PUBERTAL BÜYÜME ATILIMI EVRELERİNİN BELİRLENMESİNDE SERVİKAL VERTEBRA MATURASYONLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 457 - 461, 14.10.2018

Mehmet Uğurlu , İsmail Ceylan

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473692

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, lateral sefalometrik rad-
yografiler üzerinden belirlenen servikal vertebraların maturasyonel safhaları
ile bireylerin kronolojik yaşları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza kronolojik yaşları 9-16
aralığında olan 45 kız ve 45 erkek toplam 90 sağlıklı birey dahil edilmiştir.
Lateral sefalometrik radyogra- filerin alındığı gün esas alınarak bireylerin ay
cinsinden yaşları hesaplanmıştır. Lateral sefalometrik radyogra- filerde
servikal vertebral büyüme atılımının değerlendi- rilmesinde Hassel-Farman
yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizleri SPSS
20.0 prog- ramı ile Spearman Rank Korelasyon Analizi, Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi
kullanılarak yapılmıştır.

Bulgular: Bireylerin
Hassel-Farman yöntemi ile belir- lenen pubertal büyüme atılımı evreleri ile ay
cinsinden kronolojik yaşları arasındaki ilişki değerlendirilmiş ve kız bireyler
açısından bu değer (ρ=0,661) “orta dere- celi korelasyon” gösterirken erkek
bireyler açısından ise bu değer (ρ=0,559) yine “orta dereceli korelasyon”
göstermiştir.

Sonuç: Servikal vertebraların maturasyonel aşama- larının
değerlendirilmesi ile belirlenen pubertal atılım evreleri ile kronolojik yaş
arasında hem kızlarda hem de erkeklerde orta derecede korelasyon olduğu belir- lenmiş
ve sonuç olarak bu metodun ortodontik açıdan iskeletsel maturasyonun
değerlendirilmesinde el-bilek radyografisi elde edilemeyen durumlarda
alternatif bir metot olabileceği düşünülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Pubertal
büyüme atılımı, kronolojik yaş, servikal vertebra, Grave-Brown ve Hassel-Farman
yöntemleri

ASSESSMENT OF
CERVICAL VERTEBRA MATURATION IN THE DETERMINATION OF PUBERTAL GROWTH SPURT
PHASES

ABSTRACT

Aim:  The aim of
this study is to examine the relationship between the maturational phases of
cervical vertebrae determined by lateral cephalometric radiographs and
chronological ages of the individuals.

Materials
and Methods: This study comprised a
total of 90 healthy individuals, 45 girls and 45 boys, with chronological ages
ranging between 9-16. The age of the each individual were calculated in months
at the time when the lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken. The
Hassel-Farman method was used for the evaluation of pubertal growth spurt
utlizing cervical vertebrae images in lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Statistical analyzes of the data were performed using Spearman rank correlation
analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with SPSS 20.0 program.

Results: The relation between the phases of the pubertal growth
spurt in the individuals determined by Hassel-Farman method and their
chronological ages by months is evaluated and it was found that they were moderately
correlated in both females and males with the value of (p=0,661) and (p=0,559)
consecutively.

Conclusion: It has been determined that there is a moderate
correlation between chronological age and the developmental growth stages
determined cervical vertebrae maturation both in females and males. Therefore
this method may considered to be a suitable method that can be used in the
identification and evulation of the growth and developmental stage in terms of
orthodontics.

* Serbest Diş Hekimi ** Atatürk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti AD, Erzurum

Keywords:
Pubertal growth spurt, chronological age, cervical
vertebra, Grave-Brown and Hassel-Farman methods

