Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2020, , 305 - 320, 01.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320

Abstract

Endüstri 4.0, değer yaratan ağlar oluşturmak adına üretim tesislerini, hizmet sistemlerini ve tedarik zincirlerini entegre eden, köklü değişiklikler yaratan yeni bir teknolojik devrimdir. Otomasyon, üretim teknolojileri ve veri değişimi alanlarında yeni bir eğilim olan Endüstri 4.0’ın nesnelerin interneti, yapay zeka, veri yönetimi, ve siber fiziksel sistemler gibi temel unsurlarının, liman ve terminallerde de operasyon süreçlerini ve elleçlenen yük miktarını etkileyeceği belirtilmektedir. Literatür her ne kadar Endüstri 4.0 için farkındalık yaratma, rehber olma ve önemini tartışma konusunda zengin olsa da limancılık sektörü özelinde endüstri 4.0 tartışmaları eksiktir. Bu çalışmanın amacı akıllı liman dönüşümünde muhtemel zorlukları derlemek ve uzman görüşleri neticesinde bu zorluklar arasındaki ilişkiyi Yorumlayıcı Yapısal Modelleme yöntemi ile analiz ederek hiyerarşik bir model oluşturmaktır. Oluşturulan hiyerarşik ilişkiler modeline göre, akıllı liman olma sürecinde yaşanan en önemli zorluklar Endüstri 4.0 hakkında bilgi eksiklikleri ve personel kaynaklı sıkıntılardır.

References

  • Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10-28.
  • Balci, G., Caliskan, A., & Yuen, K. F. (2019). Relational bonding strategies, customer satisfaction, and loyalty in the container shipping market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
  • Bleicher, J., ve Stanley, H. (2016). Digitization As a Catalyst For Business Model Innovation a Three-Step Approach to Facilitating Economic Success. Journal of Business Management. 12:62-71.
  • Caliskan, A., & Esmer, S. (2019). Does it really worth investing in relationship marketing for a port business?. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 375-383.
  • Caliskan, A., & Karaöz, B. (2019). Can market indicators forecast the port throughput?. International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, 11(1), 45-63.
  • Caliskan, A., & Esmer, S. (2020). An assessment of port and shipping line relationships: the value of relationship marketing. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(2), 240-257.
  • Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F., ve Oliveira, T. (2019). “Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union”. Computers in Industry. 107:22-32.
  • Container Management (2017). DP World and Kazakhstan collaborate on port community system https://container-mag.com/2017/06/16/kazakhstan-trade-corridor/ , Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2019
  • Deloitte (2015). “Industry 4.0. Challenges and solutions for the digital transformationand use of exponential Technologies”. Deloitte. 1–32.
  • Deloitte (2017). “Smart Ports”. Deloitte. 1-20.
  • Dery, K., Sebastian, I. M. ve van der Meulen, N. (2017). The Digital Workplace is Key to Digital Innovation. MIS Quarterly Executive. 16(2):135-152.
  • Duperrin, J. C., & Godet, M. (1973). Matrice d'Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée á un Classement. Rapp. Econ. CEA, 45-51.
  • Esmer, S. (2017). Endüstri 4.0, Lojistik 4.0, Denizcilik 4.0, Liman 4.0…. https://www.7deniz.net/haber-endustri-40-lojistik-40-denizcilik-40-liman-40-22601.html, Erişim Tarihi: 21.06.2019
  • Flynn, J., Dance, S., & Schaefer, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its Potential Impact on Employment Demographics in the UK. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng, 6, 239-244.
  • Gnimpieba, Z. D. R., Nait-Sidi-Moh, A., Durand, D., & Fortin, J. (2015). Using Internet of Things technologies for a collaborative supply chain: Application to tracking of pallets and containers. Procedia Computer Science, 56, 550-557.
  • Haufe, K., Colomo-Palacios, R., Dzombeta, S., Brandis, K., & Stantchev, V. (2016). ISMS core processes: A study. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 339-346.
