Öğretmen Adaylarının Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimleri: Yordayıcı Olarak Öz Yönetimli Öğrenme, Düşünme Stilleri, BİT Kullanım Durumu ve Demografik Değişkenlerin İncelenmesi

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 904 - 927, 15.10.2019

Mustafa Sarıtepeci , Cihan Orak

https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.555478

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerini etkileyen öz yönetimli öğrenme, düşünme stilleri ve demografik değişkenlerin yordayıcı etkisi incelenmiştir. İlişkisel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı bu araştırmada, çalışma grubunu 143 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri, öz yönetimli öğrenme ve düşünme stilleri ölçeği ile araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen kişisel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada bağımsız değişkenlerin bağımlı değişken üzerindeki yordayıcı etkisini araştırmak amacıyla çoklu doğrusal hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada yaşam boyu öğrenme ile ilgili 5 model oluşturulmuş olup bu modellerin tamamı anlamlıdır. Bundan dolayı araştırmada ele alınan tüm hipotezler kabul edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerini açıklayan en önemli model kişisel ve akademik gelişim için alınan kurs sayısının hiyerarşik regresyona dahil edildiği model 3’tür. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerinin en önemli yordayıcı değişkenleri kişisel ve akademik gelişim için alınan kurs sayısı, günlük eğitsel amaçlı internet kullanım süresi, öz yönetimli öğrenme, cinsiyet ve bölümdür.

Keywords

Yaşam boyu Öğrenme, öz yönetimli öğrenme, düşünme stilleri

Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Prospective Teachers: Investigation of Self-directed Learning, Thinking Styles, ICT Usage Status and Demographic Variables as Predictors

Abstract

This study has sought to examine the predicting effect of self-directed learning, thinking styles, ICT usage status and demographic variables on lifelong learning tendencies of prospective teachers. A total of 143 prospective teachers were recruited in this study. This study adopted a relational screening research model. Several instruments including lifelong learning tendencies, self-directed learning, thinking styles and a personal information form developed by the researchers were employed to obtain data. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was used to investigate into the predicting effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. Five models related to lifelong learning were formed in the study and it was found that all of them were statistically significant. In this sense, all hypotheses were accepted in the study. The findings clearly indicate that the most important model that explains the lifelong learning tendencies of prospective teachers is the model 3, in which the number of trainings for personal and professional development were included in hierarchical regression. Additionally, it was found that the most significant predictors of lifelong learning tendencies of prospective teachers were the number of trainings for personal and professional development, daily internet usage time for educational purposes, self-directed learning, gender and department.

