Tevbe Sûresine Göre Tebük Seferi Sırasında Münafıkların Davranışlarının Tipolojisi

Year 2024, Volume: 65 Issue: 1, 121 - 148, 31.05.2024

Fereshteh Motamad Langrodi , Fathiyeh Fattahizade

https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.1287330

Abstract

Hz. Muhammed'in hayatının son yıllarındaki önemli olaylardan biri Tebük Seferi'ydi. Bu, Kur'an-ı Kerim'e ve tarihi metinlere, onun özel koşullarını da içerecek şekilde yansımıştır. Tebük Seferi'nde münafıkların davranış ve eylemleri, sahabelerin fedakârlıklarına ve ısrarlarına ters düşüyordu. Bu duruma karşılık olarak Tevbe Suresi'nin ayetleri münafıkların niyetlerini ortaya koyarak, işbirliği yapmamalarının gerçek nedenlerini dile getirmektedir. Bu grubun dini toplum üzerindeki etkisi dikkate alındığında münafıkların davranış ve niyetlerinin aydınlatılması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, Tebük seferi sırasında münafıkların davranışlarının tipolojisini Tevbe ayetlerinden hareketle niteliksel ve niceliksel yöntemler kullanarak ortaya koymakta ve bu davranışların nedenlerini analiz etmektedir. Münafıkların eylemlerini konu alan 39 ayetin istatistiki incelemesi sonucunda, bu eylemlerin yüzde 84'ünün sosyo-politik ve dini, yüzde 16'sının ise ekonomik olduğu ortaya çıktı. Tevbe ayetlerinin özellikle sahabelerin Tebük seferindeki davranışlarına odaklanılması ve askeri hedeflerin göz ardı edilmesi, Tebük seferinin asıl amacını aydınlatmaktadır. Bu Sefer askeri amaçlar gütmüyordu; daha doğrusu bu, Peygamber'in sahabelerinin niyetlerini ortaya çıkarmak için Müslümanların bir imtihanıydı. Münafıkların davranışlarındaki çeşitliliğin, dini değerlere yönelik tutumlarından ve İslam toplumunun değerleriyle fikir ve amaçları arasındaki çatışmadan kaynaklandığı görülmektedir.

Keywords

Hz. Muhammed, Tevbe Suresi, Tebük Seferi, Tipoloji, Münafıklar, Sahabeler, Tutum.

Typology of Hypocrites’ Behaviors during the Expedition of Tabūk based on Sūrah al-Tawba

Abstract

A significant event in the final years of the life of the Prophet Muḥammad was the Expedition of Tabūk. This has been reflected in the Holy Quran and historical texts by including its particular circumstances. In the Expedition of Tabūk, the behaviors and actions of the hypocrites ran counter to the sacrifices and persistence of Prophet’s companions. In response to this situation, the Quranic verses of Sūrah al-Tawba reveal the hypocrites’ intentions, expressing the actual reasons for their lack of cooperation. Given the influence of this group of people on the religious community, it is necessary to elucidate the behaviors and intentions of the hypocrites. This study presents the typology of hypocrites’ behaviors during the Expedition of Tabūk based on the verses of al-Tawba by using qualitative and quantitative methods, and analyzes the causes of these behaviors. The statistical reviews of 39 verses dealing with the hypocrites’ actions revealed that 84% of these actions were sociopolitical and religious, while the remaining 16% were economic. The particular focus of the verses of al-Tawba on the behavior of the companions of the Prophet in the Expedition of Tabūk and disregarding its military objectives elucidates the main goal of the Expedition of Tabūk. This Expedition did not pursue military goals; rather, it was a test of Muslims to reveal the intentions of the companions of the Prophet. It seems that the diversity in the hypocrites’ behaviors is rooted in their attitudes towards religious values and the conflict between the values of the Islamic society with their ideas and purposes.

Keywords

The Prophet Muḥammad, al-Tawba, Expedition of Tabūk, Hypocrites, Companions, Attitude.

