Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 15 - 42, 30.06.2020

Barış Ateş

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Soğuk Savaş döneminin sona ermesi, güvenlik politikalarından ekonomiye, toplumsal yapıdan teknolojiye kadar birçok farklı alanda değişime yol açmıştır. Bu kadar geniş bir alanda yaşanan değişim dalgası ordular üzerinde de bir baskı oluşturmuş ve birçok ülke silahlı kuvvetlerini ortaya çıkan yeni tehditlere ve görev türlerine göre yeniden tasarlamıştır. Özellikle ABD ve Batı Avrupa’da başlayan ve NATO etkisiyle yayılan askeri değişimin sonucunda ortaya çıkan ürünün ülkeden ülkeye farklılıklar gösterdiği görülmektedir. Ancak bu alanda Türkçe literatürde çalışma yok denecek kadar azdır. Bu makale söz konusu dönemde ortaya çıkan ve halen devam eden askeri değişim hareketlerini farklı disiplinler tarafından ortaya konulan modeller üzerinden anlamaya ve açıklamaya yönelik bir çalışmadır.

Keywords

askeri değişim - askeri dönüşüm postmodern ordu seferi ordu Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönem

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

  • Adams, T. K. (2006). The Army After Next: The First Postindustrial Army, Westport: Praeger Security International.
  • Adamsky, D. (2010). The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on The Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, The US, and Israel, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Aldis, A. (2005). Defence Transformation in Europe Today: Implications for the Armed Forces, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.103-111), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Ateş, B. (2014). Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemde Askeri Değişim: NATO Orduları ve Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Avant, D. D. (1994). Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Baylis, J. (2001). International and Global Security in the Post-Cold War Era, John Baylis ve Steve Smith (ed.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, içinde (s.253-276), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beck, U. (2000). What is Globalization?, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Biddle, S. D. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Binnendijk, H., Kugler, R. L. (2001). Managing Change: Capability, Adaptability, and Transformation, Defense Horizons, Washington: National Defense University.
  • Booth, B., Kestnbaum, M., Segal, D.R. (2001). Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern?, Armed Forces & Society, 27 (3), 319-342.
  • Burk, J. (1993). Morris Janowitz and the Origins of Sociological Research on Armed Forces and Society, Armed Forces & Society, 19 (2), 167-185.
  • Cavelty, M.D., Mauer, V. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, Londra: Routledge.
  • Cohen, E. A. (2004). Change and Transformation in Military Affairs, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 27 (3), 395-407.
  • Dandeker, C. (1994). New Times for the Military: Some Sociological Remarks on the Changing Role and Structure of the Armed Forces of the Advanced Societies, The British Journal of Sociology, 45 (4), 637-654.
  • Dyson, T. (2005). German Military Reform 1998_2004: Leadership and the Triumph of Domestic Constraint over International Opportunity, European Security, 14 (3), 361-386.
  • Edmunds, T. (2005). A New Security Environment? The Evolution of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Europe, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.9-18), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Farrell, T. (2002). World Culture and the Irish Army, 1922–1942, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.69-90), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Farrell, T., Terriff, T. (2002). The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology, Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Forster, A. (2006). Armed Forces and Society in Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gabriel, R. A., Savage, P.L. (1978). Crisis in Command: Mismanagement in the Army, New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Goldman, E. O. (2002). The Spread of Western Military Models to Ottoman Turkey and Meiji Japan, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology, içinde (s.41-67), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Grissom, A. (2006). The Future of Military Innovation Studies, Journal of Strategic Studies, 29 (5), 905-934.
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2014). Emergent Postmodern US Military Culture, Armed Forces & Society, 40 (1), 118-145.
  • Jelusic, L. (2006). Conversion of the Military: Resource-Reuse Perspective after the End of the Cold War, G. Caforio (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of the Military içinde (s.345-359), New York: Springer.
  • Karaosmanoğlu, A. L. (2012). NATO’nun Dönüşümü, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kegley Jr, C. W., Wittkopf, E. R. (1999). World Politics: Trend and Transformation, Seventh Edition, New York: Bedford/St.Martin’s.
  • Kier, E. (1995). Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars, International Security, 19 (4), 65-93.
  • King, A. (2011). The Transformation of Europe’s Armed Forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Latham, A. (2002). Warfare Transformed: A Braudelian Perspective on the ‘Revolution in Military Affairs, European Journal of International Relations, 8 (2), 231-266.
  • Malešic, M. (2005). Introduction: The Challenge of Defence Transformation in Europe, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.1-8), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Marten-Zisk, K. (1993). Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955–1991, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Moskos, C. (2005). Military Systems in the 21st Century: Changes and Continuities, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.19-26), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Moskos, C., Williams, J.A., Segal, D.R. (2000). The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War, Oxford: Oxford University Press. NATO. (2015). AAP-06 Glossary of Terms and Definitions, Edition 2015, Brussels, NSO.
  • Petersson, M. (2011). Defense Transformation and Legitimacy in Scandinavia after the Cold War: Theoretical and Practical Implications, Armed Forces&Society, 37 (4), 701-724.
  • Pion-Berlin, D. (2008). The Challenge to Reform Defense, T. Bruneau, H. Trinkunas (ed.), Global Politics of Defense Reform içinde (s.271-284), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Posen, B. R. (1984). The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain and Germany between the World Wars, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Roberts, A. (1976). Nations in Arms: The Theory and Practice of Territorial Defense, New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Rosen, S. P. (1991). Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Sinterniklaas, R. (2018). Military Innovation: Cutting the Gordian Knot, Research Paper:116, Breda: Publications Faculty of Military Sciences Netherlands Defence Academy.
  • Sloan, E. (2008). Military Transformation and Modern Warfare A Reference Handbook, Westport: Praeger Security International.
  • Terriff, T. (2002). U.S. Ideas and Military Change in NATO, 1989–1994, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.91-116), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Terriff, T., Farrell, T. (2002). Military Change in the New Millennium, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.265-277), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • The Military Balance. (2015). Country comparisons, 115 (1), Londra: Routledge.
  • Williams, C., Gilroy C. (2006). The Transformation of Personnel Policies, Defence Studies, 6 (1), 97-121.
  • Williams, J.A. (2000). The Postmodern Military Reconsidered, C. Moskos, J.A. Williams, D.R. Segal (ed.), The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War içinde (s.265-278), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 15 - 42, 30.06.2020

