Can the accommodation of rising powers in the
international system be accomplished peacefully? Prof. Paul, in his recent publication,
argued that if the established and status quo powers hold grand strategies which
allow for peaceful accommodation, this is feasible. He clarifies the
differences between accommodation and appeasement and the value of soft balancing,
relying on institutions, economic diplomacy, and limited ententes as mechanisms
for restraining aggressive behavior of major powers. Variations in current US
policies toward Russia and China are discussed. Non-accommodation of major
powers as well as minor powers has major internal and external consequences. He
concludes by arguing that contemporary rising powers, such as China and India,
have much greater prospects of rising peacefully than previous era great
powers, partially due to the opportunities offered by the globalization
process. However, these states must initiate economic and developmental
programs for other states, without neocolonial overtones, in order to increase global
development and their own status. The discipline of IR has a special duty to
encourage students and policy makers to develop strategies of peaceful transformation,
rather than war, as the main mechanism of change.
Rising powers Peaceful change India China Russi Change the US
Journal Section | Commentary |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 1, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 |
Widening the World of IR