Performance Indicators for Improving Irrigation Management in Aegean District

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 703 - 709, 15.11.2024

Firat Arslan , Demetrio Antonio Zema

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1533322

Abstract

Water is vital for agriculture and its effective use has become imperative. The largest share of freshwater use in the world is in the agricultural sector with a rate of approximately 70%. Therefore, the evaluation of irrigation schemes is of great importance. In Türkiye, irrigation schemes are managed and distributed by organizations such as water user associations, municipalities, and irrigation cooperatives. In Türkiye, irrigation schemes with a service area of 500 ha or more are managed by water user associations. In this study, Ahmetli, Salihli and Menemen water user associations’ irrigation schemes, where the Gediz River is used as a water source, were chosen as materials. The selected irrigation schemes service area constitutes 60% of the total service area in the region (DSI (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works) 2nd Region (Aegean region)). The service area of Ahmetli irrigation scheme is 50,532 ha, 22,797 ha in Salihli and 22,865 ha in Menemen. The main crop pattern of the irrigation area is vineyards, corn and cotton. These irrigation schemes were evaluated using performance indicators such as water supply, irrigation rate, and amount of irrigation water used per unit area. The raw data sets obtained from DSI cover the years 2007 and 2021. As a result, when looking at the average performance, relative water supply, irrigation rate and amount of irrigation water used per unit area were found to be 0.70, 57.99 and 7682.45 m3 ha-1, respectively. Although 70% of the irrigation water need can be met with the water diversion to the system, the irrigation ratio was approximately 58% indicating the problems in transferring water to the system and the irrigation techniques used by farmers on the field are not modern. In addition, the main reasons for the unirrigated areas, are social and economic reasons (137 ha in the Menemen WUA) and the lack of water supply in the Salihli and Ahmetli WUAs, 2319 ha and 11320 ha cannot be irrigated, respectively. Modernization seems inevitable for more effective use of our water resources. The most effective techniques in this modernization are land consolidation, renewal of irrigation channels, extension and consultancy services to farmers, and making water fees according to volume can be counted.

Keywords

Gediz River, Performance assessment, Irrigation rate, Water user associations

Ethical Statement

The paper is presented in International Gediz and Aegean River Basins Symposium (GEDIZSYMP2022) on 28-29 November 2022, and the abstract was published in the Preoceeding Book of the symposium.

References

• Akçay S, Tunalı SP. 2016. Aşağı Büyük Menderes ve Aşağı Gediz Havzası sulama birliklerinin üretim ve su kullanım performanslarının karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tar Araş Derg, 3(1): 64-73.
• Akçay S. 2018. Sulama birliklerinin ekonomik ve kurumsal performansının karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmesi: Batı Ege örneği. Tar Ekon Derg, 24(2): 109-115.
• Akın M, Akın G. 2007. Suyun önemi, Türkiye’de su potansiyeli, su havzalari ve su kirliliği. Ankara Üniv Dil Tarih-Coğ Fak Derg, 47(2): 105-118.
• Akkuzu E, Aşık Ş, Ünal HB, Karataş BS, Avcı M. 2003. Menemen Sol Sahil Sulama Sistemi su dağıtımında yeterliliğin ve değişkenliğin belirlenmesi. Ege Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 40(3): 97-104.
• Arslan F, Córcoles Tendero JI, Rodríguez Díaz JA, Zema DA. 2023. Comparison of irrigation management in water user associations of Italy, Spain and Turkey using benchmarking techniques. Water Res Manag, 37(1): 55-74.
• Arslan F, Değirmenci H. 2018. Sulama Şebekelerinin işletme-bakım ve yönetim modernizasyonunda RAP-MASSCOTE yaklaşımı: Kahramanmaraş Sol Sahil Sulama şebekesi örneği. Atatürk Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 49(1): 45-51.
• Arslan F. 2023. Sulama suyunun fiyatlandırılması ve çiftçilerin ilkim değişikliği adaptasyonu. In: Cengizler İ, Duman S (editors), Tarım, Orman ve Su Bilimlerinde İleri ve Çağdaş Çalışmalar, Duvar Yayınları, İzmir, Türkiye, pp: 217-223.
• Çakmak B, Gökalp Z. 2011. İklim değişikliği ve etkin su kullanımı. Tar Bil Araş Derg, 1: 87-95.
• Çetin Ö, Eylen M, Sönmez FK. 2010. Basınçlı sulama sistemlerinin su kaynaklarının etkin kullanımındaki rolü ve mali desteklerin bu sistemlerin yaygınlaşmasındaki etkisi. Tar Bil Araş Derg, 2: 53-57.
• Dorak S, Aşık BB, Özsoy G. 2019. Tarımda su kalitesi ve su kirliliğinin önemi: Bursa Nilüfer çayı örneği. Bursa Uludağ Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 33(1): 155-166.
• Karaman S, Gökalp Z. 2010. Küresel isınma ve iklim değişikliğinin su kaynakları üzerine etkileri. Tar Bil Araş Derg, 1: 59-66.
• Kartal S, Arslan F, Değirmenci H. 2021. Assessment of maintenance performance in water user associations: a case study of Yozgat province. Atatürk Univ J Agri Fac, 52(1): 36-45.
• Kartal S, Arslan F. 2021. Comparison of methods used in predicting irrigation performance indicators. Turkish J Agri Forest, 45(5): 634-641.
• Kartal S, Değirmenci H, Arslan F. 2020. Assessment of irrigation schemes with performance indicators in southeastern irrigation district of Turkey. J Agri Sci, 26(2): 138-146.
• Kartal S. 2018. Performance assessment of irrigation schemes with multivariate some statistical methods: A case study of Turkey. PhD Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Science, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, pp: 210.
• Kaya N, Çiftçi N. 2016. Sulama birliklerinin tarımsal sulama işletmeciliğindeki rolü, Konya-Çumra Sulama Birliği örneği. Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araşt Derg, 5(2): 45-57.
• Kırtorun E, Karaer F. 2018. Su yönetimi ve suyun sürdürülebilirliği. Sürdürülebilir Müh Uyg Teknol Geliş Derg, 1(2): 151-159.
• Koçman A, Sütgibi S. 2013. Hydrologic characteristics of Gediz River Basin in the context of the environmental components–problems and suggestions. Doğu Coğr Derg, 17(28): 155-174.
• Kurtulmuş E. 2021. Performance analysis and rehabilitation of pressurized irrigation systems operated by on-demand method using various simulation models and algorithms. PhD Thesis, Uludağ University, Institute of Science, Bursa, Türkiye, pp: 167.
• Malano H, Burton M, Makin I. 2004. Benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector: a tool for change. Irrigation and Drainage: J Int Commis Irrigat Drain, 53(2): 119-133.
• Özsoy S. 2009. Water and life: Social importance of water. MSc Thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 202.
• Turan E, Bayrakdar E. 2020. Türkiye’nin su yönetim politikaları: Ulusal güvenlik açısından bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Politik Araş Derg, 6(2): 1-19.
• Ünal HB, Avcı M, Aşık Ş, Akkuzu E, Kılıç M, Karataş BS. 2004. Sulama suyu dağıtımına çiftçi tepkileri: Menemen Sol Sahil sulama sistemi örneği. Ege Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 41(3): 165-175.