  • Hussain, M. I. (2017). Internet of Things: challenges and research opportunities. CSI transactions on ICT, 5(1), 87-95.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., ve Sharma, R. (2018). Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Computers in Industry. 101:107-119.
  • Kamigaki, T. (2017). Object‐Oriented RFID with IoT: A Design Concept of Information Systems in Manufacturing. Electronics, 6(1), 14.
  • Karadayi-Usta, S. (2019). An Interpretive Structural Analysis for Industry 4.0 Adoption Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  • Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168-179.
  • Mohammadzadeh, A. K., Ghafoori, S., Mohammadian, A., Mohammadkazemi, R., Mahbanooei, B., & Ghasemi, R. (2018). A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran. Technology in Society, 53, 124-134.
  • Mueller, E., Chen, X. L., & Riedel, R. (2017). Challenges and requirements for the application of industry 4.0: a special insight with the usage of cyber-physical system. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(5), 1050.Port of Rotterdam (2018). Port of Rotterdam teams with IBM Internet of Things to digitize operations https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/port-of-rotterdam-teams-with-ibm-internet-of-things-to-digitize-operations, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019a). Rotterdam sends hyper-smart container on trip around the world https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/rotterdam-sends-hyper-smart-container-on-trip-around-the-world, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019b). Intermodal online route planner Navigate now operational in 2 continents https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/intermodal-online-route-planner-navigate-now-operational-in-2-continents, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019c). Blockchain offers opportunities for cooperation in network that lacks trust https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/blockchain-offers-opportunities-for-cooperation-in-network-that-lacks-trust, Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019d). Port of Rotterdam Authority and DeltaPort are boosting cooperation in North Rhine Westphalia https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/port-of-rotterdam-authority-and-deltaport-are-boosting-cooperation-in-north. Erişim Tarihi: 28.04.2020
  • Port Technology (2016). What is a Smart Port? https://www.porttechnology.org/news/what_is_a_smart_port , Erişim Tarihi: 21.06.2019
  • Self Service Smart Solutions (2018). Kiosk Innova çözümleri ile Marport müşterileri de zamandan kazanıyor https://selfservicesmartsolutions.com/haberler/self-service/marport-kiosklar-ile-musterilere-zaman-kazandiriyor/, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Sevinc, A., Gür, Ş., & Eren, T. (2018). Analysis of the difficulties of SMEs in industry 4.0 applications by analytical hierarchy process and analytical network process. Processes, 6(12), 264.
  • Singh, M. D., & Kant, R. (2008). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), 141-150.
  • Tonn, G., Kesan, J. P., Zhang, L., & Czajkowski, J. (2019). Cyber risk and insurance for transportation infrastructure. Transport policy, 79, 103-114.
  • Türkeș, M. C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H. D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D. I., & Căpușneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and Barriers in Using Industry 4.0: A Perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7(3), 153.
  • Uslu, B., Eren, T., Gür, Ş., & Özcan, E. (2019). Evaluation of the difficulties in the internet of things (IoT) with multi-criteria decision-making. Processes, 7(3), 164.
  • Yan, J., Xin, S., Liu, Q., Xu, W., Yang, L., Fan, L., ... & Wang, Q. (2014). Intelligent supply chain integration and management based on cloud of things. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(3), 624839.
  • Zhou, F., Lim, M. K., He, Y., Lin, Y., & Chen, S. (2019). End-of-life vehicle (ELV) recycling management: Improving performance using an ISM approach. Journal of cleaner production, 228, 231-243.
Year 2020, , 305 - 320, 01.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320

