Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 24, 120 - 140, 27.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174

Abstract

In this study, Turkish-Russian relations in the Cold War period and the Post-Cold War time till 2002 are discussed. Since 2002 is accepted as the beginning of current relations and a breakthrough year in relations, a separate analysis is required for the next period. It is seen that the relations between Türkiye and Russia were tense between the years 1945-1965, and then went through a soft period until the end of the Cold War period. It is clearly understood that Turkish-Russian relations gained a new dimension after the collapse of the USSR. Economic-commercial relations constituted the most important area of this period, in which competition also predominated. In the first part of this study, the historical development of Turkish-Soviet relations in the Cold War period is tried to be discussed. Economic and commercial relations assumed the locomotive role in the cooperation between the two countries, giving a different quality to the political, military and security issues and relations with third countries. In the second part, the new era for the affairs is analyzed and, in this regard, it should be noted that the leaders of the two countries have made great efforts since the beginning of the 1990s. In these years, many strategic projects were signed and implemented in the context of bilateral relations. It is obvious that the relations between the two countries reached a strategic dimension in areas such as economic-commercial and energy. It is also analyzed that the momentum gained in Turkish-Russian relations and the good level of relations also served regional stability and common interests. Finally, it may be assumed that the years examined by this paper is also a period that helped to create strong relations between two countries in the 21st century.

