Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Community Behavior and Health Literacy in Outbreaks

Year 2020, COVID-19Special Issue, 105 - 110, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.34084/bshr.719139

Abstract

In outbreaks, human behavioral responses have been shown to affect social outcomes. For emergency intervention, it is important to integrate approaches and interventions based on public science. The perception and implementation of interventions by the community is closely related to the level of health literacy of individuals. In this review, individual behavior models and effective factors were examined in outbreaks. During the epidemic, the effect of health literacy was mentioned in the success of crisis communication.

References

  • 1. World Health Organization What is a pandemic? World Health Organization https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020
  • 2. World Health Organization Risk communication World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/risk-communication/socialnet/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020
  • 3.Ilona Kickbusch, Jürgen M. Pelikan, Franklin Apfel & Agis D. Tsouros. Eds. Health literacy: the solid facts. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2013
  • 4. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER: Protection Motivation Theory. In Predicting health behaviour Edited by: Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2005:81-126.
  • 5. Champion VL, Skinner CS: The Health Belief Model. In Health behaviour and health education; theory, research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008:45-65.
  • 6. Witte K: Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In The handbook of communication and emotion Edited by: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK. New York: Academic Press; 1998:423-450.
  • 7. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ: The Precaution Adoption ProcessModel. InHealthbehaviourandhealtheducation;theory,research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008:123-147.
  • 8. De Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF: The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications:Ameta-analysis. ReviewofGeneralPsychology 2007, 11:258-285.
  • 9. Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G: Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology & Health 2001, 16:613-630.
  • 10. Markel H, Lipman HB, Navarro JA, Sloan A, Michalsen JR, Stren AM, Cetron MS: Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA 2007, 298:644-654.
  • 11. Bish A., Michie S., Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010 Doi:10.1348/135910710X485826
  • 12. Lau JT, Tsui H, Lau M, Yang X., SARS transmission, risk factors, and prevention in Hong Kong., Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;10(4):587-92.
  • 13. Leung et al. The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):662-73.
  • 14. Quah Ve Hin-Peng, Crisis Prevention and Management during SARS Outbreak, Singapore Emerging Infectious Diseases ,www.cdc.gov/eid ,Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2004.
  • 15. Tang, C.S.K., Wong C.Y. An outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome: Predictors of health behaviours and effect of community prevention measures in Hong Kong, China American Journal of Public Health 93 11 1887– 1888 2003.
  • 16. Lau, J. T., Yang, X., Tsui, H. Y., Pang, E. SARS related preventive and risk behaviours practised by Hong Kong–mainland China cross border travellers during the outbreak of the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 5812 988– 996 doi:10.1136/jech.2003.017483 2004.
  • 17. Lau, J. T., Yang, X., Tsui, H. Y., Pang, E., Kim, J. H. SARS preventive and risk behaviours of Hong Kong air travellers Epidemiology and Infection 132 727– 736doi:10.1017/S0950268804002225 2004.
  • 18. Brug, J. Aro, A. R., Oenema, A., Zwart, de, O., Richardus, J. H., Bishop, G. D. SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, The NetherlandsEmerging Infectious Disease 10 8 1486– 1489 doi:10.1007/s12529‐008‐9000‐x 2004.
  • 19. Petrie, K. J., Weinman, J. Perceptions of health and illness: Current research and applications Amsterdam Harwood 1997.
  • 20. Hagger, M., Orbell, S. A meta analytic review of the common‐sense model of illness representations Psychology and Health 18 141– 184 doi:10.1080/088704403100081321 2003.
  • 21. Eda Çetinkaya, Afet Durumlarında Sağlık Kuruluşları İçin İletişimin Önemi ve Yönetimi içinde editör: Hakan Altıntaş Acil ve Afet Durumlarında Sağlık Yönetimi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları Ankara 2013.
  • 22. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. CERC Manuel. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp. Accessed 5.4.2020.
  • 23. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlığın Geliştirilmesi Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Faktörleri Araştırması Yayın No 1103 Ankara 2018.
  • 24. Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU) European Journal of Public Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages 1053–1058.
  • 25. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y. et al. eds. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 2006.
  • 26. Orkan Okan, Kristine Sørensen, Melanie Messer. Coronavirus Needs: How to Become a Health Literate Society. nationalinterest.org https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/coronavirus-needs-how-become-health-literate-society-135382. Accessed 5.4.2020.
  • 27. Chia-Yi Hou. WHO warns of coronavirus 'infodemic' — an epidemic of too much information. https://thehill.com/. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/481387-were-in-an-infodemic-with-too-much-information Accessed 5.4.2020

Salgınlarda Toplum Davranışı ve Sağlık Okuryazarlığı

Year 2020, COVID-19Special Issue, 105 - 110, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.34084/bshr.719139

Abstract

Salgınlarda, insanların davranışsal tepkilerinin toplumsal sonuçları etkilediği görülmüştür. Acil müdahale için toplum bilimlerine dayalı yaklaşımları ve müdahaleleri entegre etmek önemlidir. Müdahalelerin toplum tarafından algılanması ve uygulanması ise bireylerin sağlık okuryazarlığı düzeyi ile yakından ilişkilidir. Bu derlemede salgınlarda birey davranış modelleri ve etkili faktörler incelenmiştir. Salgın esnasında uygulana kriz iletişiminin başarısında sağlık okuryazarlığının etkisine değinilmiştir.

