The Effects of Order of Lactation on Milk Components in Water Buffalo Raised in Sheep Breeding Research Institute

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 40 - 43, 01.01.2022

İlkay Çetin , Semih Sevim , Mehmet Akif Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1013027

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study was make in order to determine according to the order of lactation, the composition of milk, Murrah x Anatolian Water Buffaloes (M x A) crossbreds raised in Institute conditions. The animal material consisted of total of 47 heads M x A crossbreeds cows. The data of the study included between February 2016 - January 2018. Actual milk yield was used to determine average lactation length and lactation milk yield. Milk samples were taken to specify the milk components. The fat, nonfat dry matter, protein, and lactose contents of water buffalo milk samples were determined by using a Funke Gerber® milk analyzer. Lactation length and lactation milk yield were found to be 259 days and 1343.14 liters respectively. The least square means were found fat, nonfat dry matter, protein, and lactose, 7.20%, 10.66%, 4.00%, and 5.88% respectively. The milk yield in the first and second lactations of G2 (M x A) crossbreeds and Murah genotype were higher than others in the present study. A negative correlation between milk yield and milk fat is expected. Although not statistically significant, a negative correlation was determined as expected.

Keywords

Water buffalo, Anatolian, Murrah, Milk component

Supporting Institution

Bandırma Koyunculuk Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü

Project Number

TAGEM/HAYSÜD/G/21/A4/P1/2720

Thanks

The data obtained within the scope of the "Breeding of the Anatolian Buffalo" project numbered TAGEM/HAYSÜD/G/21/A4/P1/2720 supported by the General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies were used. The study was presented as a poster at the “1st International Livestock Science Congress, Antalya (2019)”

References

• Afzal M, Anvar M, Mırza M A. 2007. Some factors affecting milk yield and lactation length in nili ravi buffaloes. Pakistan Vet J, 27(3):113-117.
• Anonymous 2019. Food agriculture and organization of the united nations crops and livestock products. URL: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed date: November 08, 2019).
• Anonymous 2020. Data of the ministry of agriculture and forestry, general directorate of livestock. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/HAYGEM.pdf (accessed date: June 14, 2021).
• Ariota B, Campanile G, Potena A, Napolano R, Gasparrini B, Neglia G L, DiPalo R. 2007. Ca and P in buffalo milk: Curd yield and milk clotting parametters. Ital J Anim Sci, 6(6) (Suppl 1): 497-499.
• Atasever S, Erdem H. 2008. Manda Yetiştiriciliği ve Türkiye’deki Geleceği. OMÜ Zir Fak Derg, 23(1):59-64 .
• Cockrill, R. W. 1974. The husbandry and health of the domestic buffalo. FAO, Rome, Italy, Access no: 27627, 1st ed., pp. 993.
• Gürsoy A. 2020. Sütün bileşimi ve özellikleri: Süt kimyası ve biyokimyası. URL: http://cv.ankara.edu.tr/duzenleme/kisisel/dosyalar/06012015013030.pdf (accessed date: April 15, 2020).
• Ilieva Y, Peeva T Z. 2007. Productive life in buffalo cows and effect of some factors on it. In: Proceedings 8th World buffalo Congress, It J Animal Sci, 19-22 October, Caserta, 2:375-377.
• Mahmood A, Usman S. 2010. A Comparative study on the physicochemical parameters of milk samples collected from buffalo, cow, goat and sheep of Gujrat, Pakistan. Pakistan J Nutr, 9(12): 1192-1197.
• SPSS 2015. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• Özkan Z, Arslan S, Uçurum I, Canik F, Uzun B. 2017. Samsun ilinde manda yetiştiriciliği faaliyetine yer veren işletmelerin mevcut durum analizi. Tarımsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü, Publication number: 292, pp: 1-8.
• Soysal, İ. 2006. Manda ve ürünleri üretimi. Tekirdağ University, Tekirdağ, Turkey, 1st ed., pp. 237.
• Şekerden Ö, Tapkı İ, Kaya S. 1999. Anadolu mandalarında Hatay ili köy şartlarında verim mevsimi ve laktasyon dönemi ile süt verimi ve kompozisyonundaki değişiklikler. Ataturk Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 30: 161-168.
• Şekerden Ö. 2000. Büyükbaş hayvan yetiştirme (Manda yetiştiriciliği), Hatay. URL: http://ozelsekerden.com/yukleme/es9702.pdf (accessed date: November 10, 2019)
• Şekerden Ö, Avşar Y K. 2008. Anadolu mandalarinda süt kompozisyonu, rennet pihtilaşma süresi, üre muhtevasi ve bunlari etkileyen çevre faktörleri. Hayvansal Üret, 49(2): 7-14.
• Şekerden Ö. 2016. Her yönüyle manda. URL: http://www.ozelsekerden.com/yukleme/sr186.pdf (accessed date: May 08, 2020)
• Subasinghe DHA, Horadogoda NU, Abeygunawardena H, Siriwardene JA de S. 1998. Water buffalo–improved utilisation through new technologies. URL: http://dl.nsf.ac.lk/handle/1/5308 (accessed date: April 15, 2020).
• Zava M A, Sansinena M. 2017. Buffalo milk characteristics and by-products. In: Pressice GA, editors. : The Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) production and research. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd., Rome, Italy, 1st ed., pp.262-297.