Doğanın Korunmasında Rejeneratif (Yenileyici) Tasarımın Yeri

Year 2021, , 295 - 306, 31.12.2021

Huriye Hande Harmankaya , Leyla Tokman

https://doi.org/10.53600/ajesa.1019529

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Doğa, her zaman insanların ilgisini çekerek bilgi ve ilham kaynağı olmuştur. Doğada mevcut prensiplerden yararlanarak oluşturulan, tasarım prensipleriyle yapılı çevre-doğa ilişkisi için uygun çözüm bulunabilir. Bunun için öncelikle insan-doğa ilişkisinin karşılıklı yarar sağlaması, birbirlerini destekleyerek ilerlemesi gerekliliği fark edilmelidir. Araştırmada, doğa temelli tasarım yaklaşımlarından; insanın çevresel sistemlerin parçası olduğu ve bu çevresel sistemlerde gerçekleşecek herhangi bir değişikliğin insanı da etkileyeceği gerçeğini temel alan rejeneratif tasarım ele alınmıştır. Rejeneratif yaklaşımda sadece var olan çevresel sistemlerin korunması değil, bu sistemlerin ilerlemesi, daha iyiye gitmesi hedeflenmektedir. Çevresel zararları iyileştirerek sonrasında çevreye katkı sağlamayı amaçlayan rejeneratif tasarım, çevresel sistemleri ve insan sağlığını iyileştirmeye yönelik önemli bir potansiyele sahiptir.

Keywords

Doğa, Mimari tasarım, Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, Rejeneratif tasarım

Regenerative Design in Nature Conservation

Abstract

Nature has always been a source of knowledge and inspiration by attracting people's attention. A suitable solution can be found for the relationship between built environment and nature with the design principles created by using the existing principles found in nature. For this, it should be realized that the human-nature relationship should provide mutual benefit and progress by supporting each other. In the research, regenerative design, one of the nature-based design approaches, that is based on the fact that human beings are a part of environmental systems and any change in these environmental systems will also affect humans, is discussed. In this approach, it is not only aimed to protect existing environmental systems, but also aimed to advance and improve these systems. Regenerative design, which aims to contribute to the environment by improving environmental damage, has an important potential to improve environmental systems and human health.

Keywords

Nature, Architectural design, Sustainability, Sustainable development, Regenerative design

References

• Brown, M., Haselsteiner, E., Apro, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K., Vula Rizvanolli, B. ́ 2018. Sustainability, Restorative to Regenerative. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability.
• Cole, R. J. 2012. Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 39-53.
• Craft, W., Ding, L., Prasad, D. 2017. Partridge, L., Else, D., Development of a regenerative design model for building retrofits. Procedia engineering, 180, 658-668.
• du Plessis, C. 2012. Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 7-22.
• du Plessis, C., Brandon, P. 2015. An ecological worldview as basis for a regenerative sustainability paradigm for the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 53-61.
• Littman, J. A. 2009. Regenerative Architecture: A Pathway Beyond Sustainability. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Art, Architecture and Art History.
• Lyle, J. T. 1994. Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
• Mahir, A. 2014. Exploring the Potential for Regenerative Design: Investigation of Ecosystem Services Analysis in the Built Environment. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Cardiff: Cardiff University, The Welsh School of Architecture.
• Mang, P., Reed, B. 2012a. Designing from place: a regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23-38.
• Mang P., Reed B. 2012b. Regenerative development and design. R. Meyers (Editör), Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology içinde (s. 8855–8879). New York: Springer.
• Reed, B. 2007. Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674-680.
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009). Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers. Fransa: UNEP DTIE.
• Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Galli, Alessandro; Hanscom, Laurel. 2020. “Humanity now overspends its biological budget every year”. Rosamunde Almond, Monique Grooten, Tanya Petersen (Ed.), Living Planet Report 2020 Bending the curve of biodiversity loss (56–59). Switzerland: WWF.
• World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) 2020. Living Planet Report 2020 Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Switzerland: WWF.
• Zari, M. P. 2012. Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 54-64.
• URL-1: https://www2.living-future.org/LBC4.0?RD_Scheduler=LBC4, (Erişim Tarihi: 28.10.2021)
• URL-2: https://www.usgbc.org/programs/leed-positive (Erişim Tarihi: 28.10.2021)
• URL-3: https://www.archdaily.com/215855/vandusen-botanical-garden-visitor-centre-perkinswill (Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2020)
• URL-4: https://living-future.org/lbc/case-studies/vandusen-botanical-garden-visitor-centre/#place (Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2020)
• URL-5: https://www.coxarchitecture.com.au/project/sustainable-buildings-research-centre/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2020)
• URL-6: https://www.wrnsstudio.com/sonoma-academy-janet-durgin-guild-commons-a-story ofcommunity-sustainability-and-place/ (Erişim Tarihi: 08.10.2021)
• URL-7: https://living-future.org/lbc/case-studies/sonoma-academy-guild-commons/ (Erişim Tarihi: 08.10.2021)
• URL-8: https://millerhull.com/project/miller-hull-san-diego-studio-renovation/ (Erişim Tarihi: 13.10.2021)
• URL-9: https://living-future.org/lbc/case-studies/miller-hull-san-diego-studio/ (Erişim Tarihi: 13.10.2021)
• URL-10: https://millerhull.com/project/the-kendeda-building/ (Erişim Tarihi: 13.10.2021)
• URL-11: https://living-future.org/lbc/case-studies/the-kendeda-building-for-innovative-sustainabledesign/ (Erişim Tarihi: 13.10.2021)