SIĞIR PNÖMONİK AKCİĞERLERİNDEN İZOLE EDİLEN PSEUDOMONAS AERUGİNOSA SUŞLARININ ANTİBİYOTİK DUYARLILIKLARININ BELİRLENMESİ

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 31.12.2015

Abdurrahman Gürbüz Perihan Akbaş

Abstract

In this study total of
66 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
that were isolated form pneumonic lung samples collected in the Kars
Municipality Slaughterhouse. Using Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method, isolated
strains were tested against tetracycline, ampicillin, gentamicin,
amoxicillin/clavulanik acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, vancomysin and
chloramphenicol antibiotic discs. The results of the antibiogram showed that P. aeruginosa strains were resistant
100% to ampicillin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and
chloramphenicol, 64% to vancomysin, 6% to amoxicillin/clavulanik acid, and 9%
to tetracycline. Susceptibility to tetracycline, amoxicillin/clavulanik acid
and vancomysin were determined to be 91%, 94% and 36%, respectively. In the
light of the results, tetracycline and amoxicillin/clavulanik acid were
suggested to in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, cattle, pneumonia, antibiotic susceptibility, lung

References

• 1. Arda M, Minbay A, Leloğlu N, kahraman M, Akay Ö, Ilgaz A, İzgür M, Diker KS: Özel Mikrobiyoloji, Epidemiyoloji, bakteriyel ve Mikotik İnfeksiyonlar. Medisan Yayın serisi, No:26, 4.Baskı, Ankara, 1997.
• 2. Bilgehan H: Özelo Bakteriyoloji ve Bakteri Enfeksiyonları. Fakülteler kitabevi, Barış yayınları, 10.Baskı, İzmir, 2000.
• 3. Erdem B: Pseudomonaslar. Temel ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji. Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara, 1999.
• 4. Kang C, Kim HS, park W, Choe YJ: Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: Risk factors for mortality and influence of delayed receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcame. Clinic of Infectious Disease, 37:754-751, 2003.
• 5. Koneman E, Stephan DA, William MJ, Schreckenberger PC, Winn CW Jr: The nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli. Konaman’s colour Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology 6th Ed. Philadelphia, lippincott, 303-391, 2006.
• 6. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 145:225-230, 1966.
• 7. CLSI : Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 17th informational supplement. Approved Standard MS100-S17. Vol.27, No.1, Wayne, PA, USA, 2007.
• 8. Kamel GM, Ezz elden NA, El-Mishad MY, Ezzat RF: Subceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Againts Antimicrobial Agents and Some Plant Extracts with Focus on its Prevalance in Different Sources. Global Veterinaria 6(1):61-72, 2011.
• 9. Hosain MG, Saha S, Rahman MM, Singha JK, Mamun AA: Isolation, Identification and Antibiogram Study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Cattle in Bangladesh. J Vet Adv 3(7): 180-185, 2013.
• 10. Yılmaz S: Çeşitli Klinik örneklerden izole edilen Pseudomonas aeruginosa suşlarının antimikrobiyel ajanlara duyarlılığı. Yüzüncüyıl Üniv. Sağ. Bil. Enst. Yüksek Lisans tezi, Van, 1999.
• 11. Amosun EA, Olatoye IO, Adetosoye AI: Antimicrobial Resistance Escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from the Milk of Dairy Cows in Three Nigerian Cities. Nigerian Veterinary Journal, 33(4), 617-623, 2012.
• 12. Keskin O, Tel OY, Arserim NB: Bir Sığırcılık İşletmesinde Çoklu Antibiyotik Dirençli Pseudomonas aeruginosa Epidemisi.Dicle Üniv. Vet.Fak. Derg. 1(5): 30-33, 2012.
• 13. Hariharan HJ, McPhee L, Heaney S, Bryenton J: Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of clinical isolated of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Canadian veterinary Journal. 36(3): 166-168, 1995.
• 14. Katarzyna W, Antoni J, Zbigniew A, Kazimierz B: Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to antibiotics and chemotherapy. Medycyna Wet. 55(12):812-817, 1999.
• 15. VLA antimicrobial sensitivity report 2003 : Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs , 2004 . www.defra.gov.uk