Review
BibTex RIS Cite

YEŞİL YÖNETİM VE YENİLİK PERFORMANSI: BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Year 2023, , 1 - 15, 31.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1310661

Abstract

Bu makale, çevreye duyarlı yönetim uygulamaları ile firmaların inovasyon alanında başarılı olma dereceleri arasındaki bağlantıya ışık tutma çabasıyla önceki araştırmalara kapsamlı bir genel bakış sunmaktadır. Bu gözden geçirmenin amaçları (1) bu alanda yapılmış olan araştırmaları özetlemek; (2) mevcut bilgimizdeki boşlukları vurgulamak ve (3) gelecekte yapılması gereken araştırmalar için seçenekler sunar. Belirli dahil etme ve hariç tutma kriterlerine dayalı olarak bilinen veritabanlarından hakem değerlendirme sürecinden geçmiş yayınları seçtiğimiz sistematik inceleme adı verilen bir yaklaşım kullandık. Araştırmamıza göre, çevre dostu yönetim yöntemlerinin uygulanması ile artan yenilikçi performans seviyeleri arasında olumlu bir ilişki var. Ancak, bunun gerçekleştiği süreçler çok yönlüdür ve bağlama bağlıdır. Bu mekanizmalar, kuruluşun kültürü, düzenleyici ortam ve pazarın dinamikleri gibi unsurları içerir. Ek olarak, bu sonuçları daha fazla doğrulamak ve genişletmek için özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde daha fazla ampirik araştırmanın gerekli olduğu sonucuna vardık. Bu araştırmanın bulguları, hem akademik dünya hem de iş dünyası için önemli sonuçlara sahiptir ve sürdürülebilirliğin yönetim uygulamalarına dahil edilmesinin, genel organizasyonel performansı ve yaratıcılığı artırmak için stratejik bir kaldıraç işlevi görebileceğini göstermektedir.

References

  • Alfred, A. M., & Adam, R. F. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26.
  • Armstrong, C. E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33(6), 959-986.
  • Bernauer, T., Engel, S., Kammerer, D., & Sejas Nogareda, J. (2007). Explaining green innovation: Ten years after Porter's win-win proposition: How to study the effects of regulation on corporate environmental innovation?. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 39, 323-341.
  • Chang, T. W. (2020). Corporate sustainable development strategy: Effect of green shared vision on organization members’ behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2446.
  • Chang, T. W., Yeh, Y. L., & Li, H. X. (2020). How to shape an organization’s sustainable green management performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability, 12(21), 9198.
  • Chen, P. C., & Hung, S. W. (2014). Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(3), 347-363.
  • Dan, V. (2017). Empirical and non-empirical methods. Int Encyclopedia Commun Res Methods, 1, 1-3.
  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.
  • Farza, K., Ftiti, Z., Hlioui, Z., Louhichi, W., & Omri, A. (2021). Does it pay to go green? The environmental innovation effect on corporate financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113695.
  • Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Management Decision, 54(9), 2157-2187.
  • Holdsworth, L. (1997). Florida's environmental self-audit legislation: An incentive for the environmentally-conscientious business or an opportunity for the corporate polluter to suppress the truth. Stetson L. Rev., 27, 211.
  • Hong, J., Zheng, R., Deng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118377.
  • Huang, Y. C., & Jim Wu, Y. C. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: Evidence from high‐tech industries in Taiwan. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539-1567.
  • Jakšič, M., & Marinč, M. (2019). Relationship banking and information technology: The role of artificial intelligence and FinTech. Risk Management, 21, 1-18.
  • Li, Y. H., & Huang, J. W. (2017). The moderating role of relational bonding in green supply chain practices and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), 290-299.
  • Loknath, Y., & Azeem, B. A. (2017, October). Green management–concept and strategies. National Conference on Marketing and Sustainable Development, 13(14), 688-702.
  • Ma, Y., Hou, G., Yin, Q., Xin, B., & Pan, Y. (2018). The sources of green management innovation: Does internal efficiency demand pull or external knowledge supply push?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 582-590.
  • Molina‐Azorín, J. F., Claver‐Cortés, E., López‐Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100.
  • Haden, S., S. P., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: An exploratory analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041-1055.
  • Shu, C., Zhao, M., Liu, J., & Lindsay, W. (2020). Why firms go green and how green impacts financial and innovation performance differently: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 795-821.

