Phenological and Pomological Characteristics of Rosa canina L. Species Cultivated and Naturally Distributed in Amasya Province

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 6, 622 - 630, 01.11.2023

Ferhat Duran , Dudu Duygu Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1356222

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the phenological and pomological characteristics of R. canina species cultivated and naturally distributed in Amasya province. Rosa canina is one of the important plants distributed worldwide and used in food, medicine, raw materials, and landscaping. The research was carried out in 2022 using cultivated and naturally growing rosehip plants and their fruits in Suluova (Bayırlı Village and Yüzbeyi Village) and Taşova (Esençay Village and Kırkharman Village) districts of Amasya province. The phenological characteristics of the species were observed between April and December. The height (cm), average crown width (cm), and number of branches were measured from north-south and east-west directions of the natural and cultivated rosehip species; the number of fruits and fruit weight of the fruits sampled from 10 individuals were measured by weighing them on a precision balance. The thorniness of the natural and cultivated rosehip plants selected in each location in the study was scored as Very; 3, Moderate; 7, Less; 10. According to the findings, the most significant difference between naturally grown rosehip and cultivated rosehip plants in terms of phenological periods is the ripening time of the fruits. Plant height varied between 180.10±11.94 -78.00±8.45 in cultivated R. canina species and between 119.50±56.34 and 89.00±50.43 in wild species. Crown width ranged between 288.90±12.35 cm and 89.40±2.23 cm in cultivated individuals and between 146.10±7.38 cm and 123.20±7.30 cm in wild species. The number of branches was found between 14.70±4.39 and 6.20±1.22 in cultivated individuals and between 11.20±4.36 and 8.70±5.81 in wild individuals. The study, it was observed that the thorniness was low or moderate in all cultivated rosehip plants. Fruit weight, fruit diameter, and fruit length ranged between 2.29±0.18 and 1.97±0.28; 14.27±0.64 and 12.93±0.59; 20.27±0.80 and 20.10±1.42 in wild R. canina individuals, respectively. In cultivated R. canina species, fruit weight, fruit diameter, and fruit length ranged from 3.48±0.12 to 2.61±0.28; 17.21±0.85 to 15.53±0.97; 26.65±0.85 to 20.16±0.72, respectively. Fruit weight and fruit diameter of cultivated and wild rose hips were statistically different in different locations.

Keywords

Rosa canina L., Phenology, Fruit characteristics, Culture, Wild, Amasya

Supporting Institution

Amasya Üniversitesi

Project Number

FMB-BAP 22-0564

Thanks

This study was financially supported by the Amasya University Research Foundation [Project Code: FMB-BAP 22-0564].