Keywords

Pubertal büyüme atılımı, kronolojik yaş, servikal vertebra

References

• 1. Singer J. Physiologic timing of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1980; 50: 322-33.
• 2. Grave KC. Timing of facial growth: a study of relations with stature and ossification in the hand around puberty. Aust Orthod J 1973; 3: 117.
• 3. Chapman SM. Ossification of the adductor sesamoid and the adolescent growth spurt. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 236-44.
• 4. Demirjian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Patterson DK. Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 433-8.
• 5. Grave KC, Brown T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Orthod 1976; 69: 611-9.
• 6. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 458-9.
• 7. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 58-66.
• 8. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Seminars in Orthodontics Elsevier 2005; 11: 119-29.
• 9. Hunter CJ. The Correlation Of Facial Growth With Body Height And Skeletal Maturation At Adolescence. Angle Orthod 1966; 36: 44-54.
• 10. Johnston FE, Paul Hufham Jr H, Moreschi AF, Terry GP. Skeletal Maturation And Cephalofacial Development 1. Angle Orthod 1965; 35: 1-11.
• 11. Ülgen M. Ortodonti Anomaliler, Sefalometri, Etiyo- loji, Büyüme ve Gelişim, Tanı 1. Basım. İstanbul: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayınları; 2000. s. 315-47.
• 12. Abbassi V. Growth and normal puberty. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 507-11.
• 13. Rübendüz M, Kanık A. 10-15 yaş arası kız ve erkek çocuklarda retardasyon, ortalama gelişim ve gelişim ileriliğinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Turkish J Orthod 1997; 10: 31-7.
• 14. Sassouni V. Dentofacial orthopedics: a critical review. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 255-69.
• 15. Bishara SE, Peterson LC, Bishara EC. Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 238-52.
• 16. WR P. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5 th ed. 2013.
• 17. Grave KC, Brown T. Carpal radiographs in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 27-45.
• 18. Roth RH, Graber TM, Swaın BF. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Louis CV Mosby Co 1985; 678.
• 19. Gülyurt M. Ortodonti Yönünden Büyüme ve Gelişim. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları, 1.Baskı, 1989.
• 20. Leite HR, O’Reilly MT, Close JM. Skeletal age assessment using the first, second, and third fingers of the hand. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92: 492-8.
• 21. Pyle I, Sontag LW. Variability in onset of ossification in epiphyses and short bones of the extremities. Am J Roentgenol 1943; 49: 795-8.
• 22. Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H. Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 122: 380-5.
• 23. San Roman P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E. Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 303-11.
• 24. García-Fernandez P, Torre H, Flores L, Rea J. The cervical vertebrae as maturational indicators. J Clin Orthod 1998; 32: 221-5.
• 25. Rajagopal R, Kansal S. A comparison of modified MP3 stages and the cervical vertebrae as growth indicators. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 398.
• 26. Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 984-9.
• 27. Ceylan İ, Erdem A, Gülyurt M. Servikal vertebraların olgunlaşma safhaları ile pubertal büyüme atılım safhaları ve kemik yaşı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1995; 2: 111-6
• 28. Kucukkeles N, Acar A, Biren S, Arun T. Comparisons between cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation for the assessment of skeletal maturity. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 24: 47-52.
• 29. Flores-Mir C, Burgess CA, Champney M, Jensen RJ, Pitcher MR, Major PW. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 1-5.
• 30. Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H. Predicting mandibular growth potential with cervical vertebral bone age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 124: 173-7.
• 31. Kama JD, Aslan SGD, Darı O, Özer T. Erkek Bireylerde Servikal Vertebra Kemik Yaşının Kronolojik ve İskelet Yaş ile Karşılaştırılması. Dicle Tıp Derg 2006; 33: 36-41.
• 32. Özer T, Kama JD, Özer SY A practical method for determining pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130: 131-e1.
• 33. Grave K, Townsend G. Cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt. Aust Orthod J 2003; 19: 25.
• 34. Chang HP, Liao CH, Yang YH, Chang HF, Chen KC. Correlation of cervical vertebra maturation with hand-wrist maturation in children. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2001; 17: 29-35.
• 35. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 118: 335-40.
• 36. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 316-23.
• 37. Wong RWK, Alkhal HA, Rabie ABM. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 136: 484-e1.
• 38. Sierra AM. Assessment of dental and skeletal maturity: a new approach. Angle Orthod 1987; 57, 194-208.
• 39. Baidas L. Correlation between cervical vertebrae morphology and chronological age in Saudi adolescents. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci 2012; 3: 21-6.
• 40. Alkhal HA, Wong RWK, Rabie ABM. Correlation bet- ween chronological age, cervical vertebral matu- ration and Fishman’s skeletal maturity indicators in southern Chinese. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 591-6.