Foregrounding the Complexities of a Dialogic Approach to Global International Relations

Year 2020, , 163 - 176, 30.06.2020

Deepshikha Shahi

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.725230

Cited By: 3

Abstract

The ever more global character of today’s International Relations (IR) is no longer satisfied with one-sided stories about how things have gone with either the West or the non-West. Rather, the ongoing discussions on Global IR persuade both the West and the non-West to squarely unfold their own narratives. As the theories and practices of contemporary international relations have remarkably acquired a ‘Global’ impetus, a lot of premium is being put on a ‘dialogic approach’ – that is, an approach to Global IR that insists upon a deeper two-way communicative-action between the West and the non-West. Although the dialogic approach to Global IR seeks to resolve a wide range of cognitive differences between the West and the non-West, it more often than not remains thwarted by a few unsettled contestations: (i) History vs. Philosophy, (ii) Chronology vs. Covariance, (iii) Language vs. Concept, (iv) Culture vs. Economy, and (v) Single vs. Plural. This paper sets out to shed light on these unsettled contestations in an endeavour to intellectually improve the prospects of a dialogic approach to Global IR.

Keywords

Global IR, Eurocentrism, Dialogue, Western IR, non-Western IR

References

• Acharya, Amitav. “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 619-637.
• –––. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647-59.
• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• Alker, Hayward R. “The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue.” The American Political Science Review 82, no. 3 (1988): 805-820.
• Anievas, Alexander. “On Habermas, Marx and the Critical Theory Tradition: Theoretical Mastery or Drift?.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues, edited by C. Moore and C. Farrands, 144–156. London: Routledge, 2010.
• Balci. Ali. “Knowledge, Repetition and Power in Ibn al-’Arabi’s Thought: Some Preliminary Comments on Methodology.” All Azimuth 4, no. 1 (2015): 39-50.
• Banchoff, Thomas. “Religion and the Global Politics of Human Dignity.” In Human Dignity and the Future of Global Institutions, edited by Mark P. Lagon and Anthony Clark Arend, 257–276. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2014.
• Behr, Hartmut., and Michael C. Williams “Interlocuting Classical Realism and Critical Theory: Negotiating ‘Divides’ in International Relations Theory.” Journal of International Political Theory 13, no. 1 (2017): 3-17.
• Bhambra, Gurminder K. “Talking Among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues Without ‘Others’.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 667-681.
• Biebuyck, William, and Judith Meltzer. “Cultural Political Economy”. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Biersteker, Thomas J. “Eroding Boundaries, Contested Terrain.” International Studies Review 1 (1999): 3-9.
• Blanshard, Brand. The Nature of Thought (2 volumes). London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1939.
• Bohm, David. On Dialogue. London: Routledge, 1996.
• Capan, Zeynep G. “Decolonising International Relations?” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 1 (2017): 1-15.
• Chatterjee, Partha. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. London: Zed Books, 1986.
• Curtis, Simon, and Marjo Koivisto. “Towards a Second ‘Second Debate’? Rethinking the Relationship between Science and History in International Theory.” International Relations 24, no. 4 (2010): 433-455.
• Der Derian, James. Critical Practices in International Theory: Selected Essays. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
• de Souza, Teotónio R. “Machiavelli, A Modern European Avatar of Kautilya.” 2011. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Machiavelli%2C-a-Modern-European-Avatar-of-Kautilya-Souza/b51d9e73d8b14bad3ba1cda38600c9108cec9880.
• Diez, Thomas, and Jill Steans. “A Useful Dialogue? Habermas and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 31 (2005): 127-140.
• Dufresne, Todd, and Clara Sacchetti. eds. The Economy as Cultural System: Theory, Capitalism, Crisis. New York: Bloomsbury, 2012.
• Eun, Yong-Soo. “Beyond ‘the West/non-West Divide’ in IR: How to Ensure Dialogue as Mutual Learning.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11, no. 4 (2018): 435-449.
• Grovogui, Siba N. Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
• Guillaume, Xavier. “Bakhtin: From Substance to Process.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues, edited by C. Moore and C. Farrands. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
• Harpaz, Guy. “The Role of Dialogue in Reflecting and Constituting International Relations: The Causes and Consequences of a Deficient European-Israeli Dialogue.” Review of International Studies 37, no. 4 (2011): 1857-1883.
• Hellmann, Gunther. “Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 123-150.
• Hermann, Margaret G. “One Field, Many Perspectives: Building the Foundations for Dialogue.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (1998): 605-624.
• Hobson, John M. “East and West in Global History.” Theory, Culture & Society 23, no. 2-3 (2006): 408-410.
• Hobson, John M. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
• Hobson, John M., and Alina Sajed. “Navigating Beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency.” International Studies Review 19, no. 4 (2017): 547-572.
• Hutchings, Kimberly. “Dialogue between Whom? The Role of the West/ Non-West Distinction in Promoting Global Dialogue in IR.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 639-647.
• Jones, Branwen G. ed. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
• Kayaoglu, Turan. “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 12, no. 2 (2010): 193-217.
• Köchler, Hans, and Gudrun Grabher. eds. Civilizations – Conflict or Dialogue?. Vienna: International Progress Organization, 1999.
