Türkiye Finansal Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisinin İnşaası

Year 2021, , 115 - 145, 10.08.2021

Metin Pişkin

https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.986664

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma var olan en güncel veriler kullanılarak Türkiye için Finansal Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi (FSHM) oluşturmayı hedeflemektedir. FSHM inşasında Türkiye ekonomisinin yapısal
özellikleri kaynak akım tabloları eşliğinde gösterilirken, farklı hesapların birleştirilmesi işlemleri detaylı olarak sunulmaktadır. Ülkemizde ne yazık ki veri yetersizliği sebebiyle Finansal
Genel Denge Modelleri yaygın olarak kullanılamamıştır. Oluşturulan bu FSHM’nin araştırmacılar tarafından bu alandaki yapılacak çalışmalara önemli bir zemin hazırlayacağı
düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca FSHM inşasında izlenilen yol ve kullanılan verilerin birbiriyle tutarlı olarak işlenebilmesi açısından bu çalışmanın katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

sosyal hesaplar matrisi, finansal iktisat, genel denge modelleri

Construction of Financial Accounting Matrix for Turkey

Abstract

Keywords

Sosyal hesaplar matrisi

References

• 1. Adelman, I., Yeldan, A. E., Sarris, A.ve Roland-Holst, D. W. (1989). Optimal adjustment to trade shocks under alternative development strategies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11:451-505.
• 2. Aslan, M. (2007). The Construction of a Financial Social Accounting Matrix for the Turkish Economy with 1996 Data. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1): 287-306.
• 3. Celasun, M. (1986). A general equilibrium model of the Turkish economy, SIMLOG-1. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 13: 29-94.
• 4. Dervis, K., de Melo, J. ve Robinson, S. (1982). General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 5. Emini,A.C. (2002). Building a Social Accounting Matrix with Financial Assets : A Cameroon Application Designed for the IMMPA. ABD: Dünya Bankası Yayınları.
• 6. European Commission ve Eurostat, (2020). Manual on Sources and Methods for the compilation of ESA95 Financial Accounts 2020, http://epp.eurostat. ec.europa.eu
• 7. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F. ve Tarr, D. G. (1993). Trade reform in the partially liberalized economy of Turkey. The World Bank Economic Review, 7: 192-217.
• 8. Helbig, J. (2013). From an Elaborated Financial Social Accounting Matrix (FSAM) to a Full Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for Germany. Mexico, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey
• 9. Hernández, G. (2008). Building a Financial Social Accounting Matrix for Colombia. Applied Economic Studies, 26: 7–26.
• 10. Hubic, A. (2012). A Financial Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Luxembourg. Central Bank of Luxembourg Working Paper, no:72.
• 11. Jellema, T., Keuning, S., McAdam, P., ve Mink, R. (2006). Developing an Accounting Matrix for the Euro Area: Issues and Applications. In: Alain Janvry and Ravi Kanbur (eds.) Poverty, Inequality and Development, Boston, MA, Springer, 261–286.
• 12. Leung, D. ve Secrieru, O. (2012). Real-financial Linkages in the Canadian Economy: An Input–Output Approach. Economic Systems Research, 24: 195–223.
• 13. Lequiller, F. ve Blades, D. (2006). Understanding National Accounts. OECD Publishing.
• 14. Li, J. (2008). The Financial Social Accounting Matrix for China, 2002, and Its Application to a Multiplier Analysis. Forum of International Development Studies, 36: 215–239.
• 15. Miller, R. E., ve Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• 16. Özhan, H. G. (1988). A planning model for Turkey within a social accounting framework, Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 11: 25-52.
• 17. Özhan, H. G. (1989). A planning model for Turkey within a social accounting framework,. Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı
• 18. Pişkin, M. ve Hannum, C.M. (2017). Constructing a multi-regional social accounting Matrix for Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(4):176–196.
• 19. Pyatt G. ve Round, J. I. (1985). Social Accounting Matrices: A Basis for Planning. The World Bank, Washington D C.
• 20. Roberto A. De Santis ve H. Gazi Özhan (1997). Social Accounting Matrix for Turkey 1990. Economic Systems Research, 9(3): 281-285.
• 21. Şenesen, G. G. (1991). A social accounting matrix for Turkey. Tuplum ve Ekonomi, 13:17-42.
• 22. Seventer, D., Hartley, F., Gabriel, S., Davies, R. (2016). A 2012 Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for South Africa. WIDER Working Paper, No. 2016:26, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki.
• 23. Stone, J. R. N. (1961). Social accounts at the regional level: A survey. In: W. Isard and J. Cumberland eds., 1960. Regional economic planning: Techniques of analysis for less developed areas. Paris: OECD.
• 24. Tsujimura, K. ve M. Mizoshita (2003). Asset-Liability-Matrix Analysis Derived from the Flow-ofFunds Accounts: The Bank of Japan’s Quantitative Monetary Policy Examined. Economic Systems Research, 15: 51–67.
• 25. Yeldan, A. E. (1989). Structural adjustment and trade in Turkey: investigating the alternatives “beyond export-led growth”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11:273-296.