COVİD-19 Pandemisinde Radyolojik Değerlendirme

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 153 - 157, 29.12.2021

Ali Batur , Selin Ardalı Düzgün , Bülent Erbil Erhan Akpınar

https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1037444

Abstract

COVİD-19 pandemisinin başlangıcından bu yana sağlık hizmetlerine erişimin zorlaşması, kaynakların etkin kullanımı için yapılan planlamalar, sağlık kurumlarına başvurularında sayısındaki ciddi artış, yüksek bulaşıcılık oranları, dekontaminasyon maliyet ve süreleri gibi değişkenler sebebiyle görüntüleme yöntemlerinin kullanımı açısından farklılıklar ortaya çıkmıştır. Özellikle COVİD-19 pandemisinin başlangıcında Amerikan Radyoloji Derneği (ACR) yayınladığı bildiri ile özellikle bilgisayarlı tomofrafi (BT) uygulaması sonrası dekontaminasyon sürecinin radyolojik hizmetlerin sunumunda aksamalar oluşturacağını, çapraz enfeksiyon riskini ve bulaş olasılığını artıracağını beyan etmiştir. Bu sebeple pandeminin ilk aylarında ACR COVİD-19 hastalarının taşınabilir cihazlarla çekilen direkt göğüs grafileri ile değerlendirilmesini önermiştir. Ancak ilerleyen zamanda toraks BT’nin tanı koymadaki duyarlılığının yüksekliği sebebiyle Covid-19 hastalarının yönetiminde BT yaygın olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır.

COVİD-19 pnömonisinin tipik bulguları, ağırlıklı olarak bazal ve posterior kesimlerde, subplevral yerleşimli buzlu cam dansiteleri, buzlu cam dansitelerine süperpoze olan intra/interlobüler septal kalınlaşmaların yol açtığı “arnavut kaldırımı” bulgusu ve konsolidasyonlardır. Buna ek olarak hava bronkogramları ve vasküler genişleme bulguları da eşlik edebilir. Bu bulgular direkt grafi, ultrasonografi ve bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) aracılığıyla değerlendirilebilir.

Sonuç olarak hizmet sunum şartları, hasta sayıları, maliyet, teknik yeterlilik ve hasta yönetim planları gibi değişkenler sebebiyle COVİD-19 pnömoni yönetiminde kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemleri farklılıklar göstermiştir. Mevcut durumda halen COVİD-19 vakaları için kesin tanıya ulaştıran görüntüleme yöntemi yoktur. Mevcut görüntüleme yöntemleri sağlık hizmeti sunulan kurumun ve hizmet verilen hastaların özelliklerine göre değişkenlik gösterecektir. Bu değişkenlere uygun görüntüleme yöntemlerinin tercih edilmesi uygun olacaktır.

Keywords

COVİD-19, yatak başı ultrasonografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi, direkt grafi, radyoloji

Radiological Evaluation in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been differences in the use of imaging methods due to variables such as the difficulty of accessing health services, the planning made for the efficient use of resources, the significant increase in the number of admissions, high rates of contagiousness, cost, and duration of decontamination. Especially at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiology (ACR) declared in its statement that the decontamination process, especially after the application of computed tomography, would cause disruptions in the delivery of radiological services, increase the risk of cross-infection and the possibility of transmission. For this reason, in the first months of the Pandemic, ACR recommended that COVID-19 patients be evaluated with portable direct chest radiographs. However, in the following period, the frequency of use of thorax CT increased due to its high sensitivity in diagnosis.

Typical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia are subpleural ground-glass densities, a “cobblestone” sign caused by intra/interlobular septal thickenings superposed to ground glass densities, and consolidations, predominantly in the basal and posterior segments. In addition, air bronchograms and signs of vascular enlargement may accompany. These findings can be evaluated by X-ray, ultrasonography, and computed tomography.

As a result, imaging methods used in the management of COVID-19 pneumonia differed due to variables such as service delivery conditions, number of patients, cost, technical competence, and patient management plans. Currently, there is no imaging method that leads to a definitive diagnosis for COVID-19 cases. Available imaging methods will vary according to the characteristics of the institution and the patients. It would be appropriate to choose imaging methods suitable for these variables.