References

  • CIA. (1964). Turkish reaction to President Johnson's letter to Prime Minister Inonu. Retrieved on 2023, June 25 from https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000615268.pdf.
  • Cutler, R. M. (1985). Domestic and foreign influences on policy making: The Soviet Union in the 1974 Cyprus conflict. Soviet Studies, 37(1), 60–89.
  • De Luca, A. R. (1977). Soviet-American politics and the Turkish Straits. Political Science Quarterly, 92(3), 503–524.
  • Di Casola, M. A. (1997). Italo-Turkish relations between the two wars: The impact of the Ethiopian crisis. Il Politico, 62(181), 331–342.
  • Filitov, A., & Williams, R. (2011). The end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the USSR. Journal of Modern European History / Zeitschrift Für Moderne Europäische Geschichte / Revue d’histoire Européenne Contemporaine, 9(3), 298–307.
  • Fisher, R. E. (1995). The ad hoc nature of policy making: The “Missouri” visit to Turkey. Naval War College Review, 48(2), 130–134.
  • Gaddis, J. L. (1990). The unexpected John Foster Dulles: nuclear weapons, communism, and the Russians. In R. H. Immerman (Ed.), John Foster Dulles and the diplomacy of the Cold War (pp. 47–78). Princeton University Press.
  • Hahn, P. L. (1987). Containment and Egyptian nationalism: The unsuccessful effort to establish the Middle East command, 1950–53. Diplomatic History, 11(1), 23–40.
  • Harris, G. S. (1982). The View from Ankara. The Wilson Quarterly, 6(5), 126–135.
  • Iqbal, M. Z., & Shah, N. (2015). The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: Political and economic impacts for the region. Pakistan Horizon, 68(1), 69–81.
  • Kerr, D. (1995). The new Eurasianism: the rise of geopolitics in Russia’s foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(6), 977–988.
  • Larrabee, F. S., & Lesser, I. O. (2003). Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty. RAND Corporation.
  • Leffler, M. P. (1985). Strategy, diplomacy, and the Cold War: The United States, Turkey, and NATO, 1945-1952. The Journal of American History, 71(4), 807–825.
  • Lesser, I. O. (2000). Turkey in a changing security environment. Journal of International Affairs, 54(1), 183–198.
  • Lippe, J.M.V. (2000). Forgotten brigade of the forgotten war: Turkey’s participation in the Korean War. Middle Eastern Studies, 36(1), 92–102.
  • Magen, Z. (2013). Russia and the Middle East: Policy challenges. Institute for National Security Studies.
  • Magnúsdóttir, R. (2006). Be careful in America, Premier Khrushchev!: Soviet perceptions of peaceful coexistence with the United States in 1959. Cahiers Du Monde Russe, 47(1/2), 109–130.
  • Malek, M. (2009). Russia’s asymmetric wars in Chechnya since 1994. Connections, 8(4), 81–98.
  • Mark, E. (1997). The war scare of 1946 and Its consequences. Diplomatic History, 21(3), 383–415.
  • Marples, D.R. (2002). Motherland: Russia in the twentieth century. Routledge.
  • Matsaberidze, D. (2015). Russia vs. EU/US through Georgia and Ukraine. Connections, 14(2), 77–86.
  • Merrill, D. (2006). The Truman doctrine: containing communism and modernity. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 27–37.
  • MFA, Republic of Türkiye. (2009). Joint declaration between the Republic of Turkey and the Russian Federation on progress towards a new stage in relations and further deepening of friendship and multidimentional partnership. Retrieved on 2023, July 17 from https://www.mfa.gov.tr/joint-declaration-between-the-republic-of-turkey-and-the-russian-federation-on-progress-towards-a-new-stage-in-relations-and-further-deepening-of-friendship-and-multidimentional-partnership_-moscow_-13-february-2009.en.mfa.
  • Moroney, J., Rabasa, A., Boraz, S., Chalk, P., Cragin, K., Karasik, T. W., O’Brien, K. A., & Peters, J. E. (2007). Ungoverned territories: understanding and reducing terrorism risks (1st ed.). RAND Corporation.
  • Onozawa, T. (2005). Formation of American regional policy for the Middle East, 1950–1952: The Middle East command concept and its legacy. Diplomatic History, 29(1), 117–148.
  • Press Briefing of Turkish President. (2004). Statements by President Ahmet Necdet SEZER to the press after the meetings with President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. Putin. Retrieved on 2023, July 05 from https://www.tccb.gov.tr/basin-aciklamalari-ahmet-necdet-sezer/1720/6460/cumhurbaskani-ahmet-necdet-sezerin-rusya-federasyonu-devlet-baskani-vladimir-v-putin-ile-heyetlerarasi-gorusmelerin-ardindan-basina-yaptiklari-aciklama.
  • Reiman, M. (2016). About Russia, its revolutions, its development and its present. Peter Lang AG.
  • Reston, J. (1957). Khrushchev asks world rule of the satellite and missiles if part of wide U.S.-Soviet Pact. Retrieved on 2023, July 10 from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/partners/aol/special/sputnik/sput-13.html.
  • Roberts, G. (2011). Moscow’s Cold War on the periphery: Soviet policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943–8. Journal of Contemporary History, 46(1), 58–81.
  • Ruddy, T. M. (1986). A cautious approach to the militarization of containment. The Historian, 48(3), 394–411.
  • Schoenberger, E., & Reich, S. (1975). Soviet policy in the Middle East. MERIP Reports, 39, 3–28.
  • Stergiou, A. (2007). Soviet policy toward Cyprus. The Cyprus Review, 19(2), 83-106.
  • Trading Economics. (2023). Turkey exports to Russia. Retrieved on 2023, June 06 from https://tradingeconomics.com/turkey/exports/russia.
  • Turkic States. (2023). Presidential summits. Retrieved on 2023, June 19 from https://www.turkicstates.org/en/zirveler.
  • Turkish Straits. (1998). Maritime traffic regulations for Turkish Straits. Retrieved on 2023, June 24 from http://www.solna.com.tr/Maritime_Traffic_Regulations_for_Turkish_Straits.pdf.
  • UN. (2002). Delimitation treaties infobase. exchange of notes constituting an agreement on the delimitation of the USSR and Turkey economic zone in the Black Sea 23 December 1986 - 6 February 1987. Retrieved on 2023, July 02 from https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/RUS-TUR1987EZ.PDF.
  • US Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute. (1957). Foreign relations of The United States, 1955–1957, Soviet Union, Eastern Mediterranean, Volume XXIV. Retrieved on 2023, June 25 from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v24/d363.
  • Walker, J. W. (2005). Turkey and the Post-Soviet states: a new way forward. Insight Turkey, 7(4), 13–19.
  • Yaacov, R. (1974). From encroachment to involvement: a documentary study of Soviet Policy in the Middle East, 1945-1973. Halsted Press - Israel Universities Press.
  • Ziegler, C. (2009). The history of Russia. California: Greenwood Press.