Abstract

References

  • Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10-28.
  • Balci, G., Caliskan, A., & Yuen, K. F. (2019). Relational bonding strategies, customer satisfaction, and loyalty in the container shipping market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
  • Bleicher, J., ve Stanley, H. (2016). Digitization As a Catalyst For Business Model Innovation a Three-Step Approach to Facilitating Economic Success. Journal of Business Management. 12:62-71.
  • Caliskan, A., & Esmer, S. (2019). Does it really worth investing in relationship marketing for a port business?. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 375-383.
  • Caliskan, A., & Karaöz, B. (2019). Can market indicators forecast the port throughput?. International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, 11(1), 45-63.
  • Caliskan, A., & Esmer, S. (2020). An assessment of port and shipping line relationships: the value of relationship marketing. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(2), 240-257.
  • Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F., ve Oliveira, T. (2019). “Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union”. Computers in Industry. 107:22-32.
  • Container Management (2017). DP World and Kazakhstan collaborate on port community system https://container-mag.com/2017/06/16/kazakhstan-trade-corridor/ , Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2019
  • Deloitte (2015). “Industry 4.0. Challenges and solutions for the digital transformationand use of exponential Technologies”. Deloitte. 1–32.
  • Deloitte (2017). “Smart Ports”. Deloitte. 1-20.
  • Dery, K., Sebastian, I. M. ve van der Meulen, N. (2017). The Digital Workplace is Key to Digital Innovation. MIS Quarterly Executive. 16(2):135-152.
  • Duperrin, J. C., & Godet, M. (1973). Matrice d'Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée á un Classement. Rapp. Econ. CEA, 45-51.
  • Esmer, S. (2017). Endüstri 4.0, Lojistik 4.0, Denizcilik 4.0, Liman 4.0…. https://www.7deniz.net/haber-endustri-40-lojistik-40-denizcilik-40-liman-40-22601.html, Erişim Tarihi: 21.06.2019
  • Flynn, J., Dance, S., & Schaefer, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its Potential Impact on Employment Demographics in the UK. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng, 6, 239-244.
  • Gnimpieba, Z. D. R., Nait-Sidi-Moh, A., Durand, D., & Fortin, J. (2015). Using Internet of Things technologies for a collaborative supply chain: Application to tracking of pallets and containers. Procedia Computer Science, 56, 550-557.
  • Haufe, K., Colomo-Palacios, R., Dzombeta, S., Brandis, K., & Stantchev, V. (2016). ISMS core processes: A study. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 339-346.
  • Hussain, M. I. (2017). Internet of Things: challenges and research opportunities. CSI transactions on ICT, 5(1), 87-95.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., ve Sharma, R. (2018). Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Computers in Industry. 101:107-119.
  • Kamigaki, T. (2017). Object‐Oriented RFID with IoT: A Design Concept of Information Systems in Manufacturing. Electronics, 6(1), 14.
  • Karadayi-Usta, S. (2019). An Interpretive Structural Analysis for Industry 4.0 Adoption Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  • Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168-179.
  • Mohammadzadeh, A. K., Ghafoori, S., Mohammadian, A., Mohammadkazemi, R., Mahbanooei, B., & Ghasemi, R. (2018). A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran. Technology in Society, 53, 124-134.
  • Mueller, E., Chen, X. L., & Riedel, R. (2017). Challenges and requirements for the application of industry 4.0: a special insight with the usage of cyber-physical system. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(5), 1050.Port of Rotterdam (2018). Port of Rotterdam teams with IBM Internet of Things to digitize operations https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/port-of-rotterdam-teams-with-ibm-internet-of-things-to-digitize-operations, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019a). Rotterdam sends hyper-smart container on trip around the world https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/rotterdam-sends-hyper-smart-container-on-trip-around-the-world, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019b). Intermodal online route planner Navigate now operational in 2 continents https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/intermodal-online-route-planner-navigate-now-operational-in-2-continents, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019c). Blockchain offers opportunities for cooperation in network that lacks trust https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/blockchain-offers-opportunities-for-cooperation-in-network-that-lacks-trust, Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2019
  • Port of Rotterdam (2019d). Port of Rotterdam Authority and DeltaPort are boosting cooperation in North Rhine Westphalia https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/port-of-rotterdam-authority-and-deltaport-are-boosting-cooperation-in-north. Erişim Tarihi: 28.04.2020
  • Port Technology (2016). What is a Smart Port? https://www.porttechnology.org/news/what_is_a_smart_port , Erişim Tarihi: 21.06.2019
  • Self Service Smart Solutions (2018). Kiosk Innova çözümleri ile Marport müşterileri de zamandan kazanıyor https://selfservicesmartsolutions.com/haberler/self-service/marport-kiosklar-ile-musterilere-zaman-kazandiriyor/, Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2019
  • Sevinc, A., Gür, Ş., & Eren, T. (2018). Analysis of the difficulties of SMEs in industry 4.0 applications by analytical hierarchy process and analytical network process. Processes, 6(12), 264.
  • Singh, M. D., & Kant, R. (2008). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), 141-150.
  • Tonn, G., Kesan, J. P., Zhang, L., & Czajkowski, J. (2019). Cyber risk and insurance for transportation infrastructure. Transport policy, 79, 103-114.
  • Türkeș, M. C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H. D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D. I., & Căpușneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and Barriers in Using Industry 4.0: A Perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7(3), 153.
  • Uslu, B., Eren, T., Gür, Ş., & Özcan, E. (2019). Evaluation of the difficulties in the internet of things (IoT) with multi-criteria decision-making. Processes, 7(3), 164.
  • Yan, J., Xin, S., Liu, Q., Xu, W., Yang, L., Fan, L., ... & Wang, Q. (2014). Intelligent supply chain integration and management based on cloud of things. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(3), 624839.
  • Zhou, F., Lim, M. K., He, Y., Lin, Y., & Chen, S. (2019). End-of-life vehicle (ELV) recycling management: Improving performance using an ISM approach. Journal of cleaner production, 228, 231-243.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Aylin Çalışkan This is me 0000-0002-2658-2761

Publication Date June 1, 2020
Submission Date January 3, 2020
Acceptance Date May 27, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Çalışkan, A. (2020). AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 8(1), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320
AMA Çalışkan A. AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. June 2020;8(1):305-320. doi:10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320
Chicago Çalışkan, Aylin. “AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 8, no. 1 (June 2020): 305-20. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320.
EndNote Çalışkan A (June 1, 2020) AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 8 1 305–320.
IEEE A. Çalışkan, “AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 305–320, 2020, doi: 10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320.
ISNAD Çalışkan, Aylin. “AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 8/1 (June 2020), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320.
JAMA Çalışkan A. AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2020;8:305–320.
MLA Çalışkan, Aylin. “AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, pp. 305-20, doi:10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2020.8/1.305-320.
Vancouver Çalışkan A. AKILLI LİMAN DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ZORLUKLARIN YORUMLAYICI YAPISAL MODELLEME İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2020;8(1):305-20.