• Korab-Karpowicz, Włodzimierz J. “How International Relations Theorists Can Benefit by Reading Thucydides.” The Monist 89, no. 2 (2006): 232-44.
• Kratochwil, Friedrich V. “Politics, Norms and Peaceful Change.” Review of International Studies (The Eighty Years’ Crisis 1919-1999) 24 (1998): 193-218.
• Kratochwil, Friedrich. The Puzzles of Politics: Inquiries into the Genesis and Transformation of International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2010.
• Kristensen, Peter M. “International relations in China and Europe: The Case for Interregional Dialogue in a Hegemonic Discipline.” The Pacific Review 28, no. 2 (2014): 161-187.
• Lacatus, Cora, Daniel Schade and Yuan Yao. “Quo vadis IR: Method, Methodology and Innovation.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 3 (2015): 767-78.
• Lapid, Yosef. “Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate.” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 128-31.
• Liebig, Michael. “Statecraft and Intelligence Analysis in the Kautilya-Arthashastra.” Journal of Defence Studies 8, no. 4 (2014): 27-54.
• Linklater, Andrew. “The Changing Contours of Critical International Relations Theory.” In Critical Theory and World Politics, edited by Richard Wyn Jones. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2001.
• Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Revolt Against Dualism. Chicago: Open Ccourt Publishing, 1930.
• Malmvig, Helle. “Security through Intercultural Dialogue? Implications of the Securitization of Euro-Mediterranean Dialogue between Cultures.” Mediterranean Politics 10, no. 3 (2005): 349-64.
• Messner, Dirk. During a formal discussion at the international conference on Futures of Global Cooperation. Centre for Global Cooperation Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, 8-10 November, 2017.
• Mignolo, Walter D. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011.
• Moravcsik, Andrew. “Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical.” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 131-36.
• Muller, Harald. “Arguing, Bargainig and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 3 (2004): 395-435.
• Neumann, Iver B. “International Relations as Emergent Bakhtinian Dialogue.” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 137-40.
• Paolini, Albert J. Navigating Modernity: Postcolonialism, Identity, and International Relations. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
• Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
• Pieczara, Kamila. “Two Modes of Dialogue in IR : Testing on Western versus Non-Western Engagement with IR Theory.” Millennium Annual Conference, London School of Economics (2010): 1-17.
• Rösch, Felix, and Atsuko Watanabe. “Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourses through Basso Ostinato?” European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 3 (2016): 609-29.
• Rosenau, James N. Global Voices: Dialogues in International Relations. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.
• Sabaratnam, Meera. “IR in Dialogue. But Can We Change the Subjects? ATypology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 781-803.
• Schmidt, Brian C. “A Realist View of the Eurocentric Conception of World Politics.” Millennium:Journal of International Studies 42, no. 2 (2014): 464-71.
• Shah, Ghanshyam. Re-reading Hind Swaraj : Modernity and Subalterns. New Delhi: Routledge, 2013.
• Shahi, Deepshikha. Advaita as a Global International Relations Theory. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
• –––. “Introducing Sufism to International Relations Theory: A Preliminary Inquiry into Epistemological, Ontological, and Methodological Pathways.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2018): 250-75.
• –––. Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
• Shahi, Deepshikha, and Gennaro Ascione. “Rethinking the Absence of post–Western International Relations Theory in India: ‘Advaitic Monism’ as an Alternative Epistemological Resource.” European Journal of International Relations 22, no. 2 (2016): 313–34.
• Shapcott, Richard. Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
• Shimizu, Kosuke. “The Genealogy of Culturalist International Relations in Japan and Its Implications for Post-Western Discourse.” All Azimuth 7, no. 1 (2018): 121-36.
• Sil, Rudra, and, Peter Katzenstein. “Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (2010): 411-31.
• Snyder, Jack. “One World, Rival Theories.” Foreign Policy 145 (2004): 52-62.
• Sprinz, Detlef F., and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias. Cases, Numbers, Models: International Relations Research Methods. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2002. Tickner, Arlene B. Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32, no. 2 (2003): 295-324.
• Tickner, Arlene B., and David L. Blaney. Claiming the International. New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Tickner, Judith A. “Dealing with Difference: Problems and Possibilities for Dialogue in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2013): 607-18.
• Tieku, Thomas K. “Collectivist Worldview: Its Challenge to International Relations.” In Africa and International Relations in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Fantu Cheru, Timothy Shaw, and Scarlett Cornelissen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
• Tingyang, Zhao. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’.” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (2006): 29-41.
• Tuna, Agnes. “Intercultural Dialogue: Only a Means, Not an End in Itself. New-Med Research Network”, 2016. https://www.osce.org/networks/newmedtrackII/292946?download=true
• Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687-727.
• Williams, Bernard. Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
• Young, Iris M. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
• Žižek, Slavoj. “The Most Sublime of Hysterics: Hegel with Lacan”, 2006. http://www.lacan.com/zizlacan2.htm