GREEN MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Year 2023, , 1 - 15, 31.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1310661

Abstract

This article provides a thorough overview of the previous research in an effort to shed light on the connection that exists between environmentally conscious management practices and the degree to which firms succeed in the area of innovation. This review's goals are to (1) summarize the research that has already been conducted in this field; (2) highlight gaps in our present knowledge; and (3) offer options for research that should be conducted in the future. We used an approach called a systematic review, in which we selected publications that had been through a peer-review process from known databases based on certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to our research, there is a favorable association between the implementation of environmentally friendly management methods and increased levels of innovative performance. However, the processes through which this takes place are multi-faceted and depending on the context. These mechanisms include aspects such as the culture of the organization, the regulatory environment, and the dynamics of the market. In addition, we came to the conclusion that further empirical research is required, especially in developing nations, in order to further verify and expand on these results. The findings of this research have major ramifications for both the academic world and the business world, demonstrating that the incorporation of sustainability into management practices may operate as a strategic lever to boost overall organizational performance and creativity.

References

  • Alfred, A. M., & Adam, R. F. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26.
  • Armstrong, C. E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33(6), 959-986.
  • Bernauer, T., Engel, S., Kammerer, D., & Sejas Nogareda, J. (2007). Explaining green innovation: Ten years after Porter's win-win proposition: How to study the effects of regulation on corporate environmental innovation?. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 39, 323-341.
  • Chang, T. W. (2020). Corporate sustainable development strategy: Effect of green shared vision on organization members’ behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2446.
  • Chang, T. W., Yeh, Y. L., & Li, H. X. (2020). How to shape an organization’s sustainable green management performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability, 12(21), 9198.
  • Chen, P. C., & Hung, S. W. (2014). Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(3), 347-363.
  • Dan, V. (2017). Empirical and non-empirical methods. Int Encyclopedia Commun Res Methods, 1, 1-3.
  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.
  • Farza, K., Ftiti, Z., Hlioui, Z., Louhichi, W., & Omri, A. (2021). Does it pay to go green? The environmental innovation effect on corporate financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113695.
  • Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Management Decision, 54(9), 2157-2187.
  • Holdsworth, L. (1997). Florida's environmental self-audit legislation: An incentive for the environmentally-conscientious business or an opportunity for the corporate polluter to suppress the truth. Stetson L. Rev., 27, 211.
  • Hong, J., Zheng, R., Deng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118377.
  • Huang, Y. C., & Jim Wu, Y. C. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: Evidence from high‐tech industries in Taiwan. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539-1567.
  • Jakšič, M., & Marinč, M. (2019). Relationship banking and information technology: The role of artificial intelligence and FinTech. Risk Management, 21, 1-18.
  • Li, Y. H., & Huang, J. W. (2017). The moderating role of relational bonding in green supply chain practices and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), 290-299.
  • Loknath, Y., & Azeem, B. A. (2017, October). Green management–concept and strategies. National Conference on Marketing and Sustainable Development, 13(14), 688-702.
  • Ma, Y., Hou, G., Yin, Q., Xin, B., & Pan, Y. (2018). The sources of green management innovation: Does internal efficiency demand pull or external knowledge supply push?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 582-590.
  • Molina‐Azorín, J. F., Claver‐Cortés, E., López‐Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100.
  • Haden, S., S. P., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: An exploratory analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041-1055.
  • Shu, C., Zhao, M., Liu, J., & Lindsay, W. (2020). Why firms go green and how green impacts financial and innovation performance differently: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 795-821.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu 0000-0001-7138-2972

Kültigin Akçin 0000-0002-0202-8459

Early Pub Date December 31, 2023
Publication Date December 31, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Balcıoğlu, Y. S., & Akçin, K. (2023). GREEN MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1310661

23094


The Journal is committed to upholding the highest standarts of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpratices. Submitting researches by all authors mean that they assured their manuscripts are original and attest that the submitted papers represent their contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works. All submissions will be checked by iThenticate before being sent to reviewers according to the Journal's Zero Tolerance on the Plagiarism Policy