Theoretical Approaches to the Black Sea Region: ‘Is the Wider Black Sea Area a Region?’

Year 2020, Issue: 5, 171 - 190, 27.12.2020

Nasuh Sofuoğlu

Abstract

The paper aims to shed light on how a region may be built out of the Black Sea area. Therefore, the paper asks, first, whether the Black Sea area is a region or a region-to-be. If neither, then how to transform the Black Sea area into a region through the context of ‘new regionalism’ and the relevant theories. First, it delves into defining what it means to be a ‘region’ in the context of ‘new regionalism’. Then, three different theories, i.e. neo-functionalism, neo-liberal institutionalism and constructivism, are unravelled to lay the foundation for the main query of the paper – ‘is the Wider Black Sea area a region’. Constructivism provides fertile ground for the most appropriate premises for constructing a region around the Black Sea in relation to new regionalism. Accordingly, the paper discovers the perils and opportunities lying ahead of any initiative to construct a region out of the Black Sea area. The paper offers that the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) acts as an anchor of the Wider Black Sea area and a catalyst for a new understanding of regionalism which is capable of taking root and thriving in the Black Sea area.

Keywords

Neo-functionalism, Neo-liberal institutionalism, Constructivism, Wider Black Sea Area, Regionalism

References

• Celac, Sergiu. “The Role and Potential of The Organization of the BSEC.” Centre for International and European Studies, vol. 1, (2017): 1-7.
• Ciută, Felix. “Parting the Black Sea (Region): Geopolitics, Institutionalisation and the Reconfiguration of European Security.” European Security, 16(1) (2007): 51-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830701442402
• Ciută, Felix. “Region? Why Region? Security, Hermeneutics, and the Making of the Black Sea Region.” Geopolitics, 13(1) (2008): 120-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701783367
• Emerson, R. Guy. “An Art of the Region: Towards a Politics of Regionness.” New Political Economy, 19(4) (2013): 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.829434
• Ethier, Wilfred. “The New Regionalism.” The Economic Journal, 108(449) (1998): 1149-1161. Fabbri, Claudia M. “The Constructivist Promise and Regional Integration: An Answer to 'Old' and 'New' Puzzles. The South American case.” Working Paper (Coventry: University of Warwick, 2005).
• Fawn, Rick. “‘Regions’ and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Whereto?,” Review of International Studies, 35(S1) (2009): 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210509008419
• Gochhayat, Aratrana. “Regionalism and sub-regionalism: A Theoretical Framework with Special Reference to India.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 8(1) (2014): 10-26. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2013.0611
• Hajizada, Mukhtar, & Marciacq, Florent. “New Regionalism in Europe's Black Sea Region: The EU, BSEC and Changing Practices of Regionalism.” East European Politics, 29(3) (2013): 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.807800
• Hamilton, Daniel. S. and Mangott, Gerhard. The Wider Black Sea Region in the 21st Century. (Washington, D.C.: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2008).
• Hettne, Björn. “Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism.” New Political Economy, 10(4) (2005): 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344484
• Hettne, Björn. “The New Regionalism Revisited.” In Theories of New Regionalism, eds. Fredrick Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 22-42. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective.” In Regionalism in World Politics, eds. Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, 58-66. New York: Oxford UP, 1995a.
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics.” Review of International Studies, 21(4) (1995b): 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500117954
• Manoli, Panagiota. “Black Sea Regionalism in Perspective.” Centre for International and European Studies, vol. 2 (2011): 1-8.
• Mittelman, James. H. “Rethinking the “New Regionalism” in the Context of Globalization.” Global Governance, 2(2) (1996): 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-002-02-90000004
• Ndayi, Zoleka V. “‘Theorising the Rise of Regionness’ by Bjorn Hettne and Fredrik Soderbaum.” Politikon, 33(1) (2006): 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340600618180
• Nye, Joseph S. “Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration.” International Organization, 19(4) (1965): 870-884. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300012649
• Rumelili, Bahar. “Bölgeselcilik ve İnşacılık: Kazanımlar ve Vaatler.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 12 (46) (2015): 168-185. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.463033
• Secrieru, Stanislav. “Protracted Conflicts in the Eastern Neighborhood: Between Averting Wars and Building Trust.” Centre for International and European Studies, vol. 6 (2013): 1-13.
• Söderbaum, Fredrik. “Introduction: Theories of New Regionalism.” In Theories of New Regionalism, eds. Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 1-21. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
• Söderbaum, Fredrik. “Theories of Regionalism.” In Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, eds. Mark Beson and Richard Stubbs, 11-21. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
• Tavares, Rodrigo. The State of the Art of Regionalism, The Past, Present and Future of a Discipline. UNU-CRIS Working Papers, (United Nations University, 2004).
• Triantaphyllou, Dimitrios. “The Complexities of Black Sea Regional Security.” The Centre for Governance and Culture in Europe, 6, 2012.
• Troebst, Stefan, “The Black Sea as Historical Meso-Region: Concepts in Cultural Studies and the Social Sciences,” Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, 2 (2019): 11-29.
• Vayrynen, Raimo. “Regionalism: Old and New.” International Studies Review, 5(1) (2003): 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501002