Does Managerial Decisions Affect Efficiency Profiles of Intermediary Institutions? Evidence from Emerging Economy

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 249 - 262, 31.12.2019

Güler Aras , Nuray Tezcan , Özlem Kutlu Furtuna

https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.628074

Abstract

Intermediary institutions have been at the heart of financial systems in efficient allocation of resources in emerging economies and a reliable assessment of that system is a prerequisite to managerial decision-making. After more than 30 years of development, the capital market system has been basically formulated in Turkey, and the intermediary institutions have experienced a rapid development as well. However, due to the late start of intermediary institutions development in Turkish capital markets, empirical evidence on the efficiency profiles of them is quite scarce and comprehensive efficiency evaluation process has been required.

The main purpose of the research is to assess the efficiency profiles and productivity change of Turkish intermediary institutions during the years 2005 and 2016 using a comprehensive framework based on survey results, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index. Based on DEA findings, that unique dataset allows to analyse that intermediary institutions in Turkey have highest efficiency scores in terms of scale efficiency. Furthermore, listed ones are significantly more technical, pure technical and scale efficient than their non-listed peers. According to Malmquist index, listed intermediary institutions have more stable in terms of total productivity change than the others during the observation period. Both for the groups, the volatility in technological change is higher than the other efficiency changes. Empirical findings evidence that, on average, the intermediary institutions operating in Turkey have not yet to enhance optimum levels of technical efficiency.

That study may provide a starting point for further investigation and validation into the efficiency of the Turkish intermediary institutions. This strand of research could provide significant information for policy makers for enhancing the level of technological efficiency as well.

Keywords

Intermediary Institutions, Data Envelopment Analysis, Efficiency, Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index, Turkey

Supporting Institution

Turkish Capital Markets Association

Thanks

This study was supported by Turkish Capital Markets Association (TCMA), under the project titled “Performance and Efficiency Analysis of the Intermediary Institutions in Turkish Capital Markets”.

References

• References
• Aras G., Tezcan N., Kutlu Furtuna O, 2018 “Comprehensive evaluation of the financial performance for intermediary institutions based on multi-criteria decision making method”, Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 2, 1:37-49.
• Aras G., Tezcan N., Kutlu Furtuna O., Hacıoglu Kazak, E., 2018a. Performance and Efficiency Analysis Analysis of the Intermediary Institutitons in Turkish Capital Markets, TSPB Publishing, 85, ISBN: 978-975-6483-61-9
• Aras G., Tezcan N., Kutlu Furtuna O., Hacıoglu Kazak, E., 2018b. Structural Situation Research in Turkish Capital Markets Intermediary Institutions, TSPB Publishing, No.84, ISBN: 978-975-6483-60-2
• Azad A.S.M., Yasushi S., Fang V., Ahsan A. 2014. “Impact of policy changes on the efficiency and returns-to-scale of Japanese financial institutions: An evaluation”, Research in International Business and Finance, 32: 159–171
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. 1984 “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30, 9:1078-1092.
• Banker R.D., Thrall R.M. 1992. “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 74-84.
• Bayram N. 2016 “Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği: Aracı Kurumlar Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2: 7-44.
• Berger, A. N., Humphrey D. B. 1997. “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research”, European Journal of Operational Research, 98:175–212.
• Bibi U., Balli H.O., Matthews C.D., Tripe C.D.L. 2018. “Impact of Gender and Governance on Microfinance Efficiency”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions& Money 53, 307–319.
• Bowlin, W.F.1998. “Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis”, The Journal of The Cost Analysis, 15,2: 3-27.
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. 1978. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 6: 429–444.
• Cooper W.W., Li S., Seiford L.M., Tone K., Thrall R.M., Zhu J. 2001. “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developmets”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15: 217-246.
• Cummins J. D., Weiss M. A., Xie X., Zi H. 2010. “Economies of scope in financial services: A DEA efficiency analysis of the US insurance industry”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34: 1525–1539
• Dinçer M.R. 2010. Türkiyede Sermaye Piyasası Aracı Kurumlarının Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Analizi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Unpublished PhD Dissertation.
• Dyson R.G., Allen R., Camanho A.S., Podinovski V.V., Sarrico C.S., Shale E.A. 2001 “Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA”, European Journal of Operational Research, 132: 245-259
• Farrell, M. J. 1957. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120,3: 253–282.
• Fukuyama H., Weber W. L. 1999. “The Efficiency and Productivity of Japanese Securities Firms, 1988-93”, Japan and the World Economy 11, 115-133
• Garcia, M.T.M. 2010. “Efficiency evaluation of the Portuguese pension funds management companies”, Journal of International. Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 20: 259–266.
• Gündüz, L., Yılmaz M.K., Yılmaz C. 2001. “Türkiye’deki Aracı Kurumların Performans Analizi (1993-1998): Kantitatif Bir Değerlendirme”, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1, 3: 38-53.
• Huicken J. 2017. “Efficiency Research on China Listed Securities Companies”, 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference
• Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.
• Kargın M., Aktaş H. 2007. "Türk Sermaye Piyasasindaki Araci Kurumların Etkinlik ve Verimliligi", İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 11, 9: 97-117.
• Lao, G.H. and Mo, B. 2018. “Study on the Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of China’s Securities Companies—Based on Hicks-Moorsteen TFP Index Method”, Technology and Investment, 9: 52-67.
• Levine, R. 1997. “Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 2:688-726.
• Levine, R., Loayza, N. and Beck, T. 2000. “Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 1: 31-77.
• Paradi J.C., Zhu H. 2013. “A Survey on Bank Branch Efficiency and Performance Research with Data Envelopment Analysis”, Omega, 41:61–79
• Turkish Capital Markets Association (TCMA) (2018), Handbook of Turkish Capital Markets, TCMA Publication, Turkey.
• Worthington A. C. .1999. “Malmquist indices of productivity change in Australian financial Services”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 9:303–320
• Wu D., Wu D.D., 2010. "Performance Evaluation and Risk Analysis of Online BankingService", Kybernetes, 39, 5:723-734
• Zhou X., XuZ., Chai J., Yao L., Wang S., Lev B. 2018. “Efficiency Evaluation for Banking Systems Under Uncertainty: A Multi-period Three-stage DEA Model”, Omega, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.012