İkinci konut sahipliliğinde motivasyon, sosyo-demografik özellikler ve seyahat karakteristikleri arasındaki ilişkiler: Yalova-Çınarcık örneği

Year 2016, , 39 - 56, 01.04.2016

Ayşe Okuyucu , Mehmet Somuncu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000172

Cited By: 2

Abstract

İkinci konutlar turizm ve rekreasyonel amaçlarla doğrudan ilişkili olduğu için, çoğu zaman boş zaman endüstrisinin bir parçası olarak dikkate alınmaktadırlar. Ancak ikinci konut sahipliliğindeki motivasyon kaynakları ve destinasyon seçimi altında yatan nedenlerle ilgili kısıtlı bir literatür vardır. Çınarcık ilçesi Türkiye’de 1960’lardan itibaren ikinci konut destinasyonu olarak gelişme göstermiş bir yerdir. Fakat Çınarcık’ta destinasyonun gelişme ve tercih edilme nedenleri ile ilgili herhangi bir araştırma yapılmamıştır. Bundan hareketle bu çalışmada, Çınarcık’ta ikinci konut sahiplerinin, ikinci konut edinme ve seyahat motivasyonu altında yatan boyutları tanımlamak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 370 ikinci konut sahibine anket uygulanmıştır. Faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre, Çınarcık’tan ikinci konut satın almada deniz-iklim ve doğa kaynaklı çekicilikler, rekreasyonel çekicilikler, aile ve kişisel nedenler ve ekonomik nedenler olmak üzere dört faktör etkili olmaktadır. Sosyodemografik özellikler, seyahat karakteristikleri ve motivasyon faktörleri arasındaki farklılıklar t testi ve ANOVA testi kullanılarak tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlarına göre; medeni durum, seyahat mesafesi ve ikinci konutlarda tatil yapan kişi sayısı gibi değişkenler ile çeşitli motivasyon faktörleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklar bulunmuştur

Keywords

İkinci konutlar, motivasyon, seyahat motivasyonu, Çınarcık, Yalova

The relationship between motivation, socio-demographic and travelling characteristics of second home ownership: the case of Yalova-Çınarcık

Abstract

Due to the fact that the second homes is directly related to tourism and recreational purposes, they are often considered as part of the leisure industry. But there is limited literature related to motivation in second home ownership and the reasons behind the choice of destination. Çınarcık district is a place in Turkey where has developed a second home destination from the 1960s. But there is not any research with regard to reason why Çınarcık has developed and preferred as a destination. From this point of view, in this study is aimed to determine underlying dimensions about acquiring second homes and travel motivation of second home owners in Çınarcık. In the study 370 surveys were applied to the second home owners. According to the results of the factor analysis, the purchase of second homes in Çınarcık, four factors are effective. These are comprises; sea-climate and naturebased attractiveness, recreational attractiveness, family and personal reasons and economic reasons. The differences between socio-demographic characteristics, travelling characteristics and motivational factors are identified using t-test and ANOVA. According to the obtained results; statistically significant differences is found variables such as marital status, travel distance, the number of people who vacation in second homes and various motivational factors