References

• Ahmad N, Anwar F. 2016. Rose hip (Rosa canina L.) oils. Essent Oils Food Preserv Flavor Safety, 2016: 667-675.
• Akkuş E. 2016. Morphological description of wild rosehips (Rosa spp.) genotypes growing in Hamur (Agri). MSc Thesis, Ordu University, Institute of Science, Ordu, Türkiye, pp: 114.
• Anşin R, Kılınç M. 1996. Doğu karadeniz bölgesinde yetişen doğal Rosa L. taksonları. Kuşburnu Sempozyumu, September 05-06, 1996, Gümüşhane, Türkiye, pp: 85-95.
• Arslan N, Gürbüz B, Gümüşçü A. 1996. Kuşburnunun kültüre alınması ve ıslahının temel ilkeleri. Kuşburnu Sempozyumu, September 05-06, 1996, Gümüşhane, Türkiye, pp: 149-156.
• Baloğlu T, Bilir N. 2020. Kuşburnu’nda (Rosa canina L.) bazı meyve ve büyüme özellikleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniv Fen Bil Enst Derg, 11(2): 124-129.
• Baytop T. 2004. Türkiye’de botanik tarihi araştırmaları. TÜBİTAK yayınları, Akademik Dizi. Yenigün Matbaası, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Cagle P, Idassi O, Carpenter J, Minor R, Göktepe I, Martin P. 2012. Effect of rosehip (Rosa canina) extracts on human brain tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Cancer Ther, 3: 534-545.
• Çelik F. 2007. Selection of rose hips (Rosa spp.) genetic resources in Van Lake basin and identification of their biological diversity. PhD Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science, Van, Türkiye, pp: 210.
• Chrubasik C, Roufogalis BD, Müller-Ladner U, Chrubasik S. 2008. Rosa canina etkisi ve etkinlik profilleri üzerine sistematik bir inceleme. Fitoterapi Araşt Derg, 22(6): 725-733.
• Demir F, Özcan M. 2001. Chemical and technological properties of rose (Rosa canina L.) fruits grown wild in Turkey. J Food Eng, 47(4): 333-336.
• Dölek Ü. 2008. Improvement of rose hips (Rosa spp.) by selection wild grown in Amasya province, MSc Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Institute of Science, Tokat, Türkiye, pp: 97.
• Ekincialp A, Kazankaya A. 2012. Hakkari yöresi kuşburnu genotiplerinin (Rosa spp.) bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Tarım Bil Derg, 22(1): 7-11.
• Ekincialp A. 2007. Hakkari yöresinde kuşburnu (Rosa spp.) tiplerinin seleksiyonu, MSc Thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science, Van, Türkiye, pp: 56.
• Encü T. 2015. Determination of pomologi̇cal and some biochemical properties of rosehip (Rosa canina L.) fruit taken from different locations (Van-Hakkari-Şırnak) of Eastern Anatolia Region. MSc Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science, Van, Türkiye, pp: 93.
• Engin SP, Boz Y. 2019. Ülkemiz üzümsü meyve yetiştiriciliğinde son gelişmeler. Uluslararası Anadolu Ziraat Müh Bil Derg, 1: 108-115.
• Ercişli S. 1996. Gümüşhane ve ilçelerinde doğal olarak yetişen kuşburunların (Rosa spp.) seleksiyon yoluyla ıslahı ve çelikle çoğaltma imkanları üzerinde bir araştırma. PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Science, Erzurum, Türkiye, pp: 174.
• Ercisli S. 2005. Rose (Rosa spp.) germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resour Crop Evol, 52: 787-795.
• Ghazghazi H, Miguel MG, Weslati M, Hasnaoui B, Sebei H, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Figueiredo AC. 2012. Chemical variability of the essential oils from Rosa canina L. and Rosa sempervirens L. flowers collected at Tunisia. J Essent Oil Res, 24(5): 475-480.
• Güleryüz M, Ercişli S. 1996. Kuşburnu yetiştiriciliği. Kuşburnu Sempozyumu, September 05-06, 1996, Gümüşhane, Türkiye, pp: 103-117.
• Güneş M, Güneş S, Dölek Ü. 2017. “Yıldız” Kuşburnu (Rosa canina) çeşidinin bazı fenolojik, pomolojik ve morfolojik özellikleri. J Agri Fac Gaziosmanpaşa Univ, 34(1): 170-178.
• Güneş M, Şen SM. 2001a. Tokat yöresinde yetişen kuşburunların (Rosa spp.) seleksiyon yoluyla ıslahı. Bahçe Derg, 30(1-2): 9-16.
• Güneş M, Şen SM. 2001b. Bazı kuşburnu tiplerinin (Rosa spp.) odun çelikleriyle çoğaltılabilirlikleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Bahçe Derg, 30: 17-24.
• Gyan KY, Woodell SRJ. 1987. Analysis of insect pollen loads and pollination efficiency of some common insect visitors of four species of woody Rosaceae. Functional Ecol, 1987: 269-274.
• Horváth G, Molnár P, Radó-Turcsi E, Deli J, Kawase M, Satoh K, Molnár J. 2012. Carotenoid composition and in vitro pharmacological activity of rose hips. Acta Biochimica Polonica, 59(1). DOI: 10.18388/abp.2012_2187.
• İpek P, Balta F. 2020. Fruit properties of rose hip (Rosa spp.) genotypes selected from Akkuş, Ordu province. Yuzuncu Yıl Univ J Agri Sci, 30(2): 338-344.
• Javid D, Ezgi AS, Oztinen N, Beste Atlı, Kosar M. 2021. Antiradical activities and phenolic compositions of Rosa canina L. from Iran and Turkey. EMU J Pharm Sci, 4(1): 28-35.