References

  • 1. World Health Organization What is a pandemic? World Health Organization https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020
  • 2. World Health Organization Risk communication World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/risk-communication/socialnet/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020
  • 3.Ilona Kickbusch, Jürgen M. Pelikan, Franklin Apfel & Agis D. Tsouros. Eds. Health literacy: the solid facts. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2013
  • 4. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER: Protection Motivation Theory. In Predicting health behaviour Edited by: Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2005:81-126.
  • 5. Champion VL, Skinner CS: The Health Belief Model. In Health behaviour and health education; theory, research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008:45-65.
  • 6. Witte K: Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In The handbook of communication and emotion Edited by: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK. New York: Academic Press; 1998:423-450.
  • 7. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ: The Precaution Adoption ProcessModel. InHealthbehaviourandhealtheducation;theory,research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008:123-147.
  • 8. De Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF: The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications:Ameta-analysis. ReviewofGeneralPsychology 2007, 11:258-285.
  • 9. Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G: Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology & Health 2001, 16:613-630.
  • 10. Markel H, Lipman HB, Navarro JA, Sloan A, Michalsen JR, Stren AM, Cetron MS: Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA 2007, 298:644-654.
  • 11. Bish A., Michie S., Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010 Doi:10.1348/135910710X485826
  • 12. Lau JT, Tsui H, Lau M, Yang X., SARS transmission, risk factors, and prevention in Hong Kong., Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;10(4):587-92.
  • 13. Leung et al. The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):662-73.
  • 14. Quah Ve Hin-Peng, Crisis Prevention and Management during SARS Outbreak, Singapore Emerging Infectious Diseases ,www.cdc.gov/eid ,Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2004.
  • 15. Tang, C.S.K., Wong C.Y. An outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome: Predictors of health behaviours and effect of community prevention measures in Hong Kong, China American Journal of Public Health 93 11 1887– 1888 2003.
  • 16. Lau, J. T., Yang, X., Tsui, H. Y., Pang, E. SARS related preventive and risk behaviours practised by Hong Kong–mainland China cross border travellers during the outbreak of the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 5812 988– 996 doi:10.1136/jech.2003.017483 2004.
  • 17. Lau, J. T., Yang, X., Tsui, H. Y., Pang, E., Kim, J. H. SARS preventive and risk behaviours of Hong Kong air travellers Epidemiology and Infection 132 727– 736doi:10.1017/S0950268804002225 2004.
  • 18. Brug, J. Aro, A. R., Oenema, A., Zwart, de, O., Richardus, J. H., Bishop, G. D. SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, The NetherlandsEmerging Infectious Disease 10 8 1486– 1489 doi:10.1007/s12529‐008‐9000‐x 2004.
  • 19. Petrie, K. J., Weinman, J. Perceptions of health and illness: Current research and applications Amsterdam Harwood 1997.
  • 20. Hagger, M., Orbell, S. A meta analytic review of the common‐sense model of illness representations Psychology and Health 18 141– 184 doi:10.1080/088704403100081321 2003.
  • 21. Eda Çetinkaya, Afet Durumlarında Sağlık Kuruluşları İçin İletişimin Önemi ve Yönetimi içinde editör: Hakan Altıntaş Acil ve Afet Durumlarında Sağlık Yönetimi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları Ankara 2013.
  • 22. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. CERC Manuel. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp. Accessed 5.4.2020.
  • 23. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlığın Geliştirilmesi Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyi ve İlişkili Faktörleri Araştırması Yayın No 1103 Ankara 2018.
  • 24. Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU) European Journal of Public Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages 1053–1058.
  • 25. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y. et al. eds. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 2006.
  • 26. Orkan Okan, Kristine Sørensen, Melanie Messer. Coronavirus Needs: How to Become a Health Literate Society. nationalinterest.org https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/coronavirus-needs-how-become-health-literate-society-135382. Accessed 5.4.2020.
  • 27. Chia-Yi Hou. WHO warns of coronavirus 'infodemic' — an epidemic of too much information. https://thehill.com/. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/481387-were-in-an-infodemic-with-too-much-information Accessed 5.4.2020
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Public Health, Environmental Health
Journal Section Review
Authors

Seçil Özkan 0000-0003-1572-8777

Hakan Tüzün 0000-0002-6376-8979

Asiye Uğraş Dikmen 0000-0002-3204-7562

Mustafa Necmi İlhan 0000-0003-1367-6328

Publication Date April 30, 2020
Acceptance Date April 18, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 COVID-19Special Issue

Cite

AMA Özkan S, Tüzün H, Uğraş Dikmen A, İlhan MN. Salgınlarda Toplum Davranışı ve Sağlık Okuryazarlığı. J Biotechnol and Strategic Health Res. April 2020;4:105-110. doi:10.34084/bshr.719139

Cited By









COVID-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Bilişim Teknolojileri Bağımlılığı
Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.903612


  • Dergimiz Uluslararası hakemli bir dergi olup TÜRKİYE ATIF DİZİNİ, TürkMedline, CrossREF, ASOS index, Google Scholar, JournalTOCs, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index(ESJI), SOBIAD ve ISIindexing dizinlerinde taranmaktadır. TR Dizin(ULAKBİM), SCOPUS, DOAJ için başvurularımızın sonuçlanması beklenmektedir.