Supporting Institution

Alzahra University

References

• Azarbaijanī, Massoud et al. Social Psychology with an Aattitude towards Islamic Sources. Tehran: Samt Publications, 2003.
• al-Balādhurī, Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā b. Jābir. Ansāb al-Ashrāf. Ed. Suhayl Zakkār and Riyadh Zerekl. 3 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1996.
• Akhondī, Muhammad Baqer, “The Typology of Hypocrisy in the Noble Qur’an (Sociological Examination of Hypocrisy Phenomenon)”, Āmūzah/hā-yi Qurʾānī 11:20 (2015): 53-76.
• Bakhtiari, Shahla and Fatemeh Motahary Far. “The Typology of Companions’ Contribution in Auhud Battle Based on The Qur’an and Historical Resources.” History of Islam and Iran” 25: 26 (2015): 5-28.
• Barden, J., Rucker, D. D. and Richard E. Petty. “Saying One Thing and Doing Another: Examining the Impact of Event Order on Hypocrisy Judgments of Others.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31:11 (2005): 1463-1474.
• Barta, Sergio, Raquel Gurrea and Carlos Flavián. “Using Augmented Reality to Reduce Cognitive Dissonance and Increase Purchase Intention.” Computers in Human Behavior 140 (2023): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107564.
• Brunell, Amy B., Sara Staats, Jamie Barden and Julie M. Hupp. “Narcissism and Academic Dishonesty: The Exhibitionism Dimension and the Lack of Guilt.” Personality and Individual Differences. 2011, 20:3 (2011): 323-328.
• Erwin, Philip. Attitudes and Persuasion. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
• Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Ebū ʿAbdillāh Muḥammad b. ʿUmar. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. 2 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Iāyā al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1999.
• Fakhraee, Soosan, Alimohamad Valavi and Fatemeh Jamila Kohne Shahri. “Typology of Elites in Historical Researches (Case: Typology and Explaining Political Orientation of Shia Imamye Elites in the Abbasid Era).” Methodology of Religious Studies 1:1 (2014): 46-74.
• Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. California: Stanford University Press, 1957.
• Grothers, Charles‬. Merton’s Sociology. Trans. Zohra Kesai, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaī University, 1999.
• Harmon-Jones, Eddie, David M. Amodio and Cindy Harmon-Jones. “Action-based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2009): 119–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00403-6.
• Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī. al-Iṣāba fī Tamyīz al-Ṣaḥāba. Ed. Adil Ahmad Abd al-Mowjood and Ali Muhammad Muawwadh. 2 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿİIlmiyya, 1994.
• Ibn Hishām, ʿAbdulmalik. al-Sīra al-Nabawiyya. 2 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Maʿārif, no date.
• Jafarian, Rasool. Political History of Islam, Sirah Rasool God (PBUH). Qom: Dalilema Publishing, 2008.
• Javadi Amolī, Abdollah. Monotheism in the Quran. Qom: Isra, 2004.
• Javadi Amolī, Abdollah. Tasnīm. 4 vols. Qom: Isra, 2014.
• al-Jurjānī, Ali b. Muḥammad. al-Taʿrifāt. Egypt: N.p., 1927.
• Karimi, Youssef. Social Psychology. Tehran: Arsbaran Publications, 2005.
• Mughniyya, Muḥammad Jawād. Tafsīr al-Kāshif. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, 2003.
• Mitchell, Geoffrey Duncan. A New Dictionary of Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.
• Nahj al-Balāgha. Ed. Sobhi Saleh. Qom: Hejrat, 1414.
• Palahuddin. “The Typology of Religious Thought in Muhammadiyah.” International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 3: 2 (2020):74-81.
• Perugini, Marco and Mark Conner. “Predicting and Understanding Behavioral Volitions: The Interplay between Goals and Behaviors.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30:5 (2000): 705-731. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<705::AID-EJSP18>3.0.CO;2-#
• Powell, Caitlin A.J. and Richard H. Smith. “Schadenfreude Caused by the Exposure of Hypocrisy in Others.” Self and Identity, 12:4 (2013): 413-431.
• Qāsimī, Muḥammad Jamāluddīn. Tafsīr al-Qāsimī. Beyrūt: Dār Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyyah, 1997.
• Rafipoor, Faramarz. The Anatomy of Society: An Introduction to Applied Sociology. Tehran: Publishing Company, 2006.
• Sarookhani, Bagher. Research Methods in Social Sciences. Tehran: Institute for Humanities Publications, 2003.
• Shayan Mehr, Alireza. A Comparative Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. Tehran: Kayhan, 1998.
• Schultz, Duane. Growth Psychology: Models of the Healthy Personality. Trans. G. Khoshdel. Tehran: Nashr-e No, 1990.
• Salibi, Jacenthe. Descriptive Dictionary of Educational Psychology‬. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2003.
• Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. 3 vols. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom Publications, 1996.
• al-Ṭabarsī, Faḍl b. Ḥasan. Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. 2 vols. Tehran: Nasser Khosrow, 1993.
• al-Ṭabarī, Ebū Jaʿfar Muḥammad b. Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. 3 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Maʿrifa, 1992.
• al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad b. Ḥasan. al-Tebyān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. 3 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Ehyā al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, no date.
• Veronica Siregar, Sylvia and Sidharta Utama. “Type of Earnings Management and the Effect of Ownership Structure, Firm Size, and Corporate-Governance Practices: Evidence from Indonesia.” The International Journal of Accounting 43: 1 (2008): 1-27.
• al-Wāqidī, Muḥammad b. ʿUmar. al-Maghāzi. 2 vols. Beyrūt: Al-Aʿlami Institute, 1989.
• al-Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar. al-Kashshaf ʿan Ḥaqāʾiq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl. 2 vols. Beyrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabī, Third Edition, 1986.
• “The Quran.” Trans. Sahih International. https://corpus.quran.com. (27.01.2023).