“Üroloji ve COVID-19” Konulu Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi; Web of Science Örneği

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 62 - 68, 29.04.2024

Ibrahim Untan , Mümtaz Dadalı , Erol Erşekerci , Muhammet Şahin Bağbancı

https://doi.org/10.46332/aemj.1245720

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışma, pandeminin patlak vermesinden bu yana “Üroloji ve COVID-19” alanlarında yayınlanan 1616 çalışmanın bibliyometrik analiz ve trendlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Böylelikle araştırmacılara bu konulardaki araştırmaların istatistiksel dağılımları hakkında temel bilgiler verilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Araçlar ve Yöntem: Web of Science Core Collection Veritabanı kullanılarak 2020, 2021, 2022 ve 2023 yıl aralığında “Üroloji ve COVID-19” konulu bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar aynı dönemin “Üroloji” yayınlarıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Trendler ayrıca ücretsiz çevrimiçi görsel yazılım (carrot2) kullanılarak farklı verilerle değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Toplam 5481 makale bu çalışmalara 13036 kez atıf yapmıştır. En yaygın belge türü araştırma makalesi, en sık yayınlanan alan Üroloji & Nefroloji, en çok kullanılan dil İngilizce, en çok yayınlanan dergi Journal of Urology, en çok yayın veren ülke Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve en çok katkı sağlayan kurum Udice Üniversitesi olmuştur.

Sonuç: Dünyanın dengelerini bozan bu bulaşıcı hastalık, yayınların dengesini de kendi lehine değiştirmiştir. Ürologlar, pandemi ile mücadele ederken “Üroloji ve COVID-19” araştırmalarına izole “Üroloji” araştırmalarından daha çok önem vermiştir.

Keywords

bibliyometri, covıd-19, pandemi, sars-cov-2, üroloji, yeni koronavirus

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on “Urology and COVID-19”; Web of Science Example

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to reveal the bibliometric analysis and trends of 1616 studies published in the fields of "Urology and COVID-19" since the outbreak of the pandemic. Thus, it is aimed to provide researchers with basic information about the statistical distribution of research on these topics. This study aims to reveal the bibliometric analyzes and trends of 1616 studies published in the “Urology and COVID-19” fields since the pandemic broke out. Thus, it was aimed to provide researchers with basic information about the field of research on these subjects, in which countries it was conducted, and in which journals it was mostly published.

Materials and Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on "Urology and COVID-19" for 2020 - 2023 years using the Web of Science Core Collection Database. The results were compared with "Urology" publications of the same period. Trends were also evaluated with different data using free online visualization software (carrot2).

Results: A total of 5481 articles cited these studies 13036 times. The most common document type was research article, the most common field was Urology & Nephrology, the most common language was English, the most common journal for the Journal of Urology, the most common publishing country was the United States, and the most common contributing institution was Udice University.

Conclusion: This infectious disease, which disrupted the balance of the world, also changed the balance of publications in its favor. Urologists gave more importance to "Urology and COVID-19" research than isolated "Urology" research while fighting against the pandemic.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, COVID-19, novel coronavirus, pandemics, urology, sars-cov-2

Thanks

We wish all those who suffered from this global pandemic a speedy recovery. We thank all the healthcare professionals who struggled with the pandemic both in the research and in the field phases.

References

• 1. Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A, et al. Considerations in the Triage of Urologic Surgeries During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur Urol. 2020;77(6):663-666.
• 2. Statistical Bibliography in Relation to the Growth of Modern Civilization: Two Lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in May 1922. Nature. 1923;112(2816):585-586.
• 3. Raisig LM. Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1962;50(3):450-461.
• 4. Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J. Doc. 1969;25:348-349.
• 5. https://search.carrot2.org/#/search/pubmed/urology/treemap. Erişim tarihi 31 Ocak, 2023.
• 6. https://www.webofknowledge.com. Erişim tarihi 30 Ocak, 2023.
• 7. Farooq RK, Rehman SU, Ashiq M, Siddique N, Ahmad S. Bibliometric analysis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature published in Web of Science 2019-2020. J Family Community Med. 2021;28(1):1-7.
• 8. Iscaife A, Marchini GS, Srougi V, et al. The urologist's role in the fight of COVID-19 pandemic: mandatory mindset shift on the frontline. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(5):879-882.
• 9. Teoh JY, Ong WLK, Gonzalez-Padilla D, et al. A Global Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Urological Services. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):265-275.
• 10. Simoni M, Hofmann MC. The COVID-19 pandemics: Shall we expect andrological consequences? A call for contributions to andrology. Andrology. 2020;8(3):528-529.
• 11. Yang M, Chen S, Huang B, et al. Pathological Findings in the Testes of COVID-19 Patients: Clinical Implications. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(5):1124-1129.
• 12. Di Bitetti MS, Ferreras JA. Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio. 2017;46(1):121-127.
• 13. Dal-Re R, Morell F. The COVID-19 Pandemic Changes the Scientific Publication System. Arch Bronconeumol. 2021;57:17-18.
• 14. Siddiqui S, Ahmed A, Azim A. Selecting Journal for Publication in the Era of "Haste Predatory Journals and COVID-19". Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(12):1284-1285.
• 15. Rocco B, Sighinolfi MC, Sandri M, et al. The dramatic COVID 19 outbreak in Italy is responsible of a huge drop of urological surgical activity: a multicenter observational study. BJU Int. 2021;127(1):56-63.