Barış Ateş

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Project Number

-

References

  • Adams, T. K. (2006). The Army After Next: The First Postindustrial Army, Westport: Praeger Security International.
  • Adamsky, D. (2010). The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on The Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, The US, and Israel, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Aldis, A. (2005). Defence Transformation in Europe Today: Implications for the Armed Forces, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.103-111), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Ateş, B. (2014). Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemde Askeri Değişim: NATO Orduları ve Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Avant, D. D. (1994). Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Baylis, J. (2001). International and Global Security in the Post-Cold War Era, John Baylis ve Steve Smith (ed.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, içinde (s.253-276), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beck, U. (2000). What is Globalization?, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Biddle, S. D. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Binnendijk, H., Kugler, R. L. (2001). Managing Change: Capability, Adaptability, and Transformation, Defense Horizons, Washington: National Defense University.
  • Booth, B., Kestnbaum, M., Segal, D.R. (2001). Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern?, Armed Forces & Society, 27 (3), 319-342.
  • Burk, J. (1993). Morris Janowitz and the Origins of Sociological Research on Armed Forces and Society, Armed Forces & Society, 19 (2), 167-185.
  • Cavelty, M.D., Mauer, V. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, Londra: Routledge.
  • Cohen, E. A. (2004). Change and Transformation in Military Affairs, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 27 (3), 395-407.
  • Dandeker, C. (1994). New Times for the Military: Some Sociological Remarks on the Changing Role and Structure of the Armed Forces of the Advanced Societies, The British Journal of Sociology, 45 (4), 637-654.
  • Dyson, T. (2005). German Military Reform 1998_2004: Leadership and the Triumph of Domestic Constraint over International Opportunity, European Security, 14 (3), 361-386.
  • Edmunds, T. (2005). A New Security Environment? The Evolution of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Europe, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.9-18), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Farrell, T. (2002). World Culture and the Irish Army, 1922–1942, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.69-90), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Farrell, T., Terriff, T. (2002). The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology, Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Forster, A. (2006). Armed Forces and Society in Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gabriel, R. A., Savage, P.L. (1978). Crisis in Command: Mismanagement in the Army, New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Goldman, E. O. (2002). The Spread of Western Military Models to Ottoman Turkey and Meiji Japan, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology, içinde (s.41-67), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Grissom, A. (2006). The Future of Military Innovation Studies, Journal of Strategic Studies, 29 (5), 905-934.
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2014). Emergent Postmodern US Military Culture, Armed Forces & Society, 40 (1), 118-145.
  • Jelusic, L. (2006). Conversion of the Military: Resource-Reuse Perspective after the End of the Cold War, G. Caforio (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of the Military içinde (s.345-359), New York: Springer.
  • Karaosmanoğlu, A. L. (2012). NATO’nun Dönüşümü, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kegley Jr, C. W., Wittkopf, E. R. (1999). World Politics: Trend and Transformation, Seventh Edition, New York: Bedford/St.Martin’s.
  • Kier, E. (1995). Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars, International Security, 19 (4), 65-93.
  • King, A. (2011). The Transformation of Europe’s Armed Forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Latham, A. (2002). Warfare Transformed: A Braudelian Perspective on the ‘Revolution in Military Affairs, European Journal of International Relations, 8 (2), 231-266.
