Lider-Üye Etkileşimine Çok Boyutlu Yaklaşım: Liden ve Maslyn’in Dört Boyutlu Lider-Üye Etkileşim Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özelliklerine Yönelik Görgül Bir Araştırma

Year 2008, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 95 - 123, 13.08.2014

Gültekin Yıldız , Hatice Özutku , Esin Cevrioğlu

Abstract

Lider-üye etkileşim teorisi ile ilgili erken dönem çalışmalarının çoğunda lider ile üyeler arasındaki ilişkiler tek boyutlu bir yaklaşımla ele alınmıştır. Oysa ki son zamanlarda, rol teorisi ve sosyal değişim teorisinin de açıkça ortaya koyduğu gibi lider-üye etkileşiminin çok boyutlu bir nitelik taşıdığı düşüncesi önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Bu düşünce, lider-üye etkileşiminin çok boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğunu ortaya koyan teorik ve ampirik çalışmalarla desteklenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, lider-üye etkileşimi çok boyutlu bir yaklaşım çerçevesinde ele alınarak, Liden ve Maslyn tarafından geliştirilen etki, bağlılık, katkı ve profesyonel saygı boyutlarını içeren lider-üye etkileşim ölçeğinin psikometrik özellikleri Türkiye’de bir tıp fakültesi örnekleminde incelenmiştir. Örneklemden elde edilen verilere doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen uyum iyiliği istatistikleri, lider-üye etkileşim modelinin etki, katkı ve profesyonel saygı olmak üzere üç boyuta sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Keywords

Lider-üye etkileşim teorisi, Rol teorisi, Sosyal değişim teorisi

Lider-Üye Etkileşimine Çok Boyutlu Yaklaşım: Liden ve Maslyn’in Dört Boyutlu Lider-Üye Etkileşim Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özelliklerine Yönelik Görgül Bir Araştırma

Abstract

In most of the initial studies of leader-member exchange theory the relationship between leader and members is considered unidimensionally. However, as it has been put forward by the recent studies in role theory and social exchange theory, the leader-member exchange is thought to be multidimensional. This notion has been supported by both theoretical and empirical studies. In this study, by analyzing leader-member exchange in a multidimensional framework we investigate psychometric characteristics of leader-member exchange scale developed by Liden and Maslyn including effect, loyalty, contribution, and professional respect dimensions in a medical school in Turkey. We apply confirmatory factor analysis to sample data. The goodness of fit statistics indicates that leader-member exchange model has four dimensions including effect, contribution and professional respect.

