Research Article
Year 2017,
Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 22 - 26, 14.06.2017
Abstract
References
- Beben, D., Anigacz, W., and Ukleja, J. 2013. Diagnosis of bedrock course and retaining wall using GPR. NDT and E International, 59, 77-85.
- Chang, C.W., Lin, C.H., and Lien, H.S. 2009. Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1057-1063.
- Dérobert, X., Iaquinta, J., Klysz, G., and Balayssac, J. P. 2008. Use of capacitive and GPR techniques for the non-destructive evaluation of cover concrete. NDT and E International, 41, 44-52.
- Hugenschmidt, J. 2002. Concrete bridge inspection with a mobile GPR system. Journal Construction and Building Materials, 16, 147-154.
- Koşaroğlu, S., Taştan, E., and Bilim, F. 2016. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi Binasının Yer Radarı (GPR) yöntemi ile hasarsız incelenmesi. BEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 77-85 (Turkish).
- Leucci, G., Masini, N., and Persico, R. 2012. Time–frequency analysis of GPR data to investigate the damage of monumental buildings. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 81-91.
- Solla, M., Lorenzo, H., Riveiro, B., and Rial, F.I. (2011). Non-destructive methodologies in the assessment of hte masonry arch bridge of Traba, Spain. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, 828-835.
- Varnavina, A.V., Khamzin, A. K., Sneed, L.H., Torgashov, E.V., Anderson, N.L., Maerz, N.H., and Boyko, K.J. 2015. Concrete bridge deck assessment: Relationship between GPR data and concrete removal depth measurements collected after hydrodemolition. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 26-38.
Identifying of structural elements of building using Ground penetrating radar (GPR): A case study of the Cumhuriyet University, Turkey
Abstract
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most
recommended non-destructive methods in identifying of structural elements of
building. The B building of the Cumhuriyet University, Engineering Faculty was
assessed by using the 1600 MHz antennas. As a result of evaluate of GPR data,
the locations, horizontal and vertical interval, radius and corrosion rate of
reinforcements in curtain walls is determined. It is proposed that the main
reason of the structural changes in the reinforcements may be caused by
groundwater.
References
- Beben, D., Anigacz, W., and Ukleja, J. 2013. Diagnosis of bedrock course and retaining wall using GPR. NDT and E International, 59, 77-85.
- Chang, C.W., Lin, C.H., and Lien, H.S. 2009. Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1057-1063.
- Dérobert, X., Iaquinta, J., Klysz, G., and Balayssac, J. P. 2008. Use of capacitive and GPR techniques for the non-destructive evaluation of cover concrete. NDT and E International, 41, 44-52.
- Hugenschmidt, J. 2002. Concrete bridge inspection with a mobile GPR system. Journal Construction and Building Materials, 16, 147-154.
- Koşaroğlu, S., Taştan, E., and Bilim, F. 2016. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi Binasının Yer Radarı (GPR) yöntemi ile hasarsız incelenmesi. BEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 77-85 (Turkish).
- Leucci, G., Masini, N., and Persico, R. 2012. Time–frequency analysis of GPR data to investigate the damage of monumental buildings. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 81-91.
- Solla, M., Lorenzo, H., Riveiro, B., and Rial, F.I. (2011). Non-destructive methodologies in the assessment of hte masonry arch bridge of Traba, Spain. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, 828-835.
- Varnavina, A.V., Khamzin, A. K., Sneed, L.H., Torgashov, E.V., Anderson, N.L., Maerz, N.H., and Boyko, K.J. 2015. Concrete bridge deck assessment: Relationship between GPR data and concrete removal depth measurements collected after hydrodemolition. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 26-38.
There are 8 citations in total.
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 14, 2017 |
| Submission Date | February 27, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 |