ELEKTRONİK BELGE YÖNETİM SİSTEMİ (EBYS) YAZILIMI SEÇİMİNDE ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİ: BİR BELEDİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 15 - 30, 06.08.2018

Engin Çakır

Abstract

e-Devlet uygulamalarının
uzantısı olan Elektronik Belge Yönetim Sistemi (EBYS) ile belgelerin elektronik
olarak arşivlenmesi sağlanmış ve böylece kamu kurumlarının daha izlenebilir ve
denetlenebilir olması amaçlanmıştır. Kamu kurumları tarafından dışarıdan temin
yoluyla sağlanan EBYS yazılımlarının TSE 13298 no.lu standarda uygun olması
gerekmektedir.

Yapılan alan araştırmasında,
kuruma en uygun yazılımın seçiminde, kamu kurumlarının zorluk yaşadıkları
görülmüştür. Uygulama çalışması, bir ilçe belediyesinde EBYS yazılımı seçimi
için yapılmıştır. Çalışmada SWARA yöntemiyle kriter ağırlıkları belirlenmiş,
alternatif EBYS yazılımlarının değerlendirilmesi ise çok kriterli karar verme
yöntemlerinden EDAS yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. Sıralamada en iyi değere sahip EBYS
yazılımı belediyeye önerilmiştir.

Keywords

Elektronik Belge Yönetim Sistemi, EBYS, SWARA Yöntemi, EDAS Yöntemi

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EDMS) SOFTWARE SELECTION WITH MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD: A MUNICIPAL CASE

Abstract

It is enabled to archive the documents electronically with the
Electronic Document Management System, an extension of e-government
applications, and thus it is aimed to make public enterprises more tractable
and controllable. EDMS software outsourced by public institutions are required
to comply with the standard numbered TSE 13298.

The field research show that it is difficult for public enterprises to
choose the most appropriate software. Application of this study has been done
to the selection EDMS software in a district municipality. In the study,
criteria weights are determined by SWARA and the evaluation of alternative EDMS
software is made by EDAS which is a multi-criteria decision-making method. EDMS
software with the best value in the ranking was proposed to the municipality.

