An analysis of the partnership principle in European cohesion policy within partnership of the regional and local governments

Year 2023, , 179 - 193, 01.12.2023

Rukiye Mehtap Özlü

https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.1254707

Abstract

European cohesion policy, also known as European economic, social, and regional cohesion policy, European regional policy, or European Union regional policy, is one of the most fundamental strategies for achieving economic, political, and social unification in Europe. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union contains rules governing this policy under the title of Economic, Social, and Territorial Cohesion. In accordance with this regulation, the Union seeks to decrease regional backwardness and the disparity between their degrees of development. In this study, the role of regional and local governments as stakeholders in the partnership principle applied in the European Cohesion Policy is examined. The purpose of this study is to clarify how local and regional governments contribute to the execution of European cohesion policy. In this regard, the study attempts to synthesize current reports and studies produced by EU institutions and bodies as well as primary legal sources relevant to this situation. The legislation based on the partnership principle under EU law is evaluated after an analysis of the historical evolution of cohesion policy in terms of the partnership concept. The role of regional and local governments, as well as their responsibilities during the cohesion policy management stages, are then explained.

Keywords

partnership, European cohesion policy, European Economic Social and Territorial Cohesion Policy, European Union Regional Policy, Regional and Local Governments

Avrupa uyum politikasında uygulanan ortaklık ilkesinin bölgesel ve yerel yönetimler paydaşlığından incelenmesi

Abstract

Öz

Avrupa ekonomik, sosyal ve bölgesel uyum politikası ya da Avrupa Birliği bölgesel politikası olarak bilinen Avrupa uyum politikası; Avrupa Birliği’nde ekonomik, siyasi ve sosyal birlik kurma düşüncesinin en temel araçlarından biridir. Bu politika, Avrupa Birliği’nin İşleyişi Hakkında Antlaşma’nın Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Yersel Uyum başlığında düzenlenmektedir. Bu düzenlemeye göre Birlik, çeşitli bölgelerin kalkınma düzeyleri arasındaki farkı ve bölgelerin geri kalmışlığını azaltmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmada; Avrupa uyum politikasında uygulanan ortaklık ilkesi, bölgesel ve yerel yönetimlerin paydaşlığı bağlamında incelenmiştir. Bölgesel ve yerel yönetimlerin Avrupa uyum politikasının uygulanmasında üstlendiği rolün izah edilmesi çalışmanın amacını oluşturmuştur. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, birincil hukuki kaynaklar ile Avrupa Birliği kurum ve organları tarafından son dönemde hazırlanan rapor ve çalışmaların bir sentezi yapılmıştır. Çalışmada; öncelikli olarak uyum politikasının tarihi gelişimi, ortaklık ilkesi özelinde kısaca incelendikten sonra Avrupa Birliği hukukunda ortaklık ilkesi düzenlemeleri değerlendirilmiştir. Ardından Avrupa uyum politikası yönetim aşamalarında bölgesel ve yerel yönetimlerin üstlendiği görev ve sorumluluk izah edilmiştir.

Keywords

bölgesel ve yerel yönetimler, Avrupa uyum politikası, Avrupa Ekonomik Sosyal ve Bölgesel Uyum Politikası, Avrupa Birliği Bölgesel Politikası, Ortaklık İlkesi

