Comparison of the Effect of Denture Cleansers on Long-Term Water Sorption and Solubility of Polyetheretherketone with other Denture Base Materials

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 672 - 677, 28.09.2022

Fatih Demirci , Abdulsamet Tanık

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1011897

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: In this in vitro study, the effect of three denture cleansers (DCs) after immersion in a chemical solution applied to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and other denture base materials (DBMs) on long-term water sorption and solubility was compared.

Methods: Disk-shaped specimens (50±1.0-mm diameter and 0.5±0.1-mm thickness) were prepared from four DBMs (n=48). All specimens were randomly subdivided into four storage media groups (n=12): Corega tablet (CT), Protefix tablet (PT), 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution (SH), and control (distilled water, DW). Storage media were renewed thrice a day for 120 days and simulated for 1-year use of overnight immersion. Water sorption and solubility (µg/mm3) of DBMs before and after immersion in storage media were examined and obtained data were statistically analyzed using a multivariate analysis of variance, followed by multiple comparisons by a posthoc Tukey’s test (p <0.05).

Results: From statistical analysis, the effect of different DCs on the water sorption and solubility of DBMs revealed a statistical difference (p<0.05). The PEEK group exhibited a statistical difference in mean water sorption values among all cleanser groups (p<0.05). For the PEEK group, a statistical difference was observed in the DW group among SH and CT groups in terms of the mean solubility values (p<0.05), while a statistically significant difference was not observed in the PT group among SH and CT groups (p> 0.05).

Conclusion: DCs affect PEEK and other DBMs in terms of water sorption and solubility in the long-term follow-up.

Keywords

Denture base material, denture cleanser, PEEK, Solubility, water sorption

Supporting Institution

No

Project Number

no

Thanks

no

References

• [1] Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118(3):273-280.
• [2] Zitzmann NU, Hagmann E, Weiger R. What is the prevalence of various types of prosthetic dental restorations in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(3):20-33.
• [3] Ozyilmaz OY, Kara O, Akin C. Evaluation of various denture cleansers on color stability and surface topography of polyetherketoneketone, polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylate. Microsc Res Tech 2021;84(1):3–11.
• [4] Zafar MS. Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12(10):2299.
• [5] Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(1): 65–71.
• [6] Vojdani M, Giti R. Polyamide as a denture base material: A literature review. J Dent Shiraz 2015;16(1):1-9.
• [7] Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, Arregui I, Guisasola C, Ruiz E, Maestro A. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(8):823-835.
• [8] Foti B, Tavitian P, Tosello A, Bonfil JJ, Franquin JC. Polymetallism and osseointegration in oral implantology: Pilot study on primate. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(6):495-502.
• [9] Schwitalla A, Muller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(6):743-749.
• [10] Wiesli MG, Ozcan M. High-performance polymers and their potential application as medical and oral implant materials: a review. Implant Dent 2015;24(4):448-457.
• [11] Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Muller WD. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater 2015;31(11):1377-1384.
• [12] Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):353-361.
• [13] Machado AL, Breeding LC, Vergani CE, da Cruz Perez LE. Hardness and surface roughness of reline and denture base acrylic resins after repeated disinfection procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(2):115-122.
• [14] Alam M, Jagger R, Vowles R, Moran J. Comparative stain removal properties of four commercially available denture cleaning products: an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg 2011;9(1):37-42.
• [15] Felipucci DN, Davi LR, Paranhos HF, Bezzon OL, Silva RF, Pagnano VO. Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture. Braz Dent J 2011;22(5):392-397.
• [16] Hong G, Murata H, Li Y, Sadamori S, Hamada T. Influence of denture cleansers on the color stability of three types of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(3):205-213.
• [17] Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Löffler P, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(3):321-328.
• [18] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Dentistry-Base polymers-Part 1: Denture base polymers. ISO 20795-1:2013. Available from: URL:https://www.iso.org/ standard/62277.html. September 12, 2021
• [19] Council on dental materials and devices. Revised American dental association specification no. 12 for denture base polymers. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;90(2), 451-458.
• [20] Kazanji MN, Watkinson AC. Soft lining materials: their absorption of, and solubility in, artificial saliva. Br Dent J 1988;165(3):91-94.
• [21] Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13(4):258-269.
• [22] Köroğlu A, Şahin O, Dede DÖ, Deniz ŞT, Karacan Sever N, Özkan S. Efficacy of denture cleaners on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adherence of sealant agent coupled denture base materials. Dent Mater J 2016;35(5):810-816.
• [23] Kurahashi K, Matsuda T, Ishida Y, Ichikawa T. Effect of polishing protocols on the surface roughness of polyetheretherketone. J Oral Sci 2020;62(1):40-42.
• [24] Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Effect of different cleaning methods of polyetheretherketone on surface roughness and surface free energy properties. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016;14(3):248-255.
• [25] Durkan R, Ayaz EA, Bagis B, Gurbuz A, Ozturk N, Korkmaz FM. Comparative effects of denture cleansers on physical properties of polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate base polymers. Dent Mater J 2013;32(3):367-375.
• [26] Song SY, Kim KS, Lee JY, Shin SW. Physical properties and color stability of injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11(1):32-40.
• [27] Nguyen LG, Kopperud HM, Øilo M. Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2017;3(1):47-52.
• [28] Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006;22(3):211-222.
• [29] Zissis A, Yannikakis S, Polyzois G, Harrison A. A long term study on residual monomer release from denture materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16(2):81-84.
• [30] Jagger RG. Effect of the curing cycle on some properties of a polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5(2):151-157.
• [31] Umemoto K, Kurata S. Basic study of a new denture base resin applying hydrophobic methacrylate monomer. Dent Mater J 1997;16(1):21-30.
• [32] Axe AS, Varghese R, Bosma M, Kitson N, Bradshaw DJ. Dental health professional recommendation and consumer habits in denture cleansing. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(2):183-188.
• [33] Papadiochou S, Polyzois G. Hygiene practices in removable prosthodontics: A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2018;16(2):179-201.