Keywords

Second homes, motivation, travel motivation, Çınarcık, Yalova

References

• Araonsson, L. (2004) “Place attachment of vacation resident: between tourists and permanenet residents”, In Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (eds), Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 75-86.
• Armstrong, A.; Stedman, R.C. (2013) “Culture clash and second home ownership in the U.S. Northern Forest”. Rural Sociology, 78 (3), 318–345.
• Baloğlu, S. (1997) “The relationship between destination images and sociodemographic and trip characteristics of international travellers”, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 3(3), 221-233.
• Barke, M. (2007) “Second homes in Spain: an analysis of change at the provincial level, 1981–2001”, Geography, 92(3), 195-207.
• Caber, M.; Albayrak, T. (2016) “Push or pull? Identifying rock climbing tourists motivations”, Tourism Management, 55, 74- 84.
• Casado-Diaz, M. A. (1999) “ Socio-demographic impacts of residential tourism: a case study of Torrevieja, Spain”, International Journal of Tourism Research, 1, 223-237.
• Chaplin, D. (1999) “Consuming work/productive leisure: the consumption patterns of second home environments”, Leisure Studies, 18(1), 41-55.
• Clout, H.D. (1969) “Second homes in France”, Journal of the Town Planning Institute, 55, 440-443.
• Clout, H. D. (1972) “Second homes in the United States”, Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 63(6), 393- 401.
• Cohen, E. (1974) “Who is a tourist? A conceptual clarification”, The Sociological Review, 22(4), 527-555.
• Coppock, J.T. (1977) Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Pergamon, Oxford.
• Crompton, J. L. (1979) “Motivations for pleasure vacation”, Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424.
• Çınarcık Life (2015), Erişim: 03 Ocak 2016, http://www.cinarciklife.com/cinarcik/
• Dann, G. M. (1977) “Anomie, ego-enhancement and tourism”. Annals of tourism research, 4(4), 184-194.
• Dijst, M.; Lanzendorf, M.; Barendregt, A.; Smit, L. (2005) “Second homes in Germany and the Netherlands: ownership and travel impact explained”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(2), 139-152.
• Emekli, G. (2014) “İkinci konut kavramı açısından turizm coğrafyasının önemi ve Türkiye’de ikinci konutların gelişimi”, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 23(1), 25-42.
• Flognfeldt, T. (2002) “Second-home ownership: a sustainable semi-migration” In Hall, C.M., Williams, A.M. (eds.), Tourism and migration new relationships between production and consumption, Springer, Montreal, 187-204.
• Gallent, N.; Mace, A.; Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005) Second homes: European perspectives and UK policies. Ashgate.
• Girard, T.C.; Gartner, W. C. (1993) “Second home second view host community perception”, Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 685-700.
• Gökdeniz, A. (2014) Ev turizmi Ayvalık ve Danimarka Navasol Örnekleri, , 1. Baskı, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Gürbüz, S.; Şahin, F. (2015) Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri felsefe-yöntem-analiz, 2. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Hall, C. M.; Müller, D. K.; Saarinen, J. (2009) Nordic tourism: Issues and cases, Channel View Publications: Bristol.
• Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (2004) “Introduction to second homes, curse or blessing? Revisited” In Hall, C.M., Müller, D.K. (eds.), Tourism, mobility and second homes between elite landscape and common ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 3-14.
• Hall, M.; Page, S.J. (2006) The geography of tourism and recreation Environment, Place and Space, 3rd Edition, Routledge, London and New York.
• Heung, V. C.; Qu, H.; Chu, R. (2001) “The relationship between vacation factors and socio-demographic and travelling characteristics: The case of Japanese leisure travellers”, Tourism Management, 22(3), 259-269.
• Hiltunen, M.; Rehunen, A. (2014) “Second home mobility in Finland: patterns, practices and relations of leisure oriented mobile lifestyle”, Fennia, 192, 1-22.
• Hoggart, K.; Buller, H. (1995) “Geographical differences in British property acquisitions in rural France”, Geographical Journal, 161(1), 69-78.
• Hoogendoorn, G. (2010) Second homes and local economic impacts in the South African post-productivist countryside, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Free State, Faculty of Humanities, Bloemfontein.
• Jaakson, R. (1986) “Second-home domestic tourism”, Annals of Tourism Research, 13, 367-391.
• Jansson, B.; Müller, D. K. (2004) “Second home plans among second home owners in Northern Europe’s periphery”, In Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (eds), Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 261-272.
• Jönsson, C.; Devonish, D. (2008) “Does nationality, gender, and age affect travel motivation? A case of visitors to the Caribbean island of Barbados”, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(3-4), 398-408.
• Kaltenborn, B. P.; Clout, H. D. (1998) “The alternate home-motives of recreation home use.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift- Norwegian Journal of Geography, 52(3),121-134.
