This article intends to analyze the use of comparative
historical analysis (CHA) in the discipline of International Relations (IR).
After describing the historical evolution and fundamental premises of CHA, the article
continues with the classification of CHA. Then the strengths and weaknesses of
the method as well as its utilization by various theories of IR are discussed.
The second part of the article deals with the employment of CHA by the author
of this article in his own research design, in order to give an idea that how CHA
might contribute to a better understanding of the “international”. In doing
that, the advantages and disadvantages of the method are revisited in a way to
show the contributions provided as well as the difficulties encountered in
practice. The article concludes that CHA might contribute to the study of IR by
enhancing interdisciplinary approaches and by adding a socio-historical depth
to the ‘international’, which helps to overcome historicism and presentism at
the same time.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | July 1, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
Manuscripts submitted for consideration must follow the style on the journal’s web page.The manuscripts should not be submitted simultaneously to any other publication, nor may they have been previously published elsewhere in English. However, articles that are published previously in another language but updated or improved can be submitted. For such articles, the author(s) will be responsible in seeking the required permission for copyright. Manuscripts may be submitted via Submission Form found at: http://www.allazimuth.com/authors-guideline/. For any questions please contact: allazimuth@bilkent.edu.tr