References

• Antonescu, D. (2020). New cohesion and regional policy in 2021-2027 period, MPRA Paper No. 98122, Erişim Adresi: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98122/. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2022).
• Atmaca, Y. ve Sağır, H. (2017). Avrupa Birliği Bölgesel Politikası ve Türkiye: Kalkınma Ajansları Bağlamında Bir Analiz, AÇÜ Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (2), 67-88.
• Avrupa Bölgeler Komitesi (2009). White Paper on multilevel governance, CONST-IV-020, http://web.cor.europa.eu/epp/Ourviews/Documents/White%20Paper%20on%20MLG.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2022).
• Avrupa Bölgeler Komitesi (2021). Application of the principles of partnership and multi-level governance in Cohesion Policy programming 2021-2027, Authors: Frank Holstein, Kai Böhme, Arndt Münch, Bernd Schuh, Dea Hrelja, Anda Iacob, Clarissa Amichetti ve Julian Thorsteinson (gözden geçiren) https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/Partnership_2021.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2022.
• Avrupa Ekonomik ve Sosyal Komite (2010). Exploratory Notification, Ways of encouraging efficient partnerships in the management of cohesion policy programmes, based on good practices from the 2007-2013 cycle, CESE 967/2010.
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2004). A new partnership for cohesion convergence competitiveness cooperation Third report on economic and social cohesion, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion3/cohesion3_en.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.08.2022).
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2012). Staff Working Document: The partnership principle in the implementation of the Common Strategic Framework Funds - elements for a European Code of Conduct on Partnership, Brussels, 24.4.2012, SWD(2012) 106 final http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/working/strategic_framework/swd_2012_106_en.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2022).
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2014). EC Press Releases, Structural and investment funds: Commission boosts partners' role in planning and spending, Brussels, January 7, 2014, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-5_en.htm. (Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2022).
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2016). DG REGIO Implementation of the partnership principle and multi-level governance in 2014-2020 ESI Funds. European Commission, Brussels.
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2021). La cohésion en Europe à l’horizon 2050 : Huitième rapport sur la cohésion économique, sociale et territoriale, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/fr/information/publications/communications/2022/cohesion-in-europe-towards-2050-8th-cohesion-report. (Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2022).
• Avrupa Parlamentosu (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation, (EC) No 1083/2006, {SEC(2011) 1141 final,{SEC(2011) 1142 final}, Erişim Adresi: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A7-2013-0274&language=EN. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2022).
• Avrupa Parlamentosu (2014). An Assessment of Multilevel Governance in Cohesion Policy 2007-2013, Yazarlar: Alice Radzyner, Herta Tödtling-Schönhofer, Alexandra Frangenheim, Carlos Mendez, John Bachtler, David Charles, Kaisa Granqvist, Erişim Adresi: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/514004/IPOL-REGI_ET(2014)514004_EN.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2022).
• Bachtler, J. and Michie, R. (1993). Strengthening Economic and Social Cohesion? The Revision of the Structural Funds, Regional Studies, 27(8), 719-25.
• Borz, G., Brandenburg, H., and Mendez, C. (2018). The impact of EU cohesion policy on European identity: results from the COHESIFY citizen survey. COHESIFY research paper 14, http://www.cohesify.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Cohesify-survey-report_-final1.pdf. (Erişim tarihi: 08.08.2022).
• Brunazzo, M. (2016). Chapter 1: The history and evolution of Cohesion policy, In Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Aug 20, 2022,https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781784715663/9781784715663.00014.xml. (Erişim Tarihi: 28.08.2022).
• CRPM (2015). Politique de cohésion de l’UE et le partenariat avec les régions : une réelle avancée ou un travail inachevé?, Erişim Adresi: https://cpmr.org/wpdm-package/eu-cohesion-policy-partnership-and-the-regions-a-step-forward-or-unfinished-business-cpmr-study/?wpdmdl=5489&refresh=630a3089b722c1661612169&ind=1460729681746. (Erişim Tarihi: 21.8.2022).
• Delmuth, L. M. (2011). The cash divide: the allocation of European Union regional grants, Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 1016-1033.
• Efe, H., Kemahlı F. ve Demirci E. (2018). Avrupa Birliği’nde Bölgeler Arası Gelişmişlik Farklarının Azaltılması Sorunu ve Birliğin Bölgesel Politikası, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 38, 85-12.
• Eryılmaz, B. ve Tuncer, A. (2013). Avrupa Birliği Uyum Sürecinde Bölgesel Kalkınma Politikaları: Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8 (1), 165-189.
• Europa (2022a). Paris Zirvesi Deklarasyonu, Erişim adresi: http://ec.europa.eu/dorie/fileDownload.do;jsessionid=c9npT1Bbry2fwhByyRlZqBKCDxBDHBK92SJFPTvWHmQxvhl1yjlv!-79809760?docId=341585&cardId=341585. (Erişim Tarihi: 20.08.2022).
• Europa (2022b). Regional and Urban Policy, Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/regional-and-urban-policy_en. (Erişim Tarihi: 22.08.2022).
• Europa (2022c). Cohesion policy, Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/. (Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2022).
• Hooghe, L. (1996). Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multilevel Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Jašurek, I. (2021). “Evolution of Cohesion Policy. Mission and Governance”, Journal of Public Policy and Public Administration, 12, 73-89.
• Manzella, G. P. and Mendez, C. (2009). The turning points of EU cohesion policy, Working Paper Report, Barca Report.
• Marks, G. (1993). “Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC”, In A.W. Cafruny and G.G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The State of the European Community, Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner,
• Marks, G., Hooghe L. and Blank K. (1996). “European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric V. Multilevel Governance”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 343-378.
• OECD (2020). Strengthening Governance of EU Funds under Cohesion Policy: Administrative Capacity Building Roadmaps. OECD Multi-level Governance Studies. Paris, OECD Publishing.
• Özlü, R. M. (2020). Bölgesel ve Yerel Yönetimlerin Avrupa Birliği Karar Mekanizmasına Gayri Resmi Yollardan Katılımı, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 75(3), 947-971.
• Piattoni, S. (2016). Cohesion Policy, Multilevel Governance and Democracy, In S. Piattoni and L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on cohesion policy, (63-75). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Priollaud, F.-X. (2007). Les collectivités territoriales françaises dans l’Union européenne, Les collectivités locales et l’Europe, Regards sur l’actualité, 331, 5-15.
• Stephenson, P. (2016). The Institutions and procedures of Cohesion Policy, In S. Piattoni and L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on Cohesion Policy, (36-49). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Zimakov, A. V., and Popov, E.V. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy 2021-2027: New Tools to Foster European Integration? in S. I. Ashmarina, J. Horák, J. Vrbka, P. Šuleř, (Eds), Economic Systems in the New Era: Stable Systems in an Unstable World, IES 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol 160, 148-156.
• Wostner, P. (2008). The Micro-efficiency of EU Cohesion Policy, University of Strathclyde. European Policies Research Centre, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1083477. (Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2022).
• 2081/93 sayılı Tüzük, Council Regulation (of 20 July 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments, OJ L. 193, 31.7.1993, 5-19.
• 1260/1999 sayılı Tüzük, Council Regulation of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds, OJ L 161, 26.06.1999, 1-42.
• 1083/2006 sayılı Tüzük, Council Regulation (EC) of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, 25-78.
• 1303/2013 sayılı Tüzük, the European Parliament and the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, OJ L 347/320, 20.12.2013, 320-469.
• 240/2014 sayılı Tüzük, Commission Delegated Regulation of 7 January 2014 on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds, OJ L 74, 14.3.2014, 1-7.
• 2021/1060 sayılı Tüzük, the European Parliament and the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, OJ L 231, 30.6.2021, 159-706.