SOĞUK SAVAŞ'TAN GÜNCEL İLİŞKİLERİN BAŞLANGICI OLARAK 2002 YILINA KADAR TÜRK-RUS İLİŞKİLERİ

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 24, 120 - 140, 27.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Soğuk Savaş ve sonrası dönemde 2002 yılına kadarki Türk-Rus ilişkileri ele alınmaktadır. 2002 yılı, güncel ilişkilerin başlangıcı ve ilişkilerde bir atılım yılı olarak kabul edildiğinden sonraki dönem için ayrı bir analiz gerekmektedir.1945-1965 yılları arasında Türkiye ile Rusya arasındaki ilişkilerin gergin olduğu, ardından Soğuk Savaş döneminin sonuna kadar yumuşak bir dönem geçirdiği görülmektedir. SSCB'nin dağılmasından sonra Türk-Rus ilişkilerinin yeni bir boyut kazandığı açıkça anlaşılmaktadır. Rekabetin de hâkim olduğu bu dönemin en önemli alanını ekonomik-ticari ilişkiler oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın birinci bölümünde Soğuk Savaş ve sonrası dönemde Türk-Sovyet ilişkilerinin tarihsel gelişimi ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Ekonomik ve ticari ilişkiler, iki ülke arasındaki işbirliğinde lokomotif rolü üstlenmiş, siyasi, askeri ve güvenlik konularına ve üçüncü ülkelerle ilişkilere farklı bir nitelik kazandırmıştır. İkinci bölümde ise ilişkilerde yeni dönem analiz edilmekte olup, bu konuda iki ülke liderlerinin 1990'lı yılların başından bu yana büyük çaba sarf ettiğini belirtmek gerekir. Bu yıllarda ikili ilişkiler bağlamında birçok stratejik projeye imza atılmış ve hayata geçirilmiştir. İki ülke ilişkilerinin ekonomik-ticari ve enerji gibi alanlarda stratejik bir boyuta ulaştığı aşikardır. Türk-Rus ilişkilerinde kazanılan ivmenin ve iyi düzeydeki ilişkilerin bölgesel istikrara ve ortak çıkarlara da hizmet ettiği analiz edilmektedir. Son olarak bu yazının incelediği yılların aynı zamanda 21. yüzyılda iki ülke arasında güçlü ilişkilerin oluşmasına yardımcı olan bir dönem olduğu varsayılabilir.

