Küresel Tedarikçi Riskine Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: Finans Temelli Bir Model Önerisi

Year 2019, ULUK 2018 Congress Special Issue, 11 - 24, 31.12.2019

Oylum Şehvez Ergüzel , Hakan Tunahan , Sinan Esen

https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.513136

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Küreselleşmeyle birlikte artan rekabet, çok uluslu şirketleri ve tedarikçilerini rekabet avantajı sağlayabilmeleri amacıyla, özellikle maliyet etkin çözümler bulmaya yönlendirmiştir. Bu yönelim, işletmelerin üretimlerini kısmi olarak daha düşük maliyetli pazarlara kaydırmalarına neden olmuştur. Ancak bu yaklaşım, özellikle tedarikte öngörülemeyen ve gömülü maliyetleri ve riskleri göz ardı etmektedir Bu nedenle “En İyi Ülkeden Tedarik Stratejisi” gittikçe önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, “En İyi Ülkeden Tedarik Stratejisi” kapsamında tedarikçilerin seçiminde risklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir model önerisi sunmaktır. Oluşturulan model ile 11 Avrupa Birliği ülkesinde yerleşik KOBİ’leri etkileyen ülkeye ve firmalara özgü mali riskler ve küresel riskler 2006-2016 yılları arasında bulanık mantık yöntemi ile analize tabi tutulmuştur.

Keywords

Küresel Tedarik, Tedarikçi Riski

A Different Approach to Global Supplier Risk: A Finance Based Model

Abstract

Increased competition with globalization has led multinational companies and suppliers to find cost-effective solutions to ensure competitive advantage. This tendency causes enterprises to shift their production to partially lower-cost markets. However, this approach ignores unpredictable and hidden costs and risks, especially in supply. Therefore, “The Strategy of Best Cost Country Sourcing“ has begun to gain importance. The aim of this study is to propose a model for the determination of the risks in the selection of suppliers under the “Best Cost Country Sourcing Strategy”. With the model, firm specific financal risks, national specific financial risks and global risks affecting Small and Medium Size Enterprices (SMEs) in 11 European Union countries were analyzed with the fuzzy logic method between 2006-2016.

Küreselleşmeyle birlikte artan rekabet, çok uluslu şirketleri ve tedarikçilerini rekabet avantajı sağlayabilmeleri amacıyla, özellikle maliyet etkin çözümler bulmaya yönlendirmiştir. Bu yönelim, işletmelerin üretimlerini kısmi olarak daha düşük maliyetli pazarlara kaydırmalarına neden olmuştur. Ancak bu yaklaşım, özellikle tedarikte öngörülemeyen ve gömülü maliyetleri ve riskleri göz ardı etmektedir Bu nedenle “En İyi Ülkeden Tedarik Stratejisi” gittikçe önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, “En İyi Ülkeden Tedarik Stratejisi” kapsamında tedarikçilerin seçiminde risklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir model önerisi sunmaktır. Oluşturulan model ile 11 Avrupa Birliği ülkesinde yerleşik KOBİ’leri etkileyen ülkeye ve firmalara özgü mali riskler ve küresel riskler 2006-2016 yılları arasında bulanık mantık yöntemi ile analize tabi tutulmuştur.

Keywords

Global Sourcing, Supplier Risk, Supplier Selection, Country Risk, Supplier Financial Risk

References

• Alard, R., Bremen, P., Oehmen, J. and Schneider, C. (2009). Total cost of ownership considerations in global sourcing processes. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 491-498.
• Awasthi, S.,G.,A. (2015). Sustainable global supplier selection extended towards sustainability risks from (1+n)th tier suppliers using fuzzy AHP based approach, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), pp.966-971.
• Chen, I.J., Paulraj, A, (2004) Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements, Journal of Operations Management 22(2). pp 119-150
• Christopher, M., Mena, C., Khan, O. and Yurt, O. (2011). Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), pp.67-81.
• Dev, A. (2017). Metamorphosis of BCC sourcing: The future of procurement. [Online] My purchasing center.
• Dutzler, H. et al. (2011). Best-cost country sourcing. A next generation approach. [Online] Formerly Booz & Company
• Ellram, L.M. (1993). Total cost of ownership: Elements and Implementation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(4).
• Ellram, L.M. and Siferd, S.P. (1993) Purchasing: The cornerstone of the total cost of Ownership concept. Journal of Business Logistics 14(1), pp.163-184.
• Hanna, V., Jackson, J., (2015). An examination of the strategic and operational impact of global sourcing on UK small firms. Production, Planning Control. 26 (10), pp.786–798.
• Hätönen, J., Eriksson, T., (2009). 30+ years of research and practice of outsourcing–exploring the past and anticipating the future. Journal of International Management, 15 (2), pp.142-155.
• Holcomb, T.R., Hitt, M.A., (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Oper. Management. 25 (2), pp.464–481.
• Holweg, M., Reichhart, A., Hong, A. (2011). On risk and cost in global sourcing, Int. J. Production Economics 131 . pp. 333–341
• Javalgi, R.R.G., Dixit, A., Scherer, R.F., (2009). Outsourcing to emerging markets: theoretical perspectives and policy implications. Journal of International Management. 15 (2), pp. 156–168
• Kusaba, K., Moser, R., Rodrigues, A.M., (2011). Low-cost country sourcing competence: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 47 (4), pp.73–93.
• Lockström, M. (2006). Low-cost country sourcing. trends and ımplications. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Lund-Thomsen P., Lindgreen, A., (2014). A corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), pp. 11-22
• Mc Kensay&Company. (2015). Poland2 2025: Europe’s New Growth Engine.
• Meldrum D.H. (2000). Country risk and foreign direct ınvestment. Business Economics, 35(1), pp.33– 40.
• Monczka, R.M., Giunipero, L.C., 1984. International purchasing: characteristics and implementation. Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management 20 (3), pp.2–9.
• Monczka, R.M., Trent, R., and Handfield, R. (2005). Purchasing and supply management. 3rd Ed. London: Thomson South-Western.
• Nassimbeni, G., 2006. International sourcing: empirical evidence from a sample of Italian firms. International Journal of Production Economics 103 (2), pp. 694–706
• Ruamsook, K., Russell, D.M., Thomchick, E.A., (2009). Sourcing from low-cost countries: identifying sourcing issues and prioritizing impacts on logistics performance. International Journal of Logistic. Management. 20 (1), pp.79–96.
• Sawik T. (2001). Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 39, pp.194–208
• Schneider, C.O., Bremen, P., Schönsleben, P., Alard, R., (2013). Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: assessing regional differences and implications for performance International Journal of Production Economics. 141 (1), pp.243–254.
• Tunahan, H., Esen, S., Takıl, D. (2016). Havayolu şirketlerinin finansal risk düzeylerinin bulanık mantık yöntemi ile karşılaştırmalı analizi, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies 2/2 pp.239-264
• Vos, F.G., Scheffler, P., Schiele, H., Horn, P., (2016). Does global sourcing pay-off? A competitive dynamics perspective. Journal of Purchaser Supply Management. 22 (4), pp.338–350.
• Weber, M., Hiete, M., Lauer, L., Rentz, O., (2010). Low cost country sourcing and its effects on the total cost of ownership structure for a medical devices manufacturer. Journal of Purchaser Supply Management. 16 (1), pp. 4–16.
• World Economic Forum. (2018). Global Risk Report. Online: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2018
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets (electronic version). Information and Control, 8(3), pp.338- 353.
• Poland-in. https://polandin.com/36756890/expert-poland-notes-recordhigh-fdi-in-2017Available: 16.11.2018