Keywords

Covid-19, bedside ultrasonography, computed tomography, plain radiography, radiology

References

• Poggiali EDA, Bastoni D, Tinelli V, et al. Can lung ultrasound help critical care clinicians in the early diagnosis of novel coronavirus (COVİD-19) pneumonia? Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):E6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200847. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
• Peng QY, Wang XT, Zhang LN, CCUSG. Findings of lung ultrasonography of novel corona virus pneumonia during 2019-2020 epidemic. Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):849-850. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05996-6. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
• Tao Ai ZY, Hongyan Hou, et.al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVİD-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642.
• ACR recommendations for the use of chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) for suspected COVİD-19 infection|American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/Advocacy-and-Economics/ACR-Position-Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection. Accessed March 22, 2020. Google Scholar 2020.
• Buosenso DPD, Chiaretti A. COVİD-19 outbreak: less stethoscope, more ultrasound. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):e27. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30120-X.
• Cao AM, Choy JP, Mohanakrishnan LN, et al. Chest radiographs for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(12):CD009119. Published 2013 Dec 26. Doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009119.pub2
• Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AHT, et al. Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in COVİD-19 Positive Patients. Radiology. 2020;296(2):72-78. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020201160.
• Ng M.Y., Lee E., Yang J. Imaging profile of the COVİD-19 infection: radiologic findings and literature review. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200034. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200034.
• Borakati A, Perera A, Johnson J, Sood T. Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVİD-19: a propensity-matched database study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):042946.
• Nazerian P, Volpicelli G, Vanni S, et al. Accuracy of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of consolidations when compared to chest computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(5):620–625.
• Mongodi S, Bonaiti S, Stella A, et al. Lung ultrasound for daily monitoring and management of ARDS patients. Clinic Pulm Med. 2019;26(3):92–97.
• Testa A, Soldati G, Copetti R, et al. Early recognition of the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia by chest ultrasound. Crit Care. 2012;16(1):R30.
• Amatya Y, Rupp J, Russell FM, et al. Diagnostic use of lung ultrasound compared to chest radiograph for suspected pneumonia in a resource-limited setting. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11(1):8.
• Abrams ER, Rose G, Fields JM, Esener D. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Evaluation of COVİD-19. J Emerg Med 2020; 59:403.
• Peng QY, Wang XT, Zhang LN, Chinese Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group (CCUSG). Findings of lung ultrasonography of novel corona virus pneumonia during the 2019-2020 epidemic. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:849.
• Bar S, Lecourtois A, Diouf M, et al. The association of lung ultrasound images with COVİD-19 infection in an emergency room cohort. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1620.
• Manivel V, Lesnewski A, Shamim S, et al. CLUE: COVİD-19 lung ultrasound in emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Aug;32(4):694-696. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13546. Epub 2020 Jun 16. PMID: 32386264; PMCID: PMC7273052.
• Gandhi D, Jain N, Khanna K, et al. Current role of imaging in COVİD-19 infection with recent recommendations of point of care ultrasound in the contagion: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Sep;8(17):1094. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3043. PMID: 33145313; PMCID: PMC7576001.
• Moore S, Gardiner E. Point of care and intensive care lung ultrasound: A reference guide for practitioners during COVİD-19. Radiography (Lond). 2020 Nov;26(4):e297-e302. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 17. PMID: 32327383; PMCID: PMC7164867.
• Adams HJA, Kwee TC, Yakar D, et al. Systematic Review and Meta Analysis on the Value of Chest CT in the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease (COVİD-19): Sol Scientiae, Illustra Nos. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(6):1342-50. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23391.
• Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVİD-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection. Radiology. 2020;295(3):200463.
• Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, et al. Temporal Changes of CT Findings in 90 Patients with COVİD-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study. Radiology. 2020;296(2):55-64.
• Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, et al. The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVİD-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology.2020;296(1):172–80. https://doi.org/101148/radiol2020201365.
• Zhou Z, Guo D, Li C, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019: initial chest CT findings. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(8):4398-4406. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06816-7.
• Han X, Fan Y, Alwalid O, et al. Six-month Follow-up Chest CT Findings after Severe COVİD-19 Pneumonia. Radiology. 2021;299(1):177–86.
• Duzgun SA, Durhan G, Demirkazik B, et al. COVİD-19 pneumonia: the great radiological mimicker. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00933-z.
• Cozzi D, Cavigli E, Moroni C, et al. Ground-glass opacity (GGO): a review of the differential diagnosis in the era of COVİD-19. Jpn J Radiol. 2021;39(8):721-732. doi:10.1007/s11604-021-01120-w.
• Liu F, Zhang Q, Huang C, et al. CT quantification of pneumonia lesions in early days predicts progression to severe illness in a cohort of COVİD-19 patients. Theranostics. 2020;10(12):5613–22.
• Shen C, Yu N, Cai S, et al. Quantitative computed tomography analysis for stratifying the severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Pharm Anal. 2020;10(2):123–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.03.004.
• Poyiadji N, Cormier P, Patel PY, et al. Acute Pulmonary Embolism and COVİD-19. Radiology. 2020;297(3):335-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201955