• Karakaya T. 2016. The potential distribution of the ecological features of dog rose (Rosa canina L.) in modeling and mapping the Gaziantep region of Nur mountain. PhD Thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Science, Eskişehir, Türkiye, pp: 117.
• Kazankaya A, Yılmaz H, Yılmaz M. 2001. Adilcevaz Yöresinde Doğal Olarak Yetişen Kuşburnuların (Rosa spp.) Seleksiyonu. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Zir Fak Tarım Bil Derg, 11(2): 29-34.
• Kızılcı G. 2005. Adaptation of some rosehip (Rosa spp.) types to Erzincan ecology conditions (selection II). MSc Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Institute of Science, Tokat, Türkiye, pp: 51.
• Koçan N. 2010. Peyzaj planlama ve tasarım çalışmalarında kuşburnu. Harran Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 14(4): 33-37.
• Kühn BF. 1992. Hyben. Dyrkning og Anvendelse. Grøn Viden, 69: 1-6.
• Kutbay HG, Kılınç, M. 1996. Kuşburnu (Rosa L.) Türlerinin taksonomik özellikleri ve türkiye’deki yayılışı. Kuşburnu sempozyumu, September 05-06, 1996, Gümüşhane, Türkiye, pp: 75-83.
• Leon LJG, Bertiller MB. 1982. Aspectos Fenologycos de dos communicates del pastizal de la depression del salado (Pgia. De Buenos Aires), Bol Soc Argent Bot, 20: 320-347.
• Nizharadze AN. 1971. Chemical analiysis of the dog rose. Trudy Gruzinskii Nauchno‐Issledovatelshii Institute Pischchevoi Ustavu Rastlinnej Vyroby Piestanocnb, 13: 103-111.
• Nowak R. 2005. Chemical composition of hips essential oils of some Rosa L. species December 13, 2004. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 60(5-6): 369-378.
• Önal A, Oruç Ş. 2012. Kuşburnu (Rosa canina) meyvelerinden elde edilen ekstrakt ile pamuklu ve yünlü kumaşların boyanma özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Bil Araş Derg, 1: 21-26.
• Oyedemi SO, Oyedemi BO, Prieto JM, Coopoosamy RM, Stapleton P, Gibbons S. 2016. In vitro assessment of antibiotic-resistance reversal of a methanol extract from Rosa canina L. S Afr J Bot, 105: 337-342.
• Öz M. 2016. Rosa ve biyolojik aktiviteleri. MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Teknik University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Türkiye, pp: 192.
• Özen M. 2013. Bolu Merkez ilçesinde kuşburnu (Rosa spp.) genetik kaynaklarının seleksiyonu ve antioksidan aktivitelerinin tespiti. MSc Thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Science, Konya, Türkiye, pp: 78.
• Rovná K, Ivanišová E, Žiarovská J, Ferus P, Terentjeva M, Kowalczewski PL, Kaçaniova M. 2020. Characterization of Rosa canina fruits collected in urban areas of Slovakia. genome size, iPBS profiles and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Molecules, 25(8): 1888.
• Sağır S. 2010. Akıncılar yöresinde doğal olarak yetişen kuşburnu tiplerinin (Rosa spp.) seleksiyon yoluyla ıslahı. MSc Thesis, Ordu University, Institute of Science, Ordu, Türkiye, pp: 56.
• Tolekova S, Sharmanov T, Sinyavskiy Y, Berzhanova R, Mammadov R, Aksoy ÖK, Yusifli R. 2020. Antioxidant, pharmacological, medical properties and chemical content of Rosa L. extracts. Int J Second Metab, 7(3): 200-212.
• Türkben C, Çopur U, Tamer E, Şenel Y. 1999. Bursa yöresinde doğal olarak yetişen kuşburnu meyvelerinin bazı özelliklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Türkiye III. Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, September 14-17, 1999, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 14-17.
• Uggla M, Gao X, Werlemark G. 2003. Variation among and between dog rose taxa (Rosa sect. Caninae) in fruit weight, percentages of fruit flesh and dry matter and vitamin C content. Acta Agric, 53: 147-155.
• Url1: https://www.meteoblue.com/tr/hava/historyclimate/climatemodelled/suluova_t%c3%bcrkiye_739251. (accessed date: 26.05.2023).
• Url2: https://www.meteoblue.com/tr/hava/historyclimate/climatemodelled/ta%c5%9fova_ %c3%bcrkiye_739015. (accessed date: 26.05.2023).
• User ET. 1967. Memleketimizde Orta ve Kuzey Anadolu’da yetişen kuşburnunun C vitamini bakımından durumu, bununla ilgili halk gelenekleri hakkında bir araştırma. Türk Hijyen Tecrübi Biyol Derg, 27(1): 39-60.
• Yılmaz S. 1996. Kuşburnu bitkisinin erozyon kontrolündeki yeri ve önemi. Kuşburnu Sempozyumu, September 05-06, 1996, Gümüşhane, Türkiye, pp: 167-186.
• Yilmaz SO, Ercisli S. 2011. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of fruits of some rose species from Turkey. Rom Biotechnol Lett, 16(4): 6407-6411.
• Yörük BE. 2006. Siirt yöresinde yetisen kusburnuların (Rosa spp.) meyve özelliklerinin tanımlanması. MSc Thesis, van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science, Van, Türkiye, pp: 37.