Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A PLATFORM PROPOSAL FOR THE EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES WITHIN THE CONCEPT OF ZERO WASTE IN İSTANBUL

Year 2023, , 27 - 39, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53600/ajesa.1321168

Abstract

This research investigates the economic benefits of zero-waste strategies in Istanbul's construction and demolition (C&D) waste sector. Current waste management practices, challenges, and stakeholder perspectives are analyzed to identify improvement opportunities. A case study demonstrates the potential of zero-waste principles in the C&D sector, emphasizing financial savings. This research introduces the Zero Waste Construction Material Exchange (ZWCME) platform, a digital solution connecting waste generators with potential users and recyclers, promoting reuse, recycling, and upcycling of C&D waste materials. The research explores industry implications, identifies enablers and barriers to zero-waste adoption, and examines the policy and regulatory framework needed to support the ZWCME platform. Results highlight significant potential for economic benefits through zero-waste strategies in Istanbul's C&D waste sector, emphasizing stakeholder collaboration, supportive policies, and innovative solutions like the ZWCME platform.

References

  • Akinade, Olugbenga O., Lukumon O. Oyedele, Saheed O. Ajayi, Muhammad Bilal, Hafiz A. Alaka, Sururah A. Bello, Babatunde E. Jaiyeoba, Kabir O. Kadiri, and Hakeem A. Owolabi. 2017. “Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical Success Factors for Diverting End-of-Life Waste from Landfills.” Waste Management 60:3–13.
  • Anon. n.d.-a. “HARFİYAT TOPRAĞI, İNŞAAT VE YIKINTI ATIKLARIN KONTROLÜ YÖNETMELİĞİ.”
  • Anon. n.d.-b. “Materialenbank (Materials Bank).”
  • Anon. n.d.-c. “ReUse People of America.”
  • BULUT, Arzu, and Halil ŞENGÜL. 2023. “ATIK YÖNETİMİ VE SIFIR ATIK PROJESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: İSTANBUL İLİ ÖRNEĞİ.” Sağlık ve Sosyal Refah Araştırmaları Dergisi. doi: 10.55050/sarad.1224470.
  • Demir, Goksel, Umut E. Kolay, H. Eser Okten, Ummugulsum Alyuz, and Cuma Bayat. 2016. “Selection of Alternative Landfill Location by Using a Geographical Information System. European Side of Istanbul. Case Study.” Environment Protection Engineering 42(1):123–33. doi: 10.5277/epe160110.
  • Gálvez-Martos, José Luis, David Styles, Harald Schoenberger, and Barbara Zeschmar-Lahl. 2018. “Construction and Demolition Waste Best Management Practice in Europe.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 136:166–78. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016.
  • Ghisellini, A., C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati. 2016. “A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems.” Journal of Cleaner Production 114:11–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
  • Kajikawa, Yuya, Junichiro Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki Takeda, and Koichi Matsushima. 2016. “Tracking Emerging Technologies in Energy Research: Toward a Roadmap for Sustainable Energy.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75(6):848–55.
  • Kibert. 2016. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery.
  • Lu, Weisheng, and Hongping Yuan. 2011. “A Framework for Understanding Waste Management Studies in Construction.” Waste Management 31(6):1252–60. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018.
  • Lu, Weisheng, Hongping Yuan, Jingru Li, Jane J. L. Hao, Xuming Mi, and Zhikun Ding. 2011. “An Empirical Investigation of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation Rates in Shenzhen City, South China.” Waste Management 31(4):680–87. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.004.
  • Lundie, Sven, Gregory M. Peters, and Paul C. Beavis. 2004. “Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Metropolitan Water Systems Planning.” Environmental Science and Technology 38(13):3465–73. doi: 10.1021/es034206m.
  • Osmani, M., J. Glass, and A. D. F. Price. 2008. “Architects’ Perspectives on Construction Waste Reduction by Design.” Waste Management 28(7):1147–58. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.011.
  • Silva, R. V., J. De Brito, and R. K. Dhir. 2014. “Properties and Composition of Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Waste Suitable for Concrete Production.” Construction and Building Materials 65:201–17. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.117.
  • Sönmez, Nurşen, and Sibel Maçka Kalfa. 2023. Investigation of Construction and Demolition Wastes in the European Union Member States According to Their Directives 1. Vol. 2.
  • Tam, Vivian W. Y., and C. M. Tam. 2006. “A Review on the Viable Technology for Construction Waste Recycling.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 47(3):209–21.
  • Tran, Van. 2017. Evaluating the Economics of Construction and Demolition Waste Minimisation and Zero Waste in the New Zealand Construction Industry.
  • Yuan, Hongping, and Liyin Shen. 2011. “Trend of the Research on Construction and Demolition Waste Management.” Waste Management 31(4):670–79.
  • Zaman, Atiq Uz. 2016. “A Comprehensive Study of the Environmental and Economic Benefits of Resource Recovery from Global Waste Management Systems.” Journal of Cleaner Production 124:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.086.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Civil Engineering (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Amany Lotfy A. S. Sawaby This is me 0000-0003-0609-9614

Göksel Demir This is me 0000-0002-7815-1197

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Submission Date April 6, 2023
Acceptance Date April 14, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA A. S. Sawaby, A. L., & Demir, G. (2023). A PLATFORM PROPOSAL FOR THE EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES WITHIN THE CONCEPT OF ZERO WASTE IN İSTANBUL. AURUM Journal of Engineering Systems and Architecture, 7(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.53600/ajesa.1321168