References

• Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Decision Making in Machine Tool Selection : An Integrated Approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G Methods. Engineering Economics, 24(1), 5–17.
• Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2014a). Synergies of Data Mining and Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110(2014), 767–776.
• Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2014b). Sales Branches Performance Evaluation: A Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach. 8th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2014” içinde (ss. 1–7). Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
• Alimardani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H. ve Tamošaitienė, J. (2013). A Novel Hybrid SWARA and VIKOR Methodology for Supplier Selection in an Agile Environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3), 533–548.
• Çakır, E. (2017). Kriter Ağırlıklarının SWARA – Copeland Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi: Bir Üretim İşletmesinde Uygulama. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 42–56.
• Çakır, E. ve Kutlu Karabıyık, B. (2017). Bütünleşik SWARA-COPRAS Yöntemi Kullanarak Bulut Depolama Hizmet Sağlayıcılarının Değerlendirilmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 10(4), 417–434.
• Civelek, D. Y. ve Turan, H. K. (2010). Kurumlararası e-Yazışma Çalışma Raporu. Ankara.
• Dehnavi, A., Aghdam, I. N., Pradhan, B. ve Morshed Varzandeh, M. H. (2015). A New Hybrid Model Using Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) Technique and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) for Tegional Landslide Hazard Assessment in Iran. Catena, 135(2015), 122–148.
• Gavcar, E., Coşkun, E., Paksoy, T., Eleren, A., Sulak, H., Özdemir, M., … Keskin, R. (2011). Yöneylem Araştırması. (V. Tecim, Ed.). İstanbul: Lisans Yayıncılık.
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskis, Z. (2017). Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended edas method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 20(1), 48–68.
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. ve Antucheviciene, J. (2017a). A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 112, 156–174.
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. ve Antucheviciene, J. (2017b). A new hybrid simulation-based assignment approach for evaluating airlines with multiple service quality criteria. Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 45–60. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.05.008
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M. ve Turskis, Z. (2016). Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: An application to supplier selection. International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, 11(3), 358–371.
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L. ve Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution ( EDAS ). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451.
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ve Banihashemi, S. S. A. (2014). Personnel Selection Based on a Novel Model of Game Theory and MCDM Approaches. 8th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2014” içinde (ss. 191–198). Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Esfahani, M. H., Bitarafan, M., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Arefi, S. L. (2013). Developing A New Hybrid MCDM Method for Selection of The Optimal Alternative of Mechanical Longitudinal Ventilation of Tunnel Pollutants During Automobile Accidents. Transport, 28(1), 89–96.
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Salimi, J., Maknoon, R. ve Simona, K. (2015). Technology foresight about R&D projects selection; application of SWARA method at the policy making level. Engineering Economics, 26(5), 571–580.
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ve Saparauskas, J. (2013). New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414.
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskis, Z. (2013). Design of Products with Both International and Local Perspectives Based on Yin-Yang Balance Theory and SWARA Method. Economic Research, 26(2), 153–166.
• Juodagalvienė, B., Turskis, Z., Šaparauskas, J. ve Endriukaitytė, A. (2017). Integrated multi-criteria evaluation of house’s plan shape based on the EDAS and SWARA methods. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 9(3), 117–125.
• Kahraman, C., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Cevik Onar, S., Yazdani, M. ve Oztaysi, B. (2017). Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 25(1), 1–12.
• Kandur, H. (2006). Elektronik Belge Yönetimi Sistem Kriterleri Referans Modeli (v.2.0). Ankara: Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
• Karabasevic, D., Paunkovic, H. ve Stanujkic, D. (2016). Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 43–53.
• Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S. ve Maksimovic, M. (2015). Selection of Candidates in the Mining Industry Based on the Application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA Methods. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 20(2), 116–124.
• Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S. ve Maksimovic, M. (2016). An approach to personnel selection based on Swara and Waspas methods. Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 7(1), 1–11.
• Keršulienė, V. ve Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Architect Selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 645–666.
• Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (Swara). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.
• Kikomba, M. K., Mabela, R. M. ve Ntantu, D. I. (2016). Applying EDAS Method to Solve Air Traffic Problems. International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research (IJSIMR), 4(8), 15–23.
• Mavi, R. K., Goh, M. ve Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third - party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5–8), 2401–2418.
• Nezhad, M. R. G., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Moztarzadeh, F., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Bahrami, M. (2015). Planning the priority of high tech industries based on SWARA-WASPAS methodology: The case of the nanotechnology industry in Iran. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1), 1111–1137.
• Odabaş, H. (2008). Elektronik Belge Düzenleme Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye’de e-Devlet Uygulamalarında Elektronik Belge Yönetimi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 121–142.
• Önaçan, M. B. K., Medeni, T. D. ve Özkanlı, Ö. (2012). Elektronik Belge Yönetim Sistemi (EBYS)’nin Faydaları ve Kurum Bünyesinde EBYS Yapılandırmaya Yönelik Bir Yol Haritası. Sayıştay Dergisi, Nisan-Ha(85), 1–26.
• Shukla, S., Mishra, P. K., Jain, R. ve Yadav, H. C. (2016). An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection using SWARA and PROMETHEE method. Int. J. of Intelligent Enterprise, 3(2), 120–147.
• Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A Framework for the Selection of a Packaging Design Based on the SWARA Method. Engineering Economics, 26(2), 181–187.
• Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. ve Turskis, Z. (2017). An extension of the EDAS method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(1), 5–12.
• Tekin, M. (2008). Sayısal Yöntemler. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF.
• Tuş Işık, A. ve Aytaç Adalı, E. (2016). A new integrated decision making approach based on SWARA and OCRA methods for the hotel selection problem. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 8(2), 140–151.
• Ulutaş, A. (2017). EDAS Yöntemi Kullanılarak Bir Tekstil Atölyesi İçin Dikiş Makinesi Seçimi. Journal of Business Research-Türk, 9(2), 169–183.
• Vafaeipour, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Varzandeh, M. H. M., Derakhti, A. ve Keshavarz, M. E. (2014). Assessment of Regions Priority for Implementation of Solar Projects in Iran: New Application of a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 86(2014), 653–663.
• Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Ignatius, J. ve Abad, M. D. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: Application of material selection. Engineering Economics, 27(4), 382–391.
• Yıldırım, B. F. ve Önder, E. (2014). İşletmeciler, Mühendisler ve Yöneticiler için Operasyonel, Yönetsel ve Stratejik Problemlerin Çözümünde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.