  • Malešic, M. (2005). Introduction: The Challenge of Defence Transformation in Europe, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.1-8), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Marten-Zisk, K. (1993). Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955–1991, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Moskos, C. (2005). Military Systems in the 21st Century: Changes and Continuities, T. Edmunds ve M. Malešič (ed.), Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles içinde (s.19-26), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Moskos, C., Williams, J.A., Segal, D.R. (2000). The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War, Oxford: Oxford University Press. NATO. (2015). AAP-06 Glossary of Terms and Definitions, Edition 2015, Brussels, NSO.
  • Petersson, M. (2011). Defense Transformation and Legitimacy in Scandinavia after the Cold War: Theoretical and Practical Implications, Armed Forces&Society, 37 (4), 701-724.
  • Pion-Berlin, D. (2008). The Challenge to Reform Defense, T. Bruneau, H. Trinkunas (ed.), Global Politics of Defense Reform içinde (s.271-284), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Posen, B. R. (1984). The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain and Germany between the World Wars, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Roberts, A. (1976). Nations in Arms: The Theory and Practice of Territorial Defense, New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Rosen, S. P. (1991). Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Sinterniklaas, R. (2018). Military Innovation: Cutting the Gordian Knot, Research Paper:116, Breda: Publications Faculty of Military Sciences Netherlands Defence Academy.
  • Sloan, E. (2008). Military Transformation and Modern Warfare A Reference Handbook, Westport: Praeger Security International.
  • Terriff, T. (2002). U.S. Ideas and Military Change in NATO, 1989–1994, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.91-116), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Terriff, T., Farrell, T. (2002). Military Change in the New Millennium, T. Farrell, T. Terriff (ed.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology içinde (s.265-277), Londra: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • The Military Balance. (2015). Country comparisons, 115 (1), Londra: Routledge.
  • Williams, C., Gilroy C. (2006). The Transformation of Personnel Policies, Defence Studies, 6 (1), 97-121.
  • Williams, J.A. (2000). The Postmodern Military Reconsidered, C. Moskos, J.A. Williams, D.R. Segal (ed.), The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War içinde (s.265-278), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects International Relations, Behaviour-Personality Assessment in Psychology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Barış Ateş 0000-0001-8548-6924

Project Number -
Publication Date June 30, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ateş, B. (2020). ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137
AMA Ateş B. ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. June 2020;10(1):15-42. doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137
Chicago Ateş, Barış. “ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10, no. 1 (June 2020): 15-42. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137.
EndNote Ateş B (June 1, 2020) ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10 1 15–42.
IEEE B. Ateş, “ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–42, 2020, doi: 10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137.
ISNAD Ateş, Barış. “ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10/1 (June 2020), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137.
JAMA Ateş B. ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;10:15–42.
MLA Ateş, Barış. “ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, pp. 15-42, doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.673137.
Vancouver Ateş B. ASKERİ DEĞİŞİM: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DÖNEM ÜZERİNE İNCELEME. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;10(1):15-42.

Cited By

Doğu Cephesinde Yeni Bir Şey Yok: Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı Sonrası Avrupa’da Savaş Hazırlıkları
Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1365782
Ordular Sadece Savaşır mı? Yeni Görevler Bağlamında Türkiye, ABD ve Rusya Orduları
Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1369794
Küreselleşmenin Uluslararası İlişkilerde Yarattığı Süreklilik ve Değişim Tartışması
Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1287785