This study aims to present a critical portrayal of teaching geopolitics at Turkish
universities by assessing both undergraduate and graduate levels of Political
Science and International Relations (IR) curricula. Geopolitical analysis has gone
through several phases and traditions by conceiving space as a crucial element
for representing world politics. In addition to interstate rivalries, geopolitics also
refers to many conflicts and rivalries within an intrastate framework in the context
of multiple territorial scales. While geopolitics seems to be falsely perceived as
something equal to a state-centric and hard realist academic subfield under a
strong military tutelage in Turkey, it lacks a broad multi-level analysis, as well
as geographical and historical reasoning. In this study, I propose to consider
cartography, territoriality, and geopolitical representations, which form the
basis of contemporary geopolitical analysis. The article evaluates weekly
schedules, learning outcomes, content, and objectives of the courses available
on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) information
packages on university websites. Based on a qualitative case study, it eventually
aims to improve the methodological character of geopolitics teaching, indirectly
influencing the level and quality of geopolitics in Turkey.
Geopolitics Political Science and International Relations (IR) Curricula Teaching Methodology Turkey
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | International Relations Theories, International Relations (Other) |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | January 16, 2024 |
Publication Date | January 24, 2024 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 |
Widening the World of IR