone regeneration in vivo. Appl Mater Today 2020;20:100770.
• Jones JR, Lin S, Yue S, Lee PD, Hanna J V., Smith ME, et al. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration and their hierarchical characterisation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 2010;224:1373–87.
• Lindfors NC, Hyvönen P, Nyyssönen M, Kirjavainen M, Kankare J, Gullichsen E, et al. Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis. Bone 2010;47:212–8.
• Borden M, Westerlund LE, Lovric V, Walsh W. Controlling the bone regeneration properties of bioactive glass: Effect of particle shape and size. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2022;110:910–22.
• Profeta AC, Prucher GM. Bioactive-glass in periodontal surgery and implant dentistry. Dent Mater J 2015;34:559–71.
• Lovelace, T. B., Mellonig, J. T., Meffert, R. M., Jones, A. A., Nummikoski, P. V., & Cochran, D. L. Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Periodontal Osseous Defects in Humans. J Periodontol 1998;69:1027–35.
• Mota J, Yu N, Caridade SG, Luz GM, Gomes ME, Reis RL, et al. Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticle composite membranes for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater 2012;8:4173–80.
• Sohrabi K, Saraiya V, Laage TA, Harris M, Blieden M, Karimbux N. An Evaluation of Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Periodontal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. J Periodontol 2012;83:453–64.
• Kate MA, Palaskar S, Kapoor P. Implant failure: A dentist’s nightmare. J. Dent. Implant 2017;6:51.
• Ali S, Farooq I, Iqbal K. A review of the effect of various ions on the properties and the clinical applications of novel bioactive glasses in medicine and dentistry. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:1–5.
• Mistry S, Kundu D, Datta S, Basu D. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone. Aust Dent J 2011;56:68–75.
• Lopez-Esteban S, Saiz E, Fujino S, Oku T, Suganuma K, Tomsia AP. Bioactive glass coatings for orthopedic metallic implants. J Eur Ceram Soc 2003;23:2921–30.
• Oliver J anne N, Su Y, Lu X, Kuo PH, Du J, Zhu D. Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications. Bioact Mater 2019;4:261–70.
• Sergi R, Bellucci D, Cannillo V. A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Glass Coatings: State of the Art, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Coatings 2020;10:757.
• Ballo A. M., Cekic-Nagas I., Ergun G, Lassila, L, Palmquist, A, Borchardt P, Närhi, T. O. Osseointegration of fiber-reinforced composite implants: histological and ultrastructural observations. Dent Mater 2014;30:384-95.
• Long Y, Liu S, Zhu L, Liang Q, Chen X, Dong Y. Evaluation of Pulp Response to Novel Bioactive Glass Pulp Capping Materials. J Endod 2017;43:1647–50.
• Davaie S, Hooshmand T, Ansarifard S. Different types of bioceramics as dental pulp capping materials: A systematic review. Ceram Int 2021;47:20781–92.
• Wang S, Gao X, Gong W, Zhang Z, Chen X, Dong Y. Odontogenic differentiation and dentin formation of dental pulp cells under nanobioactive glass induction. Acta Biomater 2014;10:2792–803.
• Hanada K, Morotomi T, Washio A, Yada N, Matsuo K, Teshima H, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of a novel bioactive glass-based cement used as a direct pulp capping agent. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2019;107:161–8.
• Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of a Paste Containing Bioactive Glass and a Topical Cream Containing Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate: An in Vitro Study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2019;19:4668.
• Dai LL, Mei ML, Chu CH, Lo ECM. Mechanisms of Bioactive Glass on Caries Management: A Review. Mater 2019;12:4183.
• Taha AA, Patel MP, Hill RG, Fleming PS. The effect of bioactive glasses on enamel remineralization: A systematic review. J Dent 2017;67:9–17.
• Reynolds EC, Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD. Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar-free chewing gum. J Dent Res 2003;82:206–11.
• Soares R, Ataide IDN De, Fernandes M, Lambor R. Assessment of Enamel Remineralisation After Treatment with Four Different Remineralising Agents: A Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC136.
• Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW. Prevention of enamel demineralization after tooth bleaching by bioactive glass incorporated into toothpaste. Aust Dent J 2011;56:193–200.
• Mehta AB, Kumari V, Jose R, Izadikhah V. Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: An in-vitro pH-cycling study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:3.
• Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N, Jackson P, Grosgogeat B, Colon P. Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: A systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;76:1369–77.
• Jung JH, Park SB, Yoo KH, Yoon SY, Bae MK, Lee DJ, et al. Effect of different sizes of bioactive glass-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles on dentinal tubule occlusion and mineralization. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:2129–41.
• Mitchell JC, Musanje L, Ferracane JL. Biomimetic dentin desensitizer based on nano-structured bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2011;27:386–93.
• Paolinelis G, Banerjee A, Watson TF. An in vitro investigation of the effect and retention of bioactive glass air-abrasive on sound and carious dentine. J Dent 2008;36:214–8.
• Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial activity of particulate Bioglass® against supra- and subgingival bacteria. Biomaterials 2001;22:1683–7.
• Spagnuolo G, Pires PM, Calarco A, Peluso G, Banerjee A, Rengo S, et al. An in-vitro study investigating the effect of air-abrasion bioactive glasses on dental adhesion, cytotoxicity and odontogenic gene expression. Dent Mater 2021;37:1734–50.
• Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757–85.
• Yoshida Y, Inoue S. Chemical analyses in dental adhesive technology. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2012;48:141–52.
• Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Short- and Long-Term Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Glass-Modified Dental Adhesives. Nanomater 2021;11:1894.
• Rizk M, Hohlfeld L, Thanh LT, Biehl R, Lühmann N, Mohn D, et al. Bioactivity and properties of a dental adhesive functionalized with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) and bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2017;33:1056–65.
• Prabhakar A, M JP, Basappa N. Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effects and Surface Micro hardness of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53P4):An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010;3:69.
• Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LVJ, Närhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2005;21:201–9.
• Vicente A, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Martínez-Beneyto Y, Jaimez M, Guerrero-Gironés J, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, et al. Biophysical and Fluoride Release Properties of a Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Enriched with Bioactive Glasses. Symmetry 2021;13:494.
• Valanezhad A, Odatsu T, Udoh K, Shiraishi T, Sawase T, Watanabe I. Modification of resin modified glass ionomer cement by addition of bioactive glass nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2016;27:1–9.
• Yadav R, Meena A, Patnaik A. Biomaterials for dental composite applications: A comprehensive review of physical, chemical, mechanical, thermal, tribological, and biological properties. Polym Adv Technol 2022;33:1762–81.
• Tiskaya M, Shahid S, Gillam D, Hill R. The use of bioactive glass (BAG) in dental composites: A critical review. Dent Mater 2021;37:296–310.
• Odermatt R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Bioactivity and Physico-Chemical Properties of Dental Composites Functionalized with Nano- vs. Micro-Sized Bioactive Glass. J Clin Med 2020;9:772.
• Khvostenko D, Mitchell JC, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Kruzic JJ. Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites. Dent Mater 2013;29:1139–48.