Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Relationship between serum endocan levels and clinical follow-up in patients with acute pancreatitis: Can serum endocan be a biomarker for acute pancreatitis?

Year 2019, , 27 - 32, 29.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.543507

Abstract

Background and Aims: Several markers and scoring systems are used to determine the prognosis of acute pancreatitis. In this study, the role of endocan in predicting prognosis was investigated by comparing the relation between C-reactive protein, the Ranson score, the revised Atlanta classification, and other laboratory indicators in patients with mild and severe pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: Fifty acute pancreatitis patients were studied prospectively. Endocan, biochemical parameters, and C-reactive protein values were measured at the time of admission and on the second and seventh days. The time between complaints and patient admission, the length of stay, and the severity of pancreatitis according to the Ranson score and revised Atlanta classification were recorded. The SPSS 22.0 statistical package was used for data analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 61.36±16.21 years, and 54% of patients were female. According to the Ranson score, 20 cases (30%) had severe pancreatitis. When endocan levels in the mild and severe pancreatitis groups were compared at the time of application and at the second and seventh days, there were no statistically significant differences. There were no statistically significant differences in serum endocans between groups of patients classified according to the revised Atlanta scoring system. When patients were subdivided according to pancreatitis severity, the mean C-reactive protein levels on the second day were 95.05 mg/L in patients with severe pancreatitis and 77.06 mg/L in patients with mild pancreatitis. Other laboratory indices, such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin, were correlated with disease severity. Conclusion: To clarify the relationship between the prognosis of acute pancreatitis and endocans, more extensive prospective studies are needed.

References

  • saptanabilirdi. KAYNAKLAR 1- Stone HH, Fabian TC, Dunlop WE. Gallstone pancreatitis biliary tract pathology in relation to time of operation. Ann Surg 1981;194:305-12. 2- Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology 1985;156:767-72. 3- Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, et al. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:6049-52. 4- Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. The Atlanta Classification of 71 acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg 2008;95:6-21. 5- Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90. 6- Taşkın B, Nazlı O, Çökmez A, et al. Akut pankreatit olgularının değerlendirilmesi. Klinik ve Deneysel Cerrahi Dergisi. 1995; 3: 235. 7- Cho JH, Kim TN, Chung HH, Kim KH. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:2387-94. 8- Dambrauskas Z, Gulbinas A, Pundzius J, Barauskas G. Value of routine clinical tests in predicting the development of infected pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis. Scand. J Gastroenterol 2007;42:1256-64. 9- Chen CC, Wang SS, Chao Y, et al. C-reaktif protein and lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in the assesment of the prognosis of acute pancreatitis J. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;7:363-6. 10- Digalakis MK, Katsoulis IE, Biliri K, Themeli-Digalaki K. Serum profiles of CRP, IL-8 and TNFalfa in patients with acute pancreatitis. HPB Surg 2009;2009:878490. 11- Mozzhelin ME, Vengerovskii AI, Sukhodolo IV, Saratikov AS. Liver damages during experimental acute pancreatitis. Bull Exp Biol Med 2001;132:647-9. 12- Zeytunlu M, Akyıldız M, Tekeşin O, et al. Evaluation of acute pancreatitis according to international association of pancreatology guidelines. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2005;4:146-53. 13- Balta I, Balta S, Koryurek OM, et al. Serum endocan levels as a marker of disease activity in patients with Behçet disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:291-6.

Akut pankreatitli hastalarda serum endocan düzeyinin klinikle ilişkisi: Serum endocan akut pankreatitte biyomarker olabilir mi?

