Hybrid Use of Business Process Management and Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in Supplier Selection in the Automotive Industry

Year 2022, Volume: 18 Issue: 4, 379 - 391, 26.12.2022

Mahmut Sayar

https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1126536

Abstract

The fact that businesses act with certain systematics while continuing their operations in constantly changing market conditions enables businesses to increase their internal communication activities, reduce their costs, and thus increase their productivity. Business Process Management studies allow businesses to gain these privileges that they should have. The supplier selection process is a complex problem involving many factors simultaneously and many different applications are used to solve these problems. The Analytical Hierarchy Process method is one of the most popular multi-criteria decision-making techniques. It mentioned in many studies in the literature and is known as an effective supplier selection method that uses qualitative and quantitative data together. In this study, the supplier selection operation of an important company in the automotive industry has been made more systematic by using a hybrid of Business Process Management, Analytical Hierarchy Process method and Responsibility Assignment Matrix. It is aimed to fill the gap in this area, guide effective supply chain management integration and supplier selection operation in automotive sector.

Keywords

Optimization, Supply Chain Management, Business Process Management (BPM), AHP, Production and Operations Management, Responsibility Assignment Matrix, Automotive Industry

References

• [1] Lee, H.L., Billington, C., 1992. Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Manage. Rev. 33, 65–73.
• [2] Özdemir, A.İ., 2004. Tedarik zinciri yönetiminin gelişimi, süreçleri ve yararları. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilim. Fakültesi Derg.
• [3] Sarı, K., Güngör, C., 2010. Tedarikçi yönetimli envanter yaklaşımının tedarik zinciri performansına etkileri. İTÜDERGİSİ/d 6.
• [4] Akman, G., Alkan, A., 2006. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bulanık AHP yöntemi kullanılarak tedarikçilerin performansının ölçülmesi: Otomotiv Yan Sanayiinde bir uygulama. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Derg. 5, 23–46.
• [5] Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process (new york: Mcgrawhill, 1980). MATH Google Sch.
• [6] Reijers, H.A., 2021. Business Process Management: The evolution of a discipline. Comput. Ind. 126, 103404.
• [7] Garimella, K., Lees, M., Williams, B., 2008. BPM basics for dummies. Wiley.
• [8] Cabanillas Macías, C., Resinas Arias de Reyna, M., Ruiz Cortés, A., 2011. Mixing RASCI matrices and BPMN together for responsibility management. Jornadas Cienc. E Ing. Serv. 2011, A Coruña, España.
• [9] Jeston, J., Nelis, J., 2014. Business process management: practical guidelines to successful implementations. Routledge.
• [10] Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M., Dizdar, E.N., 2005. Tedarikçi seçimi problemine analitik ağ süreci ile alternatif bir yaklaşım. Teknoloji 8.
• [11] Sonmez, M., 2006. Review and critique of supplier selection process and practices. Citeseer.
• [12] Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., 2001. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 29, 171–182.
• [13] Prahinski, C., Benton, W.C., 2004. Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance. J. Oper. Manag. 22, 39–62.
• [14] Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C., 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 56, 199–212.
• [15] Dickson, G.W., 1966. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J. Purch. 2, 5–17.
• [16] Lehmann, D.R., O’shaughnessy, J., 1974. Difference in Attribute Importance for Different Industrial Products: A bi-national study analyzes how industrial buyers evaluate different product categories. J. Mark. 38, 36–42.
• [17] Arbel, A., Orgler, Y.E., 1990. An application of the AHP to bank strategic planning: The mergers and acquisitions process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 27–37.
• [18] Beck, M.P., Lin, B.W., 1981. Selection of automated office systems: a case study. Omega 9, 169–176.
• [19] Nydick, R.L., Hill, R.P., 1992. Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 28, 31–36.
• [20] Verma, R., Pullman, M.E., 1998. An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega 26, 739–750.
• [21] De Boer, L., van der Wegen, L., Telgen, J., 1998. Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 4, 109–118..
• [22] Jayaraman, V., Srivastava, R., Benton, W.C., 1999. Supplier selection and order quantity allocation: a comprehensive model. J. Supply Chain Manag. 35, 50–58.
• [23] Görenler, A., 2009. Kesici takım tedarikçisi seçiminde analitik ağ sürecinin kullanımı. J. Aeronaut. Sp. Technol. 4, 99–110.
• [24] Perona, M., Saccani, N., 2004. Integration techniques in customer–supplier relationships: An empirical research in the Italian industry of household appliances. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 89, 189–205.
• [25] Erçetin, Ö.Z., Baykoç, Ö., 2004. Tedarikçi seçimi problemine karar teorisi destekli uzman sistem yaklaşımı. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimar. Fakültesi Derg. 19.
• [26] Duleba, S., Szádoczki, Z., 2022. Comparing aggregation methods in large-scale group AHP: Time for the shift to distance-based aggregation. Expert Syst. Appl. 196, 116667.
• [27] Saaty, T.L., 2001. Deriving the AHP 1-9 scale from first principles. ISAHP 2001 proceedings, Bern, Switz. 397–402.
• [28] Bernasconi, M., Choirat, C., Seri, R., 2014. Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232, 584–592.
• [29] Saaty, T.L., 1994. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces (Providence). 24, 19–43.
• [30] Özyörük, B., Özcan, E.C., 2008. Analitik hiyerarşi sürecinin tedarikçi seçiminde uygulanmasi: otomotiv sektöründen bir örnek. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilim. Fakültesi Derg. 13, 133–144.