The effect of the golden ratio in facial anatomy on beauty perception

Year 2024, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 40 - 50, 30.08.2024

Erdi İmre , Ali Yılmaz

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the influence of the golden ratio on aesthetic perception, focusing on facial features such as the nasal index, nasooral ratio, and upper-to-lower lip thickness ratio. The aim is to identify patterns in individuals’ aesthetic preferences and examine correlations with demographic factors such as gender, educational background, and interest in visual arts.
Methods: Facial images, both digitally altered and hand-drawn, were manipulated to create variations in anthropometric measurements. A questionnaire featuring these images was distributed among adults in various social settings. Statistical analyses included chi-squared tests to compare aesthetic preferences across demographic groups and correlation coefficients to assess the relationships between binary aesthetic choices and demographic factors.
Results: Significant differences in aesthetic preferences were found based on respondents’ educational background and interest in visual arts. Males exhibited a stronger preference for golden ratio proportions in nasal and nasooral features, while females demonstrated more variable preferences depending on the specific facial feature. Higher education levels and greater interest in visual arts were consistently associated with a stronger inclination towards selecting golden ratio proportions.
Conclusion: Education and exposure to the arts significantly influence aesthetic preferences, highlighting the impact of social factors on beauty perception. The use of digitally manipulated and hand-drawn images provided a controlled setting for testing the golden ratio and other proportions, ensuring consistency in the study. Future research incorporating real-life images may further enhance our understanding of the mechanisms behind aesthetic perception.

Keywords

aesthetic anatomy, aesthetic perception, facial features, golden ratio, visual arts

References

• Önal T. Evaluation of university students’ anthropometric face measurements by using photographic analysis methods in terms of artistic anatomy [Doctoral dissertation] Trakya University, Edirne; 2014:1–98.
• Peron APLM, Morosini IC, Correia KR, Moresca R, Petrelli E. Photometric study of divine proportion and its correlation with facial attractiveness. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2012;17:124–31.
• Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K, Shaw W, Richmond S. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:676–82.
• Iosa M, Morone G, Paolucci S. Phi in physiology, psychology and biomechanics: the golden ratio between myth and science. Biosystems 2018;165:31–9.
• Ünver G. In terms of artistic anatomy effect to aesthetic perception of face morphometry [Master’s dissertation]. Trakya University, Edirne; 2017:1–91.
• Turkish Statistical Institute. Education level in Türkiye. [Internet]. [Retrieved on May 08, 2022]. Available from: https://nip.tuik.gov.tr/?value=EgitimDurumu
• Coşkun R. Teknolojinin olanakları ile değişen sanat alanı. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 2014;6:76–89.
• Türkmenoğlu H. Teknoloji ile sanat ilişkisi ve bir dijital sanat örneği olarak Instagram. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2014;2:87–100.
• Beyoğlu A. Sanat eğitiminde altın oran ve Leonardo da Vinci’nin eserleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;13:360–82.
• Tekkanat N. The source of golden section and its reflection to art [Master’s dissertation]. Akdeniz University, Antalya; 2006:1–105.
• Odabaş O, Tekin A. Çağdaş sanat ve eğitim ilişkileri. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Dergisi 2018;3:6–12.
• Özalp K. Güzelin bilinçli algısı ve estetik eğitimi. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi 2016;5:491–504.
• Saadeh M, Shamseddine L, Hasan FK, Ayoub F. Nasal morphology in a young adult Middle-Eastern population: a stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25:199–206.
• Thomson A, Buxton LHD. Man’s nasal index in relation to certain climatic conditions. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1923;53:92–122.
• Shrestha R, Manandhar B, Upadhyay HP, Madhikarmi NL. Mean nasal index of dental students of a dental college in Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2019;57:88–91.
• Nasir N, Asad R, Muzammil K, Hassan A, Ahmed MM, Nasir S. Anthropometric study of nasal indices in four Indian states. Clinical Practice 2021;18:1620–5.
• Özdemir F, Özkoçak V. Anadolu erkeklerinde burun, yüz tipleri ve oranlarının yaşa bağlı değişimleri. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences 2017;3:135–42.
• Antai MS. Nasal anthropometry and the validity of neoclassical nasal canons in adult Ibibios. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2019;5:1007–14.
• Svitlana AS, Themozhi MS. Study of nasal index – a review. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education 2019;5:110–5.
• Leong SC, Eccles R. A systematic review of the nasal index and the significance of the shape and size of the nose in rhinology. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:191–8.
• Taskinalp O, Erden N, Yildiz Z. Some nasofacial indices in Turkish men and women. Acta Morphologica et Anthropologica 2005:167–70.
• Saygili OK, Cinar S, Gulcen B, Ozcan E, Kus I. The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2016;75:512–7.
• Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997;21:265–9.
• Prendergast P. Facial proportions. Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation: Art and Clinical Practice 2012:15–22.
• Sivkov S, Hristov I, Boukov Y, Petleshkova T, Baltadjiev A, Daskalova M, Baltadjiev G. Validity of the neoclassical facial canons in adult Bulgarians. Acta Morphologica et Anthropologica 2004;9:178–82.
• Burusapat C, Lekdaeng P. What is the most beautiful facial proportion in the 21st century? comparative study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, neoclassical Canons, and facial golden ratios. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2044.
• Kar M, Muluk N, Bafaqeeh S, Cingi C. Is it possible to define the ideal lips? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018;38:67–72.
• Mandy S. Art of the lip. Dermatol Surg 2007;33:521–2.
• Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, Gupta SC. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: a three-dimensional analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:2032–9.
• Levy B, Ariely D, Mazar N, Chi W, Lukas S, Elman I. Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty. Learn Motiv 2008;39:1–10.
• Foos PW, Clark MC. Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder. J Genet Psychol 2011;172:162–75.
• Lewandowski Z, Danel DP. Facial attractiveness and lip morphology of Caucasian women. Anthropological Review 2018;81:404–13.