References

  • CIA. (1964). Turkish reaction to President Johnson's letter to Prime Minister Inonu. Retrieved on 2023, June 25 from https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000615268.pdf.
  • Cutler, R. M. (1985). Domestic and foreign influences on policy making: The Soviet Union in the 1974 Cyprus conflict. Soviet Studies, 37(1), 60–89.
  • De Luca, A. R. (1977). Soviet-American politics and the Turkish Straits. Political Science Quarterly, 92(3), 503–524.
  • Di Casola, M. A. (1997). Italo-Turkish relations between the two wars: The impact of the Ethiopian crisis. Il Politico, 62(181), 331–342.
  • Filitov, A., & Williams, R. (2011). The end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the USSR. Journal of Modern European History / Zeitschrift Für Moderne Europäische Geschichte / Revue d’histoire Européenne Contemporaine, 9(3), 298–307.
  • Fisher, R. E. (1995). The ad hoc nature of policy making: The “Missouri” visit to Turkey. Naval War College Review, 48(2), 130–134.
  • Gaddis, J. L. (1990). The unexpected John Foster Dulles: nuclear weapons, communism, and the Russians. In R. H. Immerman (Ed.), John Foster Dulles and the diplomacy of the Cold War (pp. 47–78). Princeton University Press.
  • Hahn, P. L. (1987). Containment and Egyptian nationalism: The unsuccessful effort to establish the Middle East command, 1950–53. Diplomatic History, 11(1), 23–40.
  • Harris, G. S. (1982). The View from Ankara. The Wilson Quarterly, 6(5), 126–135.
  • Iqbal, M. Z., & Shah, N. (2015). The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: Political and economic impacts for the region. Pakistan Horizon, 68(1), 69–81.
  • Kerr, D. (1995). The new Eurasianism: the rise of geopolitics in Russia’s foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(6), 977–988.
  • Larrabee, F. S., & Lesser, I. O. (2003). Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty. RAND Corporation.
  • Leffler, M. P. (1985). Strategy, diplomacy, and the Cold War: The United States, Turkey, and NATO, 1945-1952. The Journal of American History, 71(4), 807–825.
  • Lesser, I. O. (2000). Turkey in a changing security environment. Journal of International Affairs, 54(1), 183–198.
  • Lippe, J.M.V. (2000). Forgotten brigade of the forgotten war: Turkey’s participation in the Korean War. Middle Eastern Studies, 36(1), 92–102.
  • Magen, Z. (2013). Russia and the Middle East: Policy challenges. Institute for National Security Studies.
  • Magnúsdóttir, R. (2006). Be careful in America, Premier Khrushchev!: Soviet perceptions of peaceful coexistence with the United States in 1959. Cahiers Du Monde Russe, 47(1/2), 109–130.
  • Malek, M. (2009). Russia’s asymmetric wars in Chechnya since 1994. Connections, 8(4), 81–98.
  • Mark, E. (1997). The war scare of 1946 and Its consequences. Diplomatic History, 21(3), 383–415.
  • Marples, D.R. (2002). Motherland: Russia in the twentieth century. Routledge.
  • Matsaberidze, D. (2015). Russia vs. EU/US through Georgia and Ukraine. Connections, 14(2), 77–86.
  • Merrill, D. (2006). The Truman doctrine: containing communism and modernity. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 27–37.
  • MFA, Republic of Türkiye. (2009). Joint declaration between the Republic of Turkey and the Russian Federation on progress towards a new stage in relations and further deepening of friendship and multidimentional partnership. Retrieved on 2023, July 17 from https://www.mfa.gov.tr/joint-declaration-between-the-republic-of-turkey-and-the-russian-federation-on-progress-towards-a-new-stage-in-relations-and-further-deepening-of-friendship-and-multidimentional-partnership_-moscow_-13-february-2009.en.mfa.
  • Moroney, J., Rabasa, A., Boraz, S., Chalk, P., Cragin, K., Karasik, T. W., O’Brien, K. A., & Peters, J. E. (2007). Ungoverned territories: understanding and reducing terrorism risks (1st ed.). RAND Corporation.
  • Onozawa, T. (2005). Formation of American regional policy for the Middle East, 1950–1952: The Middle East command concept and its legacy. Diplomatic History, 29(1), 117–148.
  • Press Briefing of Turkish President. (2004). Statements by President Ahmet Necdet SEZER to the press after the meetings with President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. Putin. Retrieved on 2023, July 05 from https://www.tccb.gov.tr/basin-aciklamalari-ahmet-necdet-sezer/1720/6460/cumhurbaskani-ahmet-necdet-sezerin-rusya-federasyonu-devlet-baskani-vladimir-v-putin-ile-heyetlerarasi-gorusmelerin-ardindan-basina-yaptiklari-aciklama.
  • Reiman, M. (2016). About Russia, its revolutions, its development and its present. Peter Lang AG.
  • Reston, J. (1957). Khrushchev asks world rule of the satellite and missiles if part of wide U.S.-Soviet Pact. Retrieved on 2023, July 10 from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/partners/aol/special/sputnik/sput-13.html.
  • Roberts, G. (2011). Moscow’s Cold War on the periphery: Soviet policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943–8. Journal of Contemporary History, 46(1), 58–81.
  • Ruddy, T. M. (1986). A cautious approach to the militarization of containment. The Historian, 48(3), 394–411.
  • Schoenberger, E., & Reich, S. (1975). Soviet policy in the Middle East. MERIP Reports, 39, 3–28.
  • Stergiou, A. (2007). Soviet policy toward Cyprus. The Cyprus Review, 19(2), 83-106.
  • Trading Economics. (2023). Turkey exports to Russia. Retrieved on 2023, June 06 from https://tradingeconomics.com/turkey/exports/russia.
  • Turkic States. (2023). Presidential summits. Retrieved on 2023, June 19 from https://www.turkicstates.org/en/zirveler.
  • Turkish Straits. (1998). Maritime traffic regulations for Turkish Straits. Retrieved on 2023, June 24 from http://www.solna.com.tr/Maritime_Traffic_Regulations_for_Turkish_Straits.pdf.
  • UN. (2002). Delimitation treaties infobase. exchange of notes constituting an agreement on the delimitation of the USSR and Turkey economic zone in the Black Sea 23 December 1986 - 6 February 1987. Retrieved on 2023, July 02 from https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/RUS-TUR1987EZ.PDF.
  • US Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute. (1957). Foreign relations of The United States, 1955–1957, Soviet Union, Eastern Mediterranean, Volume XXIV. Retrieved on 2023, June 25 from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v24/d363.
  • Walker, J. W. (2005). Turkey and the Post-Soviet states: a new way forward. Insight Turkey, 7(4), 13–19.
  • Yaacov, R. (1974). From encroachment to involvement: a documentary study of Soviet Policy in the Middle East, 1945-1973. Halsted Press - Israel Universities Press.
  • Ziegler, C. (2009). The history of Russia. California: Greenwood Press.
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects International Relations (Other)
Journal Section Tüm Sayı
Authors

