Influence of Edible Coating and Process Conditions on The Osmotic Dehydration of Carrot

Year 2023, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 107 - 112, 29.06.2023

Osman Yağız Turan , Ebru Fıratlıgil

Abstract

Osmotic dehydration is a pre-treatment used for partial removal of water from food materials and inhibits the loss of sensory and nutritional attributes of dried food. The main drawback of osmotic dehydration is the solutes uptake of food material from the hypertonic solution. Optimization of process parameters is critical to achieve desired levels of dehydration and solid uptake. To minimize the solid gain, food materials are coated with edible films prior to drying. In this study, the effects of solution temperature (25°C, 35°C and 45°C), sugar solution concentration (40%, 50% and 60%) and edible film coatings on solid gain (SG) and water loss (WL) of osmotically dehydrated carrot slices were investigated. Solid gain and water loss rates after osmotic dehydration were determined and dehydration efficiency index values were calculated. It is observed that WL and SG values increase with the increasing temperature and solution concentration. The solid permeability of cornstarch coating was lower compared to plum coated and non-coated samples. Weight loss of dehydrated carrot slices coated with cornstarch were higher than the non-coated ones. Cornstarch based edible coatings did not have a negative effect on water loss while plum based edible coatings caused the water loss to decrease. Optimum mass transfer rates for water and solids were achieved at 25°C with a solution concentration of 60%. Highest dehydration efficiencies recorded were of starch-coated samples at all process parameters. Plum coating showed a slight improvement against non-coated samples at optimum process parameters.

Keywords

Dehydration effiency, edible coating, osmotic dehydration, solid gain, water loss

References

• References Kowalski, S.J., Szadzińska, J., Łechtańska, J., 2013. Non-stationary drying of carrot: Effect on product quality. Journal of Food Engineering., 118(4): 393-399.
• Silva, K.S., Fernandes, M.A., Mauro, M.A., 2014. Effect of calcium on the osmotic dehydration kinetics and quality of pineapple. Journal of Food Engineering, 134: 37–44.
• Liu, B. and Peng, B.Z., 2017. Modelling and optimization of process parameters for strawberry osmotic dehydration using central composite rotatable design. Journal of Food Quality, 2017.
• Muhamad, N. and Basri, M.S.N., 2019. Effect of osmotic dehydration on physicochemical characteristics of dried Manis Terengganu melon. Bioscience Research, 16(1): 182-191.
• Nowacka, M., Tylewicz, U., Laghi, L., Dalla Rosa, M., Witrowa- Rajchert, D., 2014. Effect of ultrasound treatment on the water state in kiwifruit during osmotic dehydration. Food Chemistry 144, 18–25.
• Ganjloo, A. and Bimakr, M. 2015. Influence of sucrose solution concentration and temperature on mass exchange during osmotic dehydration of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) cubes. International Food Research Journal, 22(2): 807-811.
• Derossi, A., Severini, C., Del Mastro, A., De Pilli, T. 2015. Study and optimization of osmotic dehydration of cherry tomatoes in complex solution by response surface methodology and desirability approach. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 60(2): 641-648.
• Mitrakas, G.E., Koutsoumanis, K.P., Lazarides, H.N., 2008. Impact of edible coating with or without anti-microbial agent on microbial growth during osmotic dehydration and refrigerated storage of a model plant material, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies., 9(4): 550-555.
• Lazarides, H.N., Mitrakas, G.E., Matsos, K.I., 2007. Edible coating and counter-current product/solution contacting: A novel approach to monitoring solids uptake during osmotic dehydration of a model food system. Journal of Food Engineering, 82(2): 171-177.
• Matuska, M., Lenart, A., Lazarides, H.N., 2006. On the use of edible coatings to monitor osmotic dehydration kinetics for minimal solids uptake. Journal of Food Engineering 72, 85–91.
• Sanchez-Ortega, I., Garcia-Almendarez, B.E., Santos-Lopez, E.M., Reyes-Gonzalez, L.R., Regalado, C., 2016. Characterization and antimicrobial effect of starch-based edible coating suspensions. Food Hydrocoll., 52, 906–913.
• Elsabee, M.Z., Abdou, E.S., 2013. Chitosan based edible films and coatings: A review. Materials Science and Engineering C, 33, 1819– 1841.
• Taghizadeh, M., Fathi, M., Sajjadi, A.L., 2016. Effect of coating concentration and combined osmotic and hot-air dehydration on some physicochemical, textural, and sensory properties of apple slabs. Acta Alimentaria, 45(1): 119-128.
• Rodriguez, A., Soteras, M., Campanone, L. 2021. Review: Effect of the combined application of edible coatings and osmotic dehydration on the performance of the process and the quality of pear cubes. International Journal of Food Science and Tech., 56(12): 6474-6483.
• AOAC, 2002. Official Methods of Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 934.06. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Rockville, MD, USA. [16]. Azoubel, P.M., Murr, F.E.X., 2004. Mass transfer kinetics of osmotic dehydration of cherry tomato. Journal of Food Engineering, 61, 291–295.
• Jalaee, F., Fazeli, A., Fatemian, H., Tavakolipour, H., 2011. Mass transfer coefficient and the characteristics of coated apples in osmotic dehydrating. Food and Bioproducts Processing,. 89, 367–374.
• Jain, S.K., Verma, R.C., Murdia, L.K., Jain, H.K., Sharma, G.P., 2011. Optimization of process parameters for osmotic dehydration of papaya cubes. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48, 211–217.
• Lazarides, H.N., Katsanidis, E., Nickolaidis, A., 1995. Mass transfer kinetics during osmotic preconcentration aiming at minimal solid uptake. Journal of Food Engineering, 25: 151–166.
• Torreggiani, D., 1993. Osmotic dehydration in fruit and vegetable processing. Food Research International, 26: 59–68.
• Biswal, R.N., Bozorgmehr, K., Tompkins, F.D., Liu, X., 1991. Osmotic concentration of green beans prior to freezing. Journal of Food Science, 56, 1008–1012.
• Sacchetti, G., Gianotti, A., Dalla Rosa, M., 2001. Sucrose-salt combined effects on mass transfer kinetics and product acceptability. Study on apple osmotic treatments. Journal of Food Engineering, 49, 163–173.
• Garcia, M., Diaz, R., Martinez, Y., Casariego, A., 2010. Effects of chitosan coating on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of papaya. Food Research International, 43, 1656–1660.
• Lazarides, H.N., 2001. Reasons and Possibilities to Control Solids Uptake during Osmotic Treatment of Fruits an Vegetables, in: Pedro, F., Amparo, C., Jose Manuel, B., Walter E. L., S., Diana, B. (Eds.), Osmotic Dehydration and Vacuum Impregnation: Applications in Food Industries. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
• Jokic, A., Zavargo, Z., Gyura, J., Prodanic, B., 2008. Possibilities to control solid uptake during osmotic dehydration of sugar beet, in: Cantor, J.M. (Ed.), Progress in Food Engineering Research and Development. Nova Publishers, pp. 243–261.
• Lazarides, H.N., Gekas, V., Mavroudis, N., 1997. Apparent mass diffusivities in fruit and vegetable tissues undergoing osmotic processing. Journal of Food Engineering 31, 315–324.
• Raoult-Wack, A.L., 1994. Recent advances in the osmotic dehydration of foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology 5, 255– 260.