A New Model Trial in Turkish Agri-Food Sector

Year 2024, , 157 - 172, 29.04.2024

Coşkun Şerefoğlu

https://doi.org/10.33688/aucbd.1403900

Abstract

The study aims to develop an agri-food model for the agriculture sector which was prioritized in Ankara Regional Innovation Strategy. The model was designed by Ankara Development Agency and implemented at the pilot level. The model consisted of two components. One of them is technology absorption, which matches technology makers and farmers or companies in order to bring technology to this sector, and another one is an extension model that university, research stations, farmers, and food companies work together to spread innovation. This model will shed light on a different approach in developing countries thanks to technological improvement and the great interest of startups and public policies for the agro-food sector. The pilot model was based on ten matches in between farmers, food firms, and universities. The preliminary results showed that the program was welcomed by farmers and food companies as well as start-ups.

Keywords

Regional Innovation, Ankara, Agriculture, Food, Technology, Agricultural Extension

Türk tarım-gıda sektöründe yeni bir model denemesi

Abstract

Çalışma, Ankara Bölgesel Yenilik Stratejisinde öncelikli olan tarım sektörü için bir tarım-gıda modelinin geliştirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Model Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı tarafından tasarlanmış ve pilot düzeyde uygulanmıştır. Model iki bileşenden oluşmuştur. Bunlardan biri, teknolojiyi bu sektöre getirmek için teknoloji geliştiriciler ile çiftçileri veya şirketleri eşleştiren teknoloji özümseme modeli, diğeri ise üniversite, araştırma istasyonları ve çiftçiler ile gıda şirketlerinin yeniliği yaymak için birlikte çalıştığı yayım modelidir. Bu model, teknolojik gelişmeler ve start-upların ve kamu politikalarının tarım-gıda sektörüne olan yoğun ilgisi sayesinde gelişmekte olan ülkelerde farklı bir yaklaşıma ışık tutacaktır. Pilot model çiftçiler, gıda firmaları ve üniversiteler arasındaki on karşılaşmaya dayanmaktadır. Ön sonuçlar, programın çiftçiler ve gıda şirketlerinin yanı sıra yeni kurulan şirketler tarafından da memnuniyetle karşılandığını göstermiştir.

Keywords

Bölgesel inovasyon, Ankara, Tarım, Gıda, Teknoloji, Tarımsal Yayım

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı bünyesinde yürütülmüştür.

