360 DERECE EMPATETİK DEĞERLENDİRME METODUYLA EKİP İLİŞKİSİNİ GELİŞTİRME

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 101 - 114, 30.11.2019

Mustafa Şeref Akın

Abstract

Ekip. Ekip. Ekip. Bir işteki
belki de başarı için en önemli faktördür. Literatürde ekibin katkıları ve
şekillenmesi genişçe işlenmesine rağmen, ilişkiler boyutu az değinilmiştir. Bu
çalışmada ilişkilerin gelişmesi için uygulanacak olan 360 derece empatetik
değerlendirme metodu tanıtılacaktır. Özellikle startupların karşılaştığı büyük
kaynak kısıtlılığına karşın, en önemli öz kaynakları ekibin ahengidir. Bu
ahengin kurulması, geliştirilmesi empati ile olur. İlk aşamada içten dışa doğru
paydaşlarla ilişkisinin yoğunluğu ve kalitesi belirlenir. Karşı tarafın
kendisinden beklentisi sorularak empati yapması istenir. Bunun yanında takım
çalışanlarının değerlerini hatırlatacak, onların hassasiyetlerine yönelik
aksiyon planı uygulanacaktır. Özellikle iş yoğunluğu yüksek olan ilişkilere
yoğunlaşılır. Aksiyonun özü ilgi vermeyi dayalıdır. Bu aksiyonlar
hatırlatıcılar sayesinde rutin hale getirilecektir. Hatırlatıcılar yapılması
gerekeni otomatikleştiren unsurlardır. 
Sonuçta ekibin başarısı değer vermek, alaka göstermek, nezaket, empati
göstermek gibi insani değerlere dayalıdır

Keywords

Ekip, İlişiler, 360 Derece, Empati, Aksiyon, Hatırlatıcı, Rutin

References

• BRANNON, D. L., J.WIKLUND, J. ve HAYNIE. M. (2013). The Varying Effects of Family Relationships in Entrepreneurial Teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (1): 107–132.BRUSH, C. G. ve .MANOLOVA. T. S. (2004). Start-up problems. In Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. The Process of Business Creation, edited by W. B.Gartner, K. G.Shaver, N. M.Carter, and P. D.Reynolds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.BURT, R. S.1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge:CARROLL, G. ve HANNAN. M.(2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ:CRUZ, H., HAMILTON, CRUZ, HOWORTH, C ve HAMILTON,E. (2013). Intrafamily Entrepreneurship: The Formation and Membership of Family Entrepreneurial Teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (1), 17–46.DAVIDSSON P. ve HONIG, B. (2003). The Role of Social and Human Capital among Nascent Entrepreneurs. Journal Business Venturing, 18 (3), 301–331.DAYINLARLI, D. (2015). Risk Sermayesi ve Ekip. www.etohum.comDUHIGG, C. (2012). The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business. Random House AudioDUNN, E. ve NORTON, M. (2014). Happy Money: The Science of Happier Spending. Simon & Schuster, New York.DUNN, EL. W., LARA B. AKNIN, ve NORTON, M.I. (2014). Prosocial Spending and Happiness: Using Money to Benefit Others Pays Off. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (1), 41–47. FERN, M. CARDINAL, B ve O'NEILL, H (2012). The Genesis of Strategy in New Ventures: Escaping the Constraints of Founder and Team Knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4), 427–447.FOO, M., SIN,M ve YIONG, L. (2006). Effects of Team Inputs and Intrateam Processes of Perceptions of Team Viability and Member Satisfaction in Nascent Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 389–399.FORBES, D. P., BORCHERT, P. S., ZELLMER-BRUHN, M. E. VE SAPIENZA, H.J. (2006). Entrepreneurial Team Formation: An Exploration of New Member Addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (2): 225–248.GARTNER W., K., SHAVER, G., GATEWOOD, E ve KATZ, J. (1994). Finding Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5–9.GOLDSMITH, M., ve SILVESTER, S. (2018). Stakeholder Centered Coaching: Maximizing Your Impact as a Coach. Thinkaka, New York.GROSSMANE. B.,.YLI-RENKO, H. ve JANAKIRAMAN. R. (2012). Resource Search, Interpersonal Similarity, and Network Tie Valuation in Nascent Entrepreneurs, Emerging Networks. Journal of Management, 38 (6): 1760–1787.HARPER, D,A. (2008) Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurial Teams. Journal of Business Venturing23 (6): 613–626.LIM,J. Y., BUSENITZ ve L. W. VE CHIDAMBARAM, L. (2013). New Venture Teams and the Quality of Business Opportunities Identified: Faultlines between Subgroups of Founders and Investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (1): 47–67.LOCKYER, J. (2003). Multisource Feedback in the Assessment of Physician Competencies. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23 (1), 4-12. MCPHERSON,J.M., SMITH-LOVIN, L, ve COOK, J. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociolog, y27: 415–444.MILANOV, H. ve SHEPHERD. A. (2013). The Importance of First Relationship: The Ongoing Influence Of Initial Network On Future Status. Strategic Management Review, 34 (6): 727-750.NEWBERT, SCOTT L., TORNIKOSKI, ERNO T. VE QUIGLEY, N. (2013) Exploring the Evolution of Supporter Networks in the Creation of New Organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 99-110. PACKALEN, K. A. (2007). Complementing Capital: The Role of Status, Demographic Features, and Social Capital in Founding Teams' Abilities to Obtain Resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31 (6): 873–891.ROTEFOSS, B, ve KOLVEREID. L.. (2005). Aspiring, Nascent and Fledgling Entrepreneurs: An Investigation of the Business Start-up Process. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(2), 109–127.RUEF, M., H., ALDRICH, E. ve CARTER; N.M. (2003). The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.SHANE, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-opportunity Nexus. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. VANAELSTI., B., WRIGHT, C.A. LOCKETT, A., MORAY, N. ve S'JEGERS, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (2): 249–271.VILLANUEVA, J.,.VAN DE VEN, A.H.. ve SAPIENZA, H.J. (2012). Resources Mobilization in Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 19-30.WELLMAN, B. ve WORTLEY, S. (1990). Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.