Burak Şakir Şeker 0000-0002-8536-1790

Publication Date April 27, 2024
Submission Date August 29, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 24

Cite

APA Şeker, B. Ş. (2024). TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 11(24), 120-140. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174
AMA Şeker BŞ. TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS. Akademik Hassasiyetler. April 2024;11(24):120-140. doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174
Chicago Şeker, Burak Şakir. “TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 11, no. 24 (April 2024): 120-40. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174.
EndNote Şeker BŞ (April 1, 2024) TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS. Akademik Hassasiyetler 11 24 120–140.
IEEE B. Ş. Şeker, “TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS”, Akademik Hassasiyetler, vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 120–140, 2024, doi: 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174.
ISNAD Şeker, Burak Şakir. “TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 11/24 (April 2024), 120-140. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174.
JAMA Şeker BŞ. TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2024;11:120–140.
MLA Şeker, Burak Şakir. “TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS”. Akademik Hassasiyetler, vol. 11, no. 24, 2024, pp. 120-4, doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1352174.
Vancouver Şeker BŞ. TURKISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS FROM THE COLD WAR TO 2002 AS THE BEGINNING OF CURRENT RELATIONS. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2024;11(24):120-4.

MAKALE DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİ

Yazar tarafından gönderilen bir makale, gönderim tarihinden itibaren 10 gün içinde dergi sekreteri tarafından makalenin, telif sözleşmesinin ve benzerlik raporunun (Turnitin programı) eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden incelenir. İstenilen bu dosyalar eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilmiş ise makale; ikinci aşamada derginin yayın çizgisine uygun olup olmadığı yönünden değerlendirilir. Bu süreçte makale yayın çizgisine uygun değilse yazara iade edilir. Makale yayın çizgisine uygun ise şablona uygun bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden değerlendirilir. Şayet makale şablona uyarlanıp gönderilmemiş ise değerlendirme sürecine alınmaz. Bu süreçte yazarın derginin belirlediği şartlara uygun bir şekilde sisteme makale yüklemesi beklenir. Makale şablona uygun bir şekilde hazırlanıp gönderilmiş ise son aşamada makale derginin yayın ilkeleri, yazım kuralları, öz, abstract, extented abstract, kaynakça gösterimi vb. yönlerden incelenir. Bu ayrıntılarda makalede bir sorun varsa yazarın bu hususları tamamlaması istenir ve verilen süre içerisinde eksiksiz bir şekilde yeniden makaleyi göndermesi istenir.
Tüm bu aşamaları geçen makale, editör tarafından bilimsel yeterliliğinin denetlenmesi amacıyla ikinci 7 günlük süre içerisinde çalışmaya uygun iki hakeme değerlendirmeleri için gönderilir. Hakemlerin değerlendirme süreleri 15 gündür. Bu süre zarfında hakemlik görevini tamamlamayan bir hakem olursa ilgili hakeme değerlendirmeyi tamamlaması için 7 günlük ek süre verilebilir. Bu süre zarfında hakem görevini yerine getirmezse yerine yeni bir hakem ataması yapılır. En az iki hakemden gelen raporlar olumlu ise makale yayın aşamasına alınır. Hakem raporlarından birisi olumlu diğeri olumsuz ise makale üçüncü bir hakeme gönderilir. Üçüncü hakem raporu da olumsuz ise makale ret edilir. Üçüncü hakemin değerlendirmesi olumlu ise makaleyle ilgili hakem raporları dergi alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından incelenir. Makalenin yayınlanmasıyla ilgili nihai karar alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Hakem raporlarının yetersiz ve tatmin etmekten uzak olması veya İngilizce editör tarafından abstract ve extented abstract’ın yetersiz görülmesi hallerinde de yine makaleyle ilgili son karar Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Tüm bu aşamalardan geçen bir makale en yakın sayıya yayınlanmak üzere eklenir. İlgili sayıda yer kalmaması halinde makalenin yayımı bir sonraki sayıya kaydırılır. Bu durumda ve tüm değerlendirme sürecinde yazar isterse makalesini geri çekme hakkına sahiptir. Ancak bu durumu dergiye bildirmesi gerekir. Makale gönderim tarihinden makalenin yayına kabul tarihine kadar tüm bu işlemler için ortalama 3 aylık bir süre öngörülmektedir.