DEVELOPING A SCALE TO EVALUATE TURKISH PRIMARY SCHOOL SECOND GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING PROGRAM

Year 2019, , 12 - 34, 20.12.2019

Ali Erarslan , Ece Zehir Topkaya

https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.664164

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In Turkey, three major English Language Teaching Program (ELTP) changes have taken place since the first ELTP introduced in 1997. Following the 2006 ELTP, a new program was launched in 2013 with the common name known as 4+4+4 education system with whichEnglish Language Teaching Program was started from the 2ndgrades in primary schools. Due to lack of a valid and reliable evaluation tool in literature, this study aims to develop and validate a scale to evaluate the 2ndgrade ELTP that is currently in use in the Turkish education system. The scale development steps of DeVellis (2003) were followed and 84 items were pooled via conducting a literature review and document analysis, surveying the opinions of 15 primary school language teachers and utilizing interviews with 5 teachers. With the participation of 118 teachers, the first version of the scale was submitted to exploratory factor analysis, which yielded a five-factor solution with 34 items. This revised version was then administered to 85 teachers to conduct confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. In its final form, the scale consisted of 28 items with 5 factors, the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients of which ranging from .86 to .93. The results indicate that the scale can be used toevaluate the 2ndgrade ELTP.

Keywords

2ndGrade ELTP, Evaluation, Program, 4+4+4 Education System

References

• ADAIR-HAUCK, B., Willingham-MacLain, L., & Earnest-Youngs, B. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.17.2.269-306.
• ADAIR-HAUCK, B., Willingham-MacLain, L., & Earnest-Youngs, B. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.17.2.269-306.
• ALDERSON, C., & Beretta, A. (1992). Evaluating Second Language Education.Cambridge University Press.
• ALKAN, M. F., & Arslan, M. (2014). İkinci Sınıf İngilizce Öğretim Programının Değerlendirilmesi * Evaluation of the 2 nd Grade English Language Curriculum. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve ÖğretimÇalışmaları Dergisi, 4(7), 87–99.
• ANDREASSEN, T. W.; Lorentzen, B. G.; Olsson, U. H. (2006). The impact of non-normality and estimation methods in SEM on satisfaction research in marketing. Quality & Quantity, 40(1), 39-58.
• ANGHEL, B., & Cabrales, A. (2012). Evaluating a bilingual education program in Spain : the impact beyond foreign language learning.In Working Paper -Economic Series, May 2012. Retrieved from: http.//earchivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/id/65176/we1214.pdf
• AYBEK, B. (2015). İlkokul İkinci Sınıf İngilizce Dersinin İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerine Dayalı olarak Değerlendirilmesi. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume, 10, 67–84.
• BAŞOL, G., & Bardakci, S. (2008). A Qualitative Study On Changes Of Educational Values Among Teacher. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8(May), 467–479.
• BAYRAKTAR, B. (2014). İlkokul 2.sınıf İngilizce dersi öğretim programının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi(Unpublished Master’s Thesis).Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa.
• BOZAVLI, E. (2015). İlkokul 2. Sınıfta Yabancı Dil Öğretiminin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Ines Journal, 2(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.16991/INESJOURNAL.19
• BROWN, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Massachusetts: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
• BULUT, İ., & Atabey, E. (2016). İlkokul İkinci Sınıf İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programının Uygulamadaki Etkililiğinin Değerlendirilmesi. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17679/INUEFD.17366404.
• BÜYÜKDUMAN, F. İ. (2001). The opinions of primary school teachers of English on the syllabus of English as a second language inprimary school fourth and fifth grades(Unpublished Master's Thesis). Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
• CELIK, S., & Kasapoglu, H. (2014). Implementing the recent curricular changes to English language instruction in Turkey: opinions and concerns of elementary school administrators. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-14.
• CHEN, A. H. (2013). An evaluation on primary English education in Taiwan: From the perspective of language policy. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 158–165Council of Europe (2001a). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment, Cambridge: CUP.
• COŞKUN, K., Küçüktepe, S. E., & Baykın, Y. (2014). İkinci Sınıf İngı̇lı̇zceDersı̇Ve Programına İlı̇şkı̇n Öğretmen Görüşlerı̇nı̇n İncelenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğiitm Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(22), 55–78.
• DEMIREL, Ö. (2013). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme-Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.DEVELLIS, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• ER, K. O. (2006). Evaluation of English Curricula in 4th and 5th Grade Primary Schools. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 1-25.
• ERDOĞAN, V. (2005). An Evaluation of the English Curriculum Implemented at the 4th and 5th Grade Primary State Schools: The Views of the Teachers and the Students(Unpublished MA Thesis). Mersin University, Institute of Social Sciences, Mersin.