References

• Akkoyunlu, Ş. (2013). Agricultural innovations in Turkey. Swiss National Science Foundation. Working Paper, No 30.
• Aman, G. R. (2014). Success and failure among agricultural cooperatives in Turkey. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1794/17991
• Barca, F. (2008). An Agenda for A Reformed Cohesion Policy A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
• Castillo, J.D., Barroeta, B., Paton, J. (2011). Converting Smart Specialisation into A Regional Strategy.
• Cavicchi, A., Ciampi Stancova, K. (2016). Food and gastronomy as elements of regional innovation strategies. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Spain.
• Coehorn, C.A. (1995). The Dutch Innovation Centres: Implementation of Technology Policy or Facilitating Small Enterprises? dissertation RUG, Groningen.
• Cooke, P. (1996). The new wave of regional innovation networks: Analysis, characteristics and strategy. Small Business Economics, 8, 159-171. doi: 10.1007/BF00394424
• Dargan, L., Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x
• Diederen, P., Van Meijl, H., Wolters, A. (1999). Innovation in agriculture: Innovators, early adoptors and laggards. In 3rd International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation. Austin, Texas, USA.
• Diederen P., Meijl, H.V., Wolters, A., Bijak, K. (2003). Innovation adoption in agriculture: Innovators, early adopters and laggards. Cahiers d’Economie et de Sociologie Rurales, INRA Editions, 67, 29-50. doi: 10.3406/reae.2003.1714
• Dosi, G. (1988). Procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature. 26(3), 120-171.
• EC (2020). Agro-food and related priorities, smart spesialisation platform. Access date: 18.12.2020. Retrieved from https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/agri-food
• Erdil, E., Çetin, D. (2018). Türkiye Bölgeleri ve Akıllı Uzmanlaşma. Access date: 09.12.2020. Retrieved from http://tekpol.org/turkiye-bolgeleri-ve-akilli-uzmanlasma-erkan-erdil-dilek-cetin/
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Eldarrain, X.G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide on research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3 Guide), European Commission.
• InnovateUK. (2017). InnovateUK, Access date: 21.12.2020. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/funding-competition-agri-food-innovation-in-turkey/agri-food-innovation-in-turkey-competition-brief
• Kelsey, L., Hearne, C.C. (1952). Cooperative Extension Work, Comstock Publishing Company, Inc. U.S.A.
• Landabaso, M., Mouton, B. (2005). Towards A Different Regional İnnovation Policy: Eight Years of European Experience Through. The European Regional Development Fund Innovative Actions.
• McCann, P., Ortega-Argiles, R. (2011). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. Economic Geography Working Paper 2011, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen.
• Minh, T.T., Neef, A., Hoffmann, V. (2011). Agricultural knowledge transfer and innovation processes in Vietnam’s Northwestern Uplands: State-governed or demand-driven? Southeast Asian Studies. 48(4), 425-455. doi: 10.20495/tak.48.4_425
• Nieuwenhuis, L.F.M. (2002). Innovation and learning in agriculture, Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(6), 283-291. doi:10.1108/03090590210431256
• OECD. (2011). OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation: Regions and Innovation Policy, Paris.
• Pavan, M. Anelli, M.G. (2015). H-Farm: The innovation hub, SYMPHONYA Emerging Issues in Management, 3, 55-59. doi: 10.4468/2015.3.08pavan.anelli
• Pires, A.R., Pertoldi, M., Edwards, J., Hegyi, F.B. (2014). Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas, S3 Policy Brief Series, European Commission.
• RIS3 Guide (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Brussels. 1-57(59). Retrieved from 2012.3722_RIS3_GUIDE.pdf (uc.pt)
• Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of Technology, The Free Press A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc, U.S.
• Rubin, T.H., Aas, T.H., Stead, A. (2015). Knowledge flow in technological business incubators: evidence from Australia and Israel, Technovation, 41-42, 11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.002
• Serefoglu, C., Doğrukök, E., Gökkaya, E., Yaşın, Z. (2017). Ankara Rural Innovation Road Map (2017-2023). Ankara Development Agency, Ankara.
• Serefoglu, C., Öztürk, E., Şiltu, H., Yaman, M.N., Gülbay, N., Akbulut, Z.T.Ş. (2019). Ankara Regional Innovation Strategy. Ankara
• Spielman, D.J., Birner, R. (2008). How Innovative Is Your Agriculture? Using Innovation Indicators and Benchmarks to Strenghten National Agricultural Innovation Systems, Agriculture and Rural Development, Discussion Paper:41, The World Bank.
• Sunding, D., Zilberman, D. (1999). The Agricultural Innovation Process: Research and Technology Adoption in a Changing Agricultural Sector. For the Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, U.S.
• TTGV. (2021). Tarım Ekosisteminde İnovasyon Fırsatları. Yeşil Kitap, Tartışma Belgesi, Ankara.
• Tümen, S., Özerten, G. (2020). Katma Değerin Artırılması, İnovasyon ve Dijital Tarım, TÜSİAD. TÜSİAD-T/2020-03/615
• Vitalis, V. (2007). Trade, Innovation and Growth: The Case of the New Zealand Agriculture Sector, a paper presented to the OECD Global Trade Forum on Trade, Innovation and Growth 14-15 October, 2007, OECD, Paris.
• Wang, S.L. (2014). Cooperative extension system: Trends and economic impacts on U.S. agriculture, Choices, 29(1), 1-8. doi: 10.2307/choices.29.1.15