CREATING ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING FOR A STUDENT UNION PROJECT

Year 2023, , 119 - 143, 30.06.2023

Büşra Nur Aydın Aktaş , Afra Nur Bozkurt Tomas Malez

https://doi.org/10.53600/ajesa.1321211

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish architectural programming and typology of buildings by analyzing the concrete and abstract values connecting students with the Student Union and the campus community. Understanding the needs of the users and activities is crucial for spatial organizations and architectural programming. This research uses both main and secondary data collection through; literature review, case studies, student survey, and interview methods. The scope of programming is defined to cover student union building design and its programming. Architectural programming is an advanced design tool supporting architectural design. Buildings are often, mostly knowingly, constructed to fulfill particular needs. Architecture and architectural programming describe the starting point and end point of the project, which evolved together, to satisfy the demands and needs of users and clients. In this report, the Student Union project's architectural programming, which serves as a community center in universities, is created. The students' diverse needs are understood, and the technologies and inventions of today are incorporated into the design program in the case of the student union building project. Comprehensive analysis and thorough understanding produce the program. This research plan, as part of the report, is assessed and altered.

Keywords

Architectural Programming, Educational Architecture, Student Union Building

References

• ACUI, Association of College Unions International. (2005). Task Force on the Development of Core Competencies in the College Union and Student Activities Profession. Identification of Core Competencies Report.
• Aydın, D. (2017). Analysis for Architectural Design and Programming: Courthouses. Online Journal of Art and Design, 5(1), 84-99.
• Brill, M. (1993). “Foreword”, Architectural Programming,. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Cherry, E. (1999). Programming for Design, From Theory to Practice. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Cherry, E., & Petronis, J. (2016, 02 11). Whole Building Design Guide. (National Insitute of Building Sciences) Retrieved 12 26, 2019, from https://www.wbdg.org/design-disciplines/architectural-programming Dinç, P. (2002). BUILDING PROGRAMMING: FROM “PROBLEM SEEKING” TO. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 101-119.
• Duerk, D. (1993). Architectural Programming. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Hershberger, R. (1985). “Values: A Theoretical Foundation for Architectural Programming”, Programming the Built Environment. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Hershberger, R. (1993). “Recent Development in Facility Programming” Professional Practice in Facility Programming. USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Hershberger, R. (1999). Architectural Programming and Predesign Manager. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
• Lory Student Center. (1962). Colorado State University Lory Student Center. Retrieved 10 24, 2019, from https://lsc.colostate.edu/building-maps/
• Maxwell, D. (2016). Student Union Transformation: A Case Study On Creating Purposeful Space.
• Mckinney, A. (2010). Advance program narrative for new student union. Florida: University of West Florida.
• Pena, W. (1999). "Foreword" Programming for Design, From Theory to Practice. New York: Cherry, E., John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Pena, W., Parshall, S., & Kelly, K. (1977). Problem Seeking, An Architectural Programming Primer. USA: AIA Press.
• Perkin&Will. (2010). Creating Common Ground. Retrieved 12 24, 2019, from https://perkinswill.com/area-of-expertise/student-unions/
• Preiser, W. (1985). "Introduction" Programming the Built Environment. New York,USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Preiser, W. (1993). “Epilogue” Professional Practice In Facility Programming. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Sanoff, H. (1977). Methods of Architectural Programming. USA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc.
• Silvertein, M., & Jacobson, M. (1985). “Restructuring the Hidden Program: Toward an Architecture of Social Change”, Programming the Built Environment, Preiser, W.F.E. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• Tierno, S. (2013). College Union Facilities and Their Perceived Influence on Institutional Retention. Franklin Pierce University.