Keywords

Leader-member exchange theory, Role theory, Social exchange theory

References

• BAGOZZİ, R.P. Yi, Y. ve Phillips, L.W. (1991), “Assesing Construct Validity in Organizational Research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.36, s. 421-458.
• BAUER, T. N. ve Graen, S. G. (1996), “Development of Leader-Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 6, s. 1538-1567.
• CASTRO, S.L. ve Cogliser, C. C. (1999), “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Research: A Comprehensive Review of Theory, Measurement, and Data-Analytic Practices”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, s. 63- 114.
• DANSERAU, F.J., Graen, G. ve Haga, W.J. (1975), “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations- a Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13, s. 46-78.
• DELUGA, R.J. (1994), “Supervisor Trust Building, Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 67, s. 315-326.
• DIENESCH, R.M. ve Liden, R.C., (1986), “Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, No. 3, s. 618-634.
• DIERENDONCK, V.D., Blanc, P.M. ve Breukelen W. (2002), “Supervisory Behavior, Reciprocity and Subordinate Absenteeism”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol.23, No. 2, s.84-92.
• DIONEE, L. (2000), “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): Level of Negotiating Latitude and Job Satisfaction”, (http://www.onepine.info/lmxpaper.doc, 3.01.2006).
• ELİAS, S.M. ve MacDonald, S.R. (2006), “Consequences of Restrictive And Promotive Managerial Control Among American University Professors”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 14, No.3, s.239-250.
• GEERSİNG, J., Furda, J. ve Komproe, I.H. (1993), “Leader Member Exchanges: Distinction Between Two Factors”, European Work and Organizational Psychologist, Vol.3, No.4, s. 297-309.
• GERSTNER, C.R. ve Day, David V. (1997), “Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 6, s. 827-844.
• GRAEN, G., Cashman, J., Ginsburgh, S. ve Schiemann, W., (1977), “Effects of Linking-Pin Quality on the Quality of Working Life Lower Participants, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, s. 491-504.
• GRAEN, G.B. ve Scandura, T.A., (1987), “Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, s. 175-208.
• GRAEN, G.B., ve Uhl-Bien, M., (1995), “Reletaionship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Domain Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 6, s.219-247.
• GREEN,C., (2008), “Leader Member Exchange And The Use of Moderating Conflict Management Styles” International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 19, No.2. s. 92-111.
• HARRIS, M.M., ve Schaubroeck, J. (1990), “Confirmatory Modeling in Organizational Behavior/Human Resource Management: Issues and Applications”, Journal of Management, Vol. 16, s.337-360.
• HOUSE, R.J. ve Aditya, R.N., (1997), “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership; Qua Vadis?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, s.409- 473.
• JANSSEN, O. ve Yperen N.W.V., (2004), “Employees’ Goal Orientations, The Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, And the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, No.3, s.368-384.
• JÖRESKOG, K.ve Sörbom, D. (1996), LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Second Edition, SSI Scientific Software International, Chicago.
• LE BLANC, P., De Jong, R., Geersing, J. ve Komproe, I. (1993), “Leader- Member Exchanges: Distinction Between Two Factors”, European Work and Organizational Psychologist, Vol. 3, No. 4, s. 297-309.
• LIDEN, R. ve Graen, G. (1980), “Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, s. 451- 465.
• LIDEN, R.C. ve Maslyn, J.M. (1998), “Multidimensionality of Leader- Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development”, Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, s. 43-72.
• LIDEN, R.C., Sparrowe, R. T. ve Wayne, S. J. (1997), “Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential for the Future”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 15, s. 47-119.
• MASLYN, J.M. ve Uhl-Bien, M., (2001), “Leader-Member Exchange and Its Dimensions: Effects of Self-Effort and Other’s Effort on Relationship Quality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 4, s. 697-708.
• MORROW,P. C., Suzuki, Y., CrumM.R. ve Ruben, R. (2005),”The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in High Turnover Work Environments”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20, No.8, s.681-694.
• NUNNALLY, J.C. ve Bernstein, I., (1994), Psychometric Theory, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology.
• SCANDURA, T.A. ve Graen, G., (1984), “Moderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange Status on the Effects of a Leadership Intervention”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, 428-436.
• SCANDURA, T.A., (1999), “Rethinking Leader-Member Exchange: An Organizational Justice Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, s.25-37.
• SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., Neider, L.L., Scandura, T.A., ve Tepper, B. J., (1992),“Development and Preliminary Validation of New Scale (LMX- 6) to Measure Leader-Member Exchange in Organizations“, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 52, s. 135-147.
• SCHRIESHEIM, C.A., Castro S.L., Zhou, X.T. ve Yammarino, F.J., (2001), “ The Folly of Theorizing “A” But Testing “B” A Selective Level-of- Analysis Review of Field and a Detailed Leader Member Exchange Illustration”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 12, s.515-551.
• SCHRIESHEIM, C.A., Castro, S.L. ve Cogliser, C.C., (1999), “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): Research: A Comprehensive Review of Theory, Measurement, and Data-Analytic Practices”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol.10, No. 1, s. 63-114.
• SCHYNS, B., Paul, T., Mohr, G., Blank, H., (2005), “Comparing Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange in a German Working Context to Findings in the US”, European Journal of Work and Organizational, Vol. 14, No. 1, s.1-22.
• SPARROW, R.T. ve Liden, R.C., (1997), “Process and Structure in Leader- Member Exchange”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, s.522-552.
• STRİNGER, L., (2006), “The Link Between the Quality of the Supervisor- Employee Relationship and the Level of the Employee’s Job Satisfaction”, Public Organizations Review, Vol.6, s.125-142.
• ŞİMŞEK, Ö.F. (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Ekinoks Yayınları, Ankara.
• VARMA, A., Srinivas, E.S. ve Stroh L.K., (2005), “A Comparative Study of the Impact of Leader-Member Exchange in US and Indian Samples”, Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, s. 84-95.
• VECCHIO, R.P., (1985), “Predicting Employee Turnover from Leader Member Exchange: A Failure to Replicate”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, s.478-485
• WAYNE, S.J. ve Green, S. A. (1993), “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impressin Management Behavior”, Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 12, s. 1431-1441.
• WAYNE, S.J., Ferris, G.R., (1990), “Influence Tactics, Affect and Exchange Quality in Supervisor- Subordinate Interactions: A Laboratory Experiment and Field Study”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 5, s.487-499.
• WAYNE, S.J., Shore, L.M. ve Liden R.C., (1997), “Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, s. 82-111.
• WILLIAMS, M.L., Podsakoff, P.M. ve Huber, V. (1992), “Effects of Group- Level and Individual-Level Variation in Leader Behaviors on Subordinate Attitudes and Performance”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 65, s. 115-129.