• Kauppila, P. (2010) “Resorts, second home owners and distance: A case study in northern Finland”, Fennia, 188(2), 163-178.
• Kozak, M. (2002) “Comparative analysis of tourist motivations by nationality and destinations”, Tourism management, 23(3), 221-232.
• Lemmen, A. (2011) Second home development in South Africa. Utrecht University, Unpublished Master Thesis, Utrecht.
• Lipkina, O. (2013). “Motives for Russian second home ownership in Finland”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 13(4), 299-316.
• Müller, D.K. (1999) German second home owners in the Swedish countryside: On the internationalization of the leisure space, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Umeå University, Department of Social and Economic Geography,Umeå.
• Müller, D. K. (2002) “Reinventing the countryside: German second-home owners in Southern Sweden”, Current Issues in Tourism, 5(5), 426-446.
• Müller, D.K. (2007) “Second homes in the Nordic Countries: between common heritage and exclusive commodity”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), 193-201.
• Müller, D. K. (2011a) “The internationalization of rural municipalities: Norwegian second home owners in Northern Bohuslän, Sweden”, Tourism Planning & Development, 8(4), 433-445.
• Müller, D. K. (2011b) “Second homes in rural areas: reflections on a troubled history”, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift- Norwegian Journal of Geography, 65(3), 137-143.
• Norris, M.; Winston, N. (2010) “Second-home owners: escaping, investing or retiring?”, Tourism Geographies: An
• International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 12(4), 546-567.
• Nouza, M.; Ólafsdóttir, R.; Müller, D.K. (2013) “A new approach to spatial-temporal development of second homes: case study from Iceland”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 13(1), 20-37.
• NVI (2016), Erişim: 10 Mayıs 2016, http://www.nvi.gov.tr/NVI.html
• Özgüç, N. (1977) “Tatil evleri”, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Şehircilik Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 69-92.
• Pienaar, J. J.; Visser, G. (2009) “The thorny issue of identifying second homes in South Africa”, Urban Forum, 20, 455–469.
• Pitkänen, K.; Adamiak, C.; Halseth, G. (2013) “Leisure activities and rural community change: valuation and use of rural space among permanent residents and second home owners”, Sociologia Ruralis, 54(2), 143-166.
• Pitkänen, K.; Vepsäläinen, M. (2008) “Foreseeing the future of second home tourism. the case of Finnish media and policy discourse”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(19), 1-24.
• Plog, S. (1974) “Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 14(4): 55-8.
• Quinn, B. (2004) “Dwelling through multiple places: a case study of second home ownership in Ireland”, In Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (eds), Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 113-132.
• Roca, O.; Oliverira, J.; Roca, Z.; Costa, L. (2012) “Second home tourism in the Oeste Region, Portugal: features and impacts”, European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 3(2), 35 55.
• Ross, E. L. D.; Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1991) “Sightseeing tourists' motivation and satisfaction”, Annals of Tourism Research, 18(2), 226-237.
• Ryan, C. (1991). Recreational tourism: A social science perspective, Routledge,Clevedon.
• Rye, J. F. (2011) “Conflicts and contestations. rural populations’ perspectives on the second homes phenomenon”, Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 263-274.
• Salazar, N. B.; Zhang, Y. (2013) “Seasonal lifestyle tourism: the case of Chinese elites”, Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 81- 99.
• Sievänen, T., Pouta, E.; Neuvonen, M. (2007) “Recreational home users-potential clients for countryside tourism?”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), 223-242.
• Somuncu, M.; Akpınar, N.; Kurum, E.; Çubuk Kaya, N.; Özelçi Eceral T. (2010) “Gümüşhane ili yaylalarındaki arazi kullanımı ve işlev değişiminin değerlendirilmesi: Kazıkbeli ve Alistire yaylaları örneği”, Ankara Üniversitesi Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 107-127.
• Timothy, D. J. (2004) “Recreastional second homes in the United States: developmet ıssues and contemporary patterns”, In Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (eds), Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 133-148.
• Tjİrve, E., Flognfeldt, T.; Tjİrve, K.M.C. (2013) “The effects of distance and belonging on second-home markets”, Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 15(2), 268-291.
• Turizm Bakanlığı (1990) İkinci konut envanteri, 1989 (Rapor No: 1990/3), Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırımlar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• TÜİK (2014), Erişim: 17 Aralık 2015, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks.zul
• Vuuren, V.; Slabbert, E. (2012) “Travel motivations and behaviour of tourists to a south african resort”, Tourism & Management Studies, 295-304.
• Wang, X. (2006). The second home phenomenon in Haikou China. University of Waterloo Unpublished Master Thesis, Canada.
• Williams, S. (1998). Tourism Geography. Routledge, London and New York.