Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

WHETHER OPEN INNOVATION IS A BETTER CHOICE AS A MODEL OF INNOVATION FOR ORGANIZATIONS?

Year 2017, Issue: ICOMEP 2017 ÖZEL SAYISI, 123 - 135, 31.12.2017

Abstract

This study
presents a review of innovation models and by taking consideration and
examining these models it is aimed to understand whether the model based on
open innovation is a better choice among all the other models. For
organizations, innovation models generally demonstrate how to work in an
innovative point of view. Companies of today’s business life are striving to
develop their capabilities and their activities to become innovative companies.
Many of the organizations try to find the most suitable and effective
innovation model for themselves to create a difference in their long-term
business life. Success of innovation process of companies basically depends on
success of their innovation model. Innovation models started with simple linear
models and up to this point, they became complex interactive models. Within
these models, the main focus points of open innovation can be explained as
interactive processes, knowledge and technology. Open innovation has its own
characteristics like as other innovation models. It is important to emphasize
that open innovation requires innovative ideas, knowledge from companies, and
so managing wide technological relationships. Becoming as a popular phenomenon
in innovation studies it is also need to be examined. When all innovation
models are evaluated, generally, it can not be said that the open innovation
model can be a better choice despite the fact that open innovations create new
or modified logics and promote collaboration and openness. Therefore, as a
remarkable answer of the problem of this study, strategies of the companies
should be analyzed. In other words,
strategies
of companies play very important role while determining the form of innovation
process.

References

  • Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Ståhlbröst, A. & Svensson, J. (2009). A Milieu for Innovation - Defining Living Labs. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, December 6-9.
  • Caraça, J., Lundvall, B.-Å. & Mendonça, S. (2009). The Changing Role of Science in the Innovation Process: From Queen to Cinderella?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 861-867.‏
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property. California Management Review, 45(3): 33-58.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b).The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35-41.
  • ‏Chesbrough, H. W. (2003c). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 22-28.
  • Docherty, M. (2006). Primer on “Open Innovation”: Principles and Practice. PDMA Visions Magazine, XXX(2), 13-17.‏
  • Du Preez, N. D. & Louw, L. (2008). A Framework for Managing the Innovation Process. In Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, PICMET, pp. 546-558.
  • Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T. & Ollila, S. (2009). Exploring the Field of Open Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3): 326-345.‏
  • Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda. R&D Management, 36(3): 223-228.‏
  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The Future of Open Innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213-221.‏
  • Godin, B. (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6), 639-667.‏
  • Godin, B. (2012). “Pushes and Pulls”: A Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation Working Paper No. 12.
  • Godin, B. & Lane, J. P. (2013). “Pushes and Pulls”: A Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5): 621-654.‏
  • Inauen, M. & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2012). Fostering Radical Innovations with Open Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 212-231.
  • Karchegani, M. R., Sofian, S. & Amin, S. M. (2013). The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Innovation: A Review. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(1): 561-581.‏
  • Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (pp. 275-306). Washington: The National Academies Press.
  • Lazzarotti, V. & Manzini, R. (2009). Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4): 615-636.‏
  • Lord-Tarte, E. (2012). Innovation and the Development of the Canadian Wine Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Telfer School of Management University of Ottawa, Canada.
  • Marinova, D. & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of Innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 44-53). UK: Elsevier Science.
  • Marques, J. P. C. (2014). Closed versus Open Innovation: Evolution or Combination?. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3): 196-203.
  • Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3): 289-302.‏
  • Nicolov, M. & Badulescu, A. D. (2012). Different Types of Innovations Modeling. Annals of DAAAM for 2012 & Proceedings of the 23rd International DAAAM Symposium, 23(1): 1071-1074.
  • Oliveira, M. B. (2014). Technology and Basic Science: The Linear Model of Innovation. Scientiae Studia, 12(SPE), 129-146.‏
  • Robertson, P. L. & Arundel, A. (2013). The Role of R&D in Open and Closed Innovation. In 35th DRUID Celebration Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 17-19.
  • Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3): 221-239.
  • Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the Fifth-Generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, 11(1): 7-31.‏
  • Saviotti, P. P. (1996). Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Tidd, J. (2006). A Review of Innovation Models, Discussion Paper 1. Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London.
  • Trott, P. & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why “Open Innovation” is Old Wine in New Bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4): 715-736.‏

WHETHER OPEN INNOVATION IS A BETTER CHOICE AS A MODEL OF INNOVATION FOR ORGANIZATIONS?