Year 2019, , 27 - 32, 29.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.543507

Abstract

Giriş ve Amaç: Akut pankreatit seyrinde
hastalığın prognozunu tayin etmek için birçok belirteç ve skorlama sistemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada endocan düzeyinin hafif ve
şiddetli pankreatit vakalarında C-reaktif protein, Ranson skoru, revize Atlanta
skorlaması ve diğer laboratuvar göstergeleri ile ilişkisi
karşılaştırılarak prognozu öngörmede öneminin araştırılması planlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 50 akut
pankreatit hastası prospektif olarak incelendi, başvuru anı, 2. ve 7. günlerde
endocan, biyokimyasal parametreler ve C-reaktif
protein değerleri ölçüldü. Hastaların şikayet ile başvuru arasındaki
zaman, yatış süreleri, skorlama sistemlerine göre pankreatit
şiddeti Ranson ve revize Atlanta skoru olarak kaydedildi. Verilerin
istatistiksel analizinde SPSS 22.0 paket programı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması
61.36±16.21
yıl olup olup %54’ü kadındı. Ranson skoruna göre
20 olgu (%30) şiddetli pankreatit idi. Endocan değerleri hafif pankreatit grubu
ve şiddetli pankreatit grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında başvuru anında, 2. ve 7. günlerde anlamlı sonuç vermemiştir. Revize Atlanta skorlamasına
göre sınıflandırılan hasta gruplarının serum endocan ile karşılaştırılmasında
istatistiksel açıdan fark görülmedi. Pankreatit şiddeti için 2. gün
bakılan C-reaktif protein şiddetli
pankreatitte ortalama 95.05 mg/L, hafif pankreatitte ise 77.06 mg/L olarak
saptandı. Diğer laboratuvar göstergelerinden alanin aminotransferaz, aspartat
aminotransferaz, gama glutamil transferaz, alkalen fosfataz, total bilirübin ve
direkt bilirübin hastalığın şiddeti ile korele saptandı. Sonuç: Akut pankreatit prognozu ile endocan arasındaki ilişkiyi
daha net ortaya koymak için daha geniş kapsamlı prospektif çalışmalara ihtiyaç
vardır.

References

  • saptanabilirdi. KAYNAKLAR 1- Stone HH, Fabian TC, Dunlop WE. Gallstone pancreatitis biliary tract pathology in relation to time of operation. Ann Surg 1981;194:305-12. 2- Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology 1985;156:767-72. 3- Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, et al. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:6049-52. 4- Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. The Atlanta Classification of 71 acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg 2008;95:6-21. 5- Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90. 6- Taşkın B, Nazlı O, Çökmez A, et al. Akut pankreatit olgularının değerlendirilmesi. Klinik ve Deneysel Cerrahi Dergisi. 1995; 3: 235. 7- Cho JH, Kim TN, Chung HH, Kim KH. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:2387-94. 8- Dambrauskas Z, Gulbinas A, Pundzius J, Barauskas G. Value of routine clinical tests in predicting the development of infected pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis. Scand. J Gastroenterol 2007;42:1256-64. 9- Chen CC, Wang SS, Chao Y, et al. C-reaktif protein and lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in the assesment of the prognosis of acute pancreatitis J. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;7:363-6. 10- Digalakis MK, Katsoulis IE, Biliri K, Themeli-Digalaki K. Serum profiles of CRP, IL-8 and TNFalfa in patients with acute pancreatitis. HPB Surg 2009;2009:878490. 11- Mozzhelin ME, Vengerovskii AI, Sukhodolo IV, Saratikov AS. Liver damages during experimental acute pancreatitis. Bull Exp Biol Med 2001;132:647-9. 12- Zeytunlu M, Akyıldız M, Tekeşin O, et al. Evaluation of acute pancreatitis according to international association of pancreatology guidelines. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2005;4:146-53. 13- Balta I, Balta S, Koryurek OM, et al. Serum endocan levels as a marker of disease activity in patients with Behçet disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:291-6.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emre Dönmez 0000-0002-0437-0696

Mesut Sezikli 0000-0002-0943-3756

Seyyid Bilal Açıkgöz This is me 0000-0002-4550-2712

Hayrünnisa Sezikli This is me 0000-0002-3300-6658

Publication Date April 29, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Dönmez, E., Sezikli, M., Açıkgöz, S. B., Sezikli, H. (2019). Akut pankreatitli hastalarda serum endocan düzeyinin klinikle ilişkisi: Serum endocan akut pankreatitte biyomarker olabilir mi?. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi, 18(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.543507

test-5