LOKALİZE DİŞETİ ÇEKİLMESİ TEDAVİSİNDE KORONALE KAYDIRILAN FLEP VE TROMBOSİTTEN ZENGİN FİBRİN İLE KORONALE KAYDIRILAN FLEP VE SUBEPİTELYAL BAĞ DOKUSU GREFTİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: BİR OLGU SUNUMU

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 2, 228 - 232, 22.04.2018

Mustafa Özay Uslu , Serkan Dündar Abubekir Eltas

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.419007

Abstract

Bu vakanın amacı
olgumuzda maksiller kanin dişlerdeki Miller Sınıf-I dişeti çekilmelerinde
koronale kaydırılan flep (KKF) ve subepitelyal bağ dokusu grefti (SBDG)
tedavisi ile KKF ve trombositten zengin fibrin (TZF)  tedavisinin sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktı.            

Sistemik açıdan
sağlıklı 31 yaşında bayan hasta, kliniğimize dişlerinde hassasiyet ve estetik
şikayeti ile başvurdu. Maksiller sağ ve sol kanin dişinde Miller Sınıf-I dişeti
çekilmesi mevcuttu. Hastadan alınan kandan TZF elde edildi. Dişeti
çekilmelerinin tedavisi için her iki dişte önce tam kalınlık mukoperiostal flep
kaldırıldıktan sonra mukogingival birleşimden itibaren yarım kalınlık flep kaldırıldı.
Kök yüzeyi debridmanı gerçekleştirildikten sonra papil bölgesi deepitelize
edildi ve TZF interdental papile süture edildi. Sol kaninde ise SBDG papillere
süture edildi. Her iki mukoperiostal flep koronale kaydırılarak kök yüzeyi
kapatıldı. Operasyon bölgesi öjenolsüz bir pat ile korundu. Hastaya operasyon
sonrası antienflamatuvar ve klorheksidin glukonat içeren gargara reçete edildi.
Operasyon sonrası erken dönemde herhangi bir komplikasyon izlenmedi. Pat ve
süturlar operasyondan 10 gün sonra alındı. Bir ay sonra sağ kaninde %100 kök
kapanmasının sağlandığı görüldü. Sol kaninde ise 1.5 mm dişeti çekilmesi
mevcuttu ve keratinize dişeti kalınlığı TZF uygulanan dişe göre daha fazlaydı. On beş
ay sonraki dişeti çekilmesi her iki tarafta da 1 mm olarak ölçüldü.

Lokalize Miller Sınıf-I
ve sınıf-II dişeti çekilmelerinde TZF kullanılarak yapılan tedaviler hakkında
başarılı klinik sonuçlar bulunmaktadır. İkinci bir cerrahi müdahalenin
olmaması, daha az zaman alması, donör saha morbiditesinin
ortadan kalkması ve post-operatif rahatsızlığın olmaması gibi avantajlarıyla
TZF SBDG’ye
iyi bir alternatif olarak görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bağ dokusu grefti, Diş eti çekilmesi, Trombositten zengin fibrin

THE COMPARISON OF CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP WITH
PLATELET RICH FIBRIN AND CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP WITH SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE
TISSUE GRAFT IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED GINGIVAL RECESSION: A CASE REPORT

ABSTRACT

The
purpose of this case was comparing the efficacy of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) treatment and CAF with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the maxillary canine teeth with Miller Class-I gingival recessions.

Systemically
healthy 31 year-old female patient was admitted to our
clinic with
a complaint of aesthetic and hypersensitivity.
Miller Class-I gingival recession was present in maxillary right and left canine teeth. PRF was obtained from the patient’s
blood. Full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected followed by a partial thickness flap
beyond the mucogingival junction for
the treatment of gingival recessions at both tooth. The
papilla area was deepitelized after root surface debridement and
PRF was sutured to the interdental
papilla. SCTG was sutured to papilla at left canine. Root surface was closed by sliding the both mucoperiosteal flaps coronally.
The surgical area was protected using a non-eugenol dres- sing. After surgery anti-inflammatory and chlorhexidine
gluconate mouthwash was prescribed. There were no complications in the early period after
the operation.
The dressing and sutures were removed 10 days after the operation. 100% root coverage was maintained at right canine one month later. There was 1.5 mm gingival re- cession at left canine and keratinized gingival thickness was higher according
to the PRF applied teeth. The gingi- val recession was 1 mm at both sides fifteen month later.

There
are successful clinical results​​ in the
treatment of localized Miller Class-I and
Class-II gingival recessions using PRF. PRF is seen as a good
alternative to SCTG with advantages such as the absence of a
second surgical intervention, less time consuming, the elimination of donor site morbidity and the lack of post-operative
discomfort.

Keywords: Connective tissue graft, Gingival recession, Platelet rich fibrin

Keywords

Bağ dokusu grefti, Diş eti çekilmesi

References

• 1. Smith RG. Gingival recession. Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:201-5.
• 2. Eltas A, Toy VE. Malatya Bölgesinde Dişeti Çekil- mesinin Yaygınlığının, Şiddetinin ve Etkenlerinin Araştırılması. İnonu Univ Saglık Bilimleri Derg 2013;1:29-33.
• 3. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220-5.
• 4. Nizam N, Akcalı A. Dişeti çekilmelerinin tedavisinde mikrocerrahi: Literatür Derlemesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2011;24:283-90
• 5. Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV, Haugejorden O, Albandar JM. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 2004;75:1377-86.
• 6. Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: prevalence, severity, and extent of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992;63:489-95.
• 7. Kundapur PP, Bhat KM, Bhat GS. Association of trauma from occlusion with localized gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth. Dent Res J 2009;6:71-4.
• 8. Khocht A, Spindel L, Person P. A comparative clinical study of the safety and efficacy of three tooth brushes. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 603-10.
• 9. Sullivan HC. Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession. Periodontics 1968;6:152-60.
• 10. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5:8-13.
• 11. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJ, Mouhyi J, Gogly B. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:37-44.
• 12. Pini Prato GP, Baldi C, Nieri M, Franseschi D, Cortellini P, Clauser C, Rotundo R, Muzzi L.Coronally advanced flap: the post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage. J Periodontol 2005;76:713-22.
• 13. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-20.
• 14. Oates TW, Robinson M, Gunsolley JC. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:303-20.
• 15. Hofmanner P, Alessandri R, Laugisch O, Aroca S, Salvi GE, Stavropoulos A, Sculean A. Predictability of surgical techniques used for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recessions--A systematic review. Quintessence Int 2012 43:545-54.
• 16. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Barbieri B, Gera I, Etienne D. Clinical evaluation of a modified coronally advanced flap alone or in combination with a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a 6-month study. J Periodontol 2009;80:244-52.
• 17. Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Klokkevold P, Lekovic V, Dimitrijevic B, Kenney EB, Camargo P. Use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane following treatment of gingival recession: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;32:41-50.
• 18. Padma R, Shilpa A, Kumar PA, Nagasri M, Kumar C, Sreedhar A. A split mouth randomized controlled study to evaluate the adjunctive effect of platelet-rich fibrin to coronally advanced flap in Miller's class-I and II recession defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:631-6.
• 19. Carvalho PF, da Silva RC, Cury PR, Joly JC. Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions. J Periodontol 2006;77:1901-6.
• 20. Chambrone LA, Chambrone L. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. J Periodontol 2006;77:909-16.
• 21. Pini-Prato GP, Cairo F, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Rotundo R, Cortellini P. Coronally advanced flap versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth study with a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:644-50.
• 22. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 2010;81:452-78.