Keywords

Lifelong learning, self-directed learning, thinking styles

References

• Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2003). A study on teacher candidates’perceived information literacy self-efficacy and perceived computer self-efficacy. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 24, 1-10.
• Aspin, D. N., & Chapman, J. D. (2000). Lifelong learning: concepts and conceptions. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 2-19.
• Ayaz, C. (2016). The Analysis of Life Long Learning Tendencies of Teachers in Terms of Some Veriables [In Turkish]. (Master), Bartın University, Institute of Education, Bartın.
• Bentley, T. (2012). Learning beyond the classroom: Education for a changing world: Routledge.
• Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective. Learning and instruction, 13(3), 327-347.
• Buluş, M. (2006). Assessment of Thinking Styles Inventory, Academic Achievement and Student Teacher’s Characteristics. Education & Science, 31(139).
• Buluş, M., Duru, E., Balkıs, M., & Duru, S. (2011). The Role of Learning Strategies and Individual Characteristics in Predicting Academic Achievement in Prospective Teachers. Education & Science, 36(161).
• Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice (1 ed.): Jossey-Bass.
• Cemaloğlu, N., & Şahin, D. E. (2007). A study of the teacher’s burnout level according to various variables [In Turkish]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 465-484.
• Cetin, S., & Cetin, F. (2017). Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Prospective Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(12), 1-8.
• Cropley, A. J., & Dave, R. H. (2014). Lifelong education and the training of teachers: developing a curriculum for teacher education on the basis of the principles of lifelong education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Day, C. (2002). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning: Routledge.
• Demircioğlu, Z. I., Öge, B., Fuçular, E. E., Çevik, T., Nazlıgül, M. D., & Özçelik, E. (2018). Reliability, Validity and Turkish Adaptation of Self-Directed Learning Scale (SDLS). International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(2), 235-247.
• Demirel, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ve bilgi okuryazarlığı özyeterlik algıları. Paper presented at the 10 th. International Educational Technology Conference.
• Diker-Coşkun, Y., & Demirel, M. (2012). Lifelong learning tendencies of university students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 42(42).
• Diker Coşkun, Y. (2009). Investigation of life long learning tendency of undergraduate students? In terms of some variables [In Turkish]. (Doctoral dissertation), Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institute.
• Dinçer, B. (2009). The investigation of teacher candidates? thinking style profiles in terms of various variables [In Turkish]. (Master's thesis), Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
• Dinevski, D., & Dinevski, I. V. (2004). The concepts of university lifelong learning provision in Europe. Transition Studies Review, 11(3), 227-235.
• Fischer, G., & Konomi, S. i. (2007). Innovative socio‐technical environments in support of distributed intelligence and lifelong learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 338-350.
• Gencel, İ. E. (2013). Prospective teachers’ perceptions towards lifelong learning competencies. Education & Science, 38(170).
• Gu, X., Gu, F., & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204-215.
• Güleç, İ., Çelik, S., & Demirhan, B. (2012). What is lifelong learning? An evaluation on definition and scope. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 34-48.
• Güneş, F. (2012). Skills and competencies set forth by bologna process in higher education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(1). doi:10.5961/jhes.2012.026
• Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2012). Factors affecting lifelong learning [In Turkish]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 309-325.
• Iwasiw, C. (1987). The role of the teacher in self-directed learning. Nurse Education Today, 7(5), 222-227.
• Karasar, N. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (26). Ankara: Nobel. Koç, N.(1994). Yabancılar İçin Dil Bilgisi.
• Karataş, K. (2017). Predicting Teacher Candidates’ Self-Directed Learning In Readiness Levels For Terms Of Metacognitive Awareness Levels [In Turkish]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(2), 451-465.
• Kılıç, Ç. (2014). Pre-servıce teachers’ perceptions towards life long learning. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(4), 79-87.
• Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New Yor: Association Press.
• Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (2004). New directions for lifelong learning using network technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 689-700.
• Lounsbury, J. W., Levy, J. J., Park, S.-H., Gibson, L. W., & Smith, R. (2009). An investigation of the construct validity of the personality trait of self-directed learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 411-418.
• Özgür, H. (2016). A study on ınformation literacy self-efficacies and lifelong learning competences of pre-service teachers [In Turkish]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1). doi:10.17860/efd.08241
• Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of F acebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754-769.
• Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for Thinking Styles. Educational leadership, 52(3), 36-40.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American psychologist, 52(7), 700.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG thinking styles inventory: Manual: Star Mountain Projects.
• Tas, S., Koc, M., Ozkan, H., & Yilmaz, E. (2009). Turkiye’de yetiskin ve yasam boyu egitimine yonelik lisans programi onerisi [An undergraduate program proposal for adult and lifelong education in Turkey]. Paper presented at the Ist International Congress of Educational Research.
• Tunca, N., Şahin, S. A., & Aydın, Ö. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2).
• Wain, K. (2000). The learning society: postmodern politics. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 36-53.
• Yazar, T., & Yaman, F. (2014). Investigating of life long learning tendency of teachers (The example of Diyarbakır). Kastomonu University Kastomonu Education Journal, 23(4), 1553-1566.
• Zhang, L.-F., & Sachs, J. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental self-government: A Hong Kong validity study. Psychological reports, 81(3), 915-928.
• Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of psychology, 134(5), 469-489.
• Zhoc, K. C., & Chen, G. (2016). Reliability and validity evidence for the Self-Directed Learning Scale (SDLS). Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 245-250.