Ortodontide Stripping Uygulamalarına Genel Bakış

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 156 - 161, 01.05.2021

Oğuzhan Kale , Alev Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.789748

Abstract

İnterproksimal mine aşındırması, diğer adıyla stripping, daimi dişlerin interproksimal bölgelerindeki mine dokusunun, dişlere zarar verilmeksizin azaltılması ve anatomik olarak yeniden şekillendirilmesi işlemi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, çapraşık dişleri seviyelemek, Bolton diş boyutlarındaki uyumsuzluğu düzeltmek için daha fazla alan elde etmek ve düzeltilen diş diziliminin uzun süre korunması amacı ile uygulanmaktadır. Ortodontistler stripping yöntemini kullanarak, diş çekimlerinden kaçınabilmekte, ark boyunca bulunan yer fazlalıklarını ortadan kaldırabilmekte ve okluzal ilişkileri iyileştirebilmektedir. Ancak ortodontistler bunu çok dikkatli ve diş fizyolojisi ile ilgili prosedürleri göz önünde bulundurarak yapmalıdır. Tedavi süresince doğru bir yol izlenmeli ve kaldırılan mine miktarını ölçebilen araçlardan yararlanmalıdır. Başka bir deyişle, prosedür geri döndürülemez olduğu için oldukça tedbirli davranılmalıdır. Bu derlemenin amacı, minede yapılan stripping işlemini tanımlamak, çeşitli aşındırma teknikleri ve kullanılan materyaller ve strippingin kullanım alanları, avantajları ve dezavantajları hakkında bilgi vermektir.

Keywords

İnterproksimal aşındırma, Ortodonti, Stripping

Overview of Stripping Applications in Orthodontics

Abstract

Interproximal enamel reduction, also known as stripping, is defined as the process of reducing and anatomically reshaping the enamel tissue in the interproximal areas of permanent teeth without damaging the teeth. This approach is applied to level the crowded teeth, in order to obtain more space to correct the size mismatch due to Bolton difference and to preserve the corrected
dental alignment for a long time. By using the stripping method, orthodontists can avoid dental extraction to obtain the needed space, remove excess space along the dental arch and improve occlusal relations. However, this procedure should be approched very carefully keeping in mind the dental physiology. During the treatment, a correct course should be followed and they should be made use of the tools they can measure the amount of enamel removed. In other words, the procedure should be approched with caution as it is irreversible. The purpose of this review is to describe the tripping process and to give information about the various reduction techniques and materials used and the usage areas, advantages and disadvantages of stripping.