Year 2017, Issue: ICOMEP 2017 ÖZEL SAYISI, 123 - 135, 31.12.2017

Abstract

This study
presents a review of innovation models and by taking consideration and
examining these models it is aimed to understand whether the model based on
open innovation is a better choice among all the other models. For
organizations, innovation models generally demonstrate how to work in an
innovative point of view. Companies of today’s business life are striving to
develop their capabilities and their activities to become innovative companies.
Many of the organizations try to find the most suitable and effective
innovation model for themselves to create a difference in their long-term
business life. Success of innovation process of companies basically depends on
success of their innovation model. Innovation models started with simple linear
models and up to this point, they became complex interactive models. Within
these models, the main focus points of open innovation can be explained as
interactive processes, knowledge and technology. Open innovation has its own
characteristics like as other innovation models. It is important to emphasize
that open innovation requires innovative ideas, knowledge from companies, and
so managing wide technological relationships. Becoming as a popular phenomenon
in innovation studies it is also need to be examined. When all innovation
models are evaluated, generally, it can not be said that the open innovation
model can be a better choice despite the fact that open innovations create new
or modified logics and promote collaboration and openness. Therefore, as a
remarkable answer of the problem of this study, strategies of the companies
should be analyzed. In other words,
strategies
of companies play very important role while determining the form of innovation
process.

References

  • Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Ståhlbröst, A. & Svensson, J. (2009). A Milieu for Innovation - Defining Living Labs. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, December 6-9.
  • Caraça, J., Lundvall, B.-Å. & Mendonça, S. (2009). The Changing Role of Science in the Innovation Process: From Queen to Cinderella?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 861-867.‏
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property. California Management Review, 45(3): 33-58.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b).The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35-41.
  • ‏Chesbrough, H. W. (2003c). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 22-28.
  • Docherty, M. (2006). Primer on “Open Innovation”: Principles and Practice. PDMA Visions Magazine, XXX(2), 13-17.‏
  • Du Preez, N. D. & Louw, L. (2008). A Framework for Managing the Innovation Process. In Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, PICMET, pp. 546-558.
  • Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T. & Ollila, S. (2009). Exploring the Field of Open Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3): 326-345.‏
  • Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda. R&D Management, 36(3): 223-228.‏
  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The Future of Open Innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213-221.‏
  • Godin, B. (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6), 639-667.‏
  • Godin, B. (2012). “Pushes and Pulls”: A Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation Working Paper No. 12.
  • Godin, B. & Lane, J. P. (2013). “Pushes and Pulls”: A Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5): 621-654.‏
  • Inauen, M. & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2012). Fostering Radical Innovations with Open Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 212-231.
  • Karchegani, M. R., Sofian, S. & Amin, S. M. (2013). The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Innovation: A Review. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(1): 561-581.‏
  • Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (pp. 275-306). Washington: The National Academies Press.
  • Lazzarotti, V. & Manzini, R. (2009). Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4): 615-636.‏
  • Lord-Tarte, E. (2012). Innovation and the Development of the Canadian Wine Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Telfer School of Management University of Ottawa, Canada.
  • Marinova, D. & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of Innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 44-53). UK: Elsevier Science.
  • Marques, J. P. C. (2014). Closed versus Open Innovation: Evolution or Combination?. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3): 196-203.
  • Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3): 289-302.‏
  • Nicolov, M. & Badulescu, A. D. (2012). Different Types of Innovations Modeling. Annals of DAAAM for 2012 & Proceedings of the 23rd International DAAAM Symposium, 23(1): 1071-1074.
  • Oliveira, M. B. (2014). Technology and Basic Science: The Linear Model of Innovation. Scientiae Studia, 12(SPE), 129-146.‏
  • Robertson, P. L. & Arundel, A. (2013). The Role of R&D in Open and Closed Innovation. In 35th DRUID Celebration Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 17-19.
  • Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3): 221-239.
  • Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the Fifth-Generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, 11(1): 7-31.‏
  • Saviotti, P. P. (1996). Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • Tidd, J. (2006). A Review of Innovation Models, Discussion Paper 1. Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London.
  • Trott, P. & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why “Open Innovation” is Old Wine in New Bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4): 715-736.‏
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section AÇIK ERİŞİM POLİTİKASI
Authors

Aysun Kanbur

İbrahim A. H. Mohamed

Publication Date December 31, 2017
Acceptance Date January 5, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2017 Issue: ICOMEP 2017 ÖZEL SAYISI

Cite

APA Kanbur, A., & A. H. Mohamed, İ. (2017). WHETHER OPEN INNOVATION IS A BETTER CHOICE AS A MODEL OF INNOVATION FOR ORGANIZATIONS?. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(ICOMEP 2017 ÖZEL SAYISI), 123-135.