• EKUŞ, B., & Babayiğit, Ö. (2014). İlkokul 2. siniftan itibaren yabanci dil eğitimi verilmesine ilişkin sinif ve ingilizce öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Researcher: Social Science Studies, 40–49.
• GÖK, F. (2007). The History and Development of Turkish Education. Education in ‘Multicultural’ Societies –Turkish and Swedish Perspectives, eds. Marie Carlson, Annika Rabo and Fatma Gök, Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, Transactions, vol. 18 (Stockholm 2007), pp. 247-255.
• HAIR Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis(Seventh Ed). Essex: Pearson.
• HAMMAD, E. A. R. (2014). Palestinian EFL Teachers ’ Attitudes Towards English Textbooks Used at the First Three Grades of Elementary School. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, (May), 1–18.
• HOOPER, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• İĞREK, G. E. (2001). Öğretmenlerin ilköğretim İngilizce programına ilişkin görüşleri(Unpublished Master's Thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• İYITOGLU, O., & Alci, B. (2015). A Qualitative Research on 2nd Grade Teachers’ Opinions about 2nd Grade English Language Teaching Curriculum. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 682–696.
• KIRKGOZ, Y. (2009). Globalization and English Language Policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(2006), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808316319.
• KÜÇÜK, Ö. (2008). An Evaluation of English Language Teaching Program At Key Stage I and the Opinions of Teachers regarding the Program(Unpublished MA Thesis). Çanakkale 18 Mart University, Institute of Social Sciences, Çanakkale.
• LYNCH, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation. Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University PressMERTER, F., Şekerci, H., & Bozkurt, E. (2014). İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin İkinci Sınıf İngilizce Dersine İlişkin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Asos Journal, 2(5), 199–210.
• MIN, C. K. (2007). Innovative English Education Curricula and the Strategies of Implementation in Korea. In Y. H. Choi & B. Spolsky (Eds.), ELTCurriculum Innovation and Implementation in Asia(pp. 101–129). Asia TEFL.MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2013). İlköğretim Kurumları (İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar) İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara
• MUSAL, B., Taskiran, C., Gursel, Y., Ozan, S., Timbil, S., & Velipasaoglu, S. (2014). An Example of Program Evaluation Project in Undergraduate Medical Education,Education for Health, 21(1): 1-7.
• NUNAN, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning.Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.COSTELLO, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
• ÖZÜDOĞRU, F., & Adıgüzel, O. C. (2015). Evaluation of primary school 2nd grade English Language Teaching Curriculum. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1251–1276.
• PALLANT, J. (2002). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
• PHELPS, R. (2011). Improving Practice Through Program Evaluation. Centre for Children and Young People Background Briefing Series, no.8. Lismore: Centre for Children and Young People, Southern Cross University.
• QI, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China:perceptions of students.Multilingual Education, 6(1). Retrieved from https://multilingual-education.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13616-016-0026-0.
• SAK, Ö. (2008). Evaluation of the English programme for primary education according to teachers' opinions(Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal Univeristy, Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.
• SEÇKIN, H. (2010). Evaluation of Fourth Grade English Language Program(Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• SLAVEC, A., & Drnovesek, M. (2012). A perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Economic and Business Review, 14(1), 39–62.
• TOK, H. (2003). İlköğretim birinci kademesinde yabancı dil öğretiminde karşılaşılan sorunların değerlendirilmesi(Unpublished Master's thesis). İnönü University, Malatya.TOSUNCUK, Ö. (2016).İlkokulda İngilizce Öğretiminin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre İncelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi.
• WILLIAMS, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis : A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramadicine, 8(3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1373&context=jephc.
• YANIK, A. E. (2007). A study of English language curriculum implementation in 6th, 7th and 8th grades of public primary schools through teachers’ and students’ perceptions (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• YILDIRAN, Ç., & Tanrıseven, I. (2015). Teachers ’ Opinions on the English Curriculum of the 2nd Grade Primary Education.International Journal of Language Academy, 3(1), 210–223.
• YONG, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis : Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology,9(2), 79–94.
• ZEHIR TOPKAYA, E. & Küçük, Ö. (2010). An evaluation of 4th and 5th grade English language teaching program. Elementary Education Online, 9(1), 52–65.
• ZINCIR, B. (2006). 5th grade English teachers’ evaluations of curriculum objectives(Unpublished MA Thesis). Anadolu University, Eskisehir.