Keywords

Interproximal reduction, Orthodontic, Stripping

References

• Alexander RG, Sinclair PM, Goates LJ. 1986. Differential diagnosis and treatment planning for the adult nonsurgical orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod, 89: 95-112.
• Arends J, Christoffersen J. 1986. The nature of early carious lesions in enamel. J Dent Res, 65: 2-11.
• Ash MM, Ramfjord S. 1995. Occlusion. 4th ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, USA.
• Ballard ML. 1944. Asymmetry in tooth size, a factor in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 14: 67-70.
• Baysal A, Uysal T, Usumez S. 2007. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during different stripping procedures. Angle Orthod, 77: 478-482.
• Betteridge MA. 1981. The effects of interdental stripping on the labial segments evaluated one year out of retention. Br J Orthod, 8: 193-197.
• Bonetti GA, Pazzi E, Zanarini M, Marchionni S, Checchi L. 2014. The effect of Zinc-Carbonate Hydroxyapatite versus Fluoride on enamel surfaces after ınterproximal reduction. Scanning, 36: 356-361.
• Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ. 2007. Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod, 41(6): 315-320.
• Cretot M. 1991. Vieillissement du profil cutane chez l’adulte reste dente et equilibre. Orthod Fr, 62: 633-651.
• Dummer PMH, Harrison KA. 1982. In vitro plaque formation on commonly used dental materials. J Oral Rehabil, 9: 413-417.
• Fillion D. 1993a. Apport de la sculpture amelaire interproximale a l’orthodontie de l’adulte (2e partie). Revue Orthop Dento Faciale, 27: 189-214.
• Fillion D. 1993b. Apport de la sculpture amelaire interproximale a l’orthodontie de l’adulte (3e partie). Revue Orthop Dento Faciale, 27: 353-367.
• Florman M, Lobiondo PE, Partovi M. 2010. creating space with interproximal reduction. URL: www.dentalacademyofce.com (erişim tarihi: 27.08.2020).
• Frindel C. 2010. Clear thinking about interproximal stripping. J Dentofacial Anom Orthod, 13: 187-199.
• Germec D, Ugur-Taner T. 2008. Ortodontide interproksimal mine aşındırması. Turkish J Orthod, 21: 67-79.
• Gillings B, Buonocore M. 1961. An investigationof enamel thickness in human lower incisor teeth. J Dent Res, 40: 105-118.
• Harris EF, Hicks JD. 1998. A radiographic assessment of enamel thickness in human maxillary incisors. Arch Oral Biol, 43: 825-831.
• Hudson AL. 1956. A study of the effects of mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod, 42: 615-624.
• Jadhav S, Vattipelli S, Pavitra M. 2011. Interproximal enamel reduction in comprehensive orthodontic treatment: a review. Indian J Stomatol, 2: 245-248.
• Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ. 1992. Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102: 351-359.
• Kokich VO Jr, Kinzer GA. 2005. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: Canine substitution. J Esthet Restor Dent, 17: 5-10.
• Lapenaite E, Lopatiene K. 2014. Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija, 16: 19-24.
• Nassif N, Gholmieh M, Sfeir E, Mourad A. 2017. In vitro macro qualitative comparison of three enamel stripping procedures: What is the bestshape we can get? Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 10: 358-362.
• Peck H, Peck S. 1972. An index for assessing tooth shape deviations as applied to the mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod, 61: 384-401.
• Peng Y, Qian Z, Ting Z, Jie F, Xiaomei X, Li M. 2016. The effect of resin infiltration vs. flüoride varnish in enhancing enamel surface conditions after interproximal reduction. Dent Mater J, 35: 756-761.
• Philippe J. 1989. L’orthodontie de l’adulte. 1st ed. Paris, France.
• Pinheiro MLR. 2002. Interproximal Enamel Reduction. World J Orthod, 3: 223-232.
• Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Shwestka R, Bertzbach F. 1988. Plaque accumulation caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod, 94: 416-420.
• Rossouw PE, Tortorella A. 1992. Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102: 351-359.
• Rossouw PE, Tortorella A. 2003. Enamel reduction procedures in orthodontic treatment. J Can Dent Assoc, 69: 378-383.
• Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM. 1989. Air-rotor stripping and proximal sealants: an SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod, 23: 790-794.
• Sheridan JJ. 1985. Air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod, 19: 43-59.
• Sheridan JJ. 2008. Interviews John J. Sheridan on Air-Rotor Stripping. J Clin Orthod, 42: 381-388.
• Singh G, Juneja T. 2007. Methods of gaining space. In: Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed. Ajanta Offset and Packagings Ltd, New Delhi, India.
• Smith TM, Olejniczak AJ, Reid DJ, Ferrell RJ, Hublin JJ. 2006. Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape. Arch Oral Biol, 51: 974-995.
• Stroud JL, English J, Buschang PH. 1998. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod, 68: 141-146.
• Thodarson A, Zachrisson BU, Mjör IA. 1991. Remodeling of canines to the shape of lateral incisors by grinding: a long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100: 123-132.
• Tuverson DL. 1980. Anterior interocclusion relations. Part I. Am J Orthod, 78: 361-370.
• Twesme DA, Firestone AR, Heaven TJ, Feagin FF, Jacobson A. 1994. Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 105: 142-152.
• Van Der Linden FP. 1975. Aspects theoriques et pratiques de l’encombrement de la denture humaine. Revue Orthop Dento Faciale, 9: 329-352.
• Zach L, Cohen G. 1965. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 19: 515-530.
• Zachrisson BU, Minster L, Ogaard B, Birkhed D. 2011. Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: Caries risk in posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139: 90-98.
• Zachrisson BU, Nyöygaard L, Mobarak K. 2007. Dental health assessed more than 10 years after inter proximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod, 131: 162-169.
• Zachrisson BU. 1978. Improving orthodontic results ın cases with maxillary ıncisors missing. Am J Orthod, 73: 274-289.
• Zachrisson BU. 2004. Actual damage to teeth and periodontal tissues with mesiodistal enamel reduction ("stripping"). World J Orthod, 5: 178-183.
• Zhong M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Zellmann M, Zellmann S, Radlanski RJ. 2000. Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop, 61: 432-439.