SPORE MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMICAL AND ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF BRYOPHYTA FROM TURKEY

Year 2018, Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 215 - 223, 01.12.2018

İsmühan Potoğlu Erkara , Filiz Bırgı Onur Koyuncu

https://doi.org/10.1501/commuc_0000000217

Abstract

Turkey is one of the main centers of diversity for the bryophytes. Spore morphology has been useful in taxonomy. This study includes spore morphology of Orthotrichaceae, Grimmiaceae, Encalyptaceae, Hypnaceae, Pottiaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Bryaceae taxa. The aims of this study are to provide a detailed taxonomical, morphological, ecological and paleobotanical characterization of Bryophyta in Turkey. The spores of some Bryophyta taxa were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy for the first time. The apertural region forms a leptoma in all spores. The spore morphology of the examined taxa of the families belonged to granulate, granulate-pliate, verrucate, baculate-verrucate, rugulate, rugulate-verrucate, gemmate types (smooth, finely papillose, warty, coarsely papillose). The spore shape of all studied species was spheroid. The spore wall of the Bryophyta included sclerine and intine. The examined species of mosses belonged to three habitat types: corticolous, saxicolous and terrestrial type. We also discussed the taxonomical and ecological implications of the some Bryophyta with respect to its spore morphology

Keywords

Bryophyta, Musci, Spore morphology, Ecology, Taxonomy, Turkey.

References

• [1] M. Alatas, The Moss (Musci) Flora of Yenice forest and Keltepe. Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master Dissertation, (2006) 220.
• [2] B. Ascı, T. Ceter, N.M. Pınar, H. Colgecen and B. Cetin, Spore morphology of some Turkish Tortula and Syntrichia species (Pottiaceae Schimp., Bryophyta). The Herb Journal of Systematic. Botany, 17(2), (2010) 165-180.
• [3] S. Blackmoreand, S.H. Barnes, Pollen and Spores. Patterns of Diversification. The Systematics Association, 44, (1991) 391.
• [4] A. Boros, M. Járai-Komlódi, Z. Toth and S. Nilson, An atlas of recent European Bryophyte Spores, (1993), Budapest, Akademiai Kiado.
• [5] R.C. Brown and B.E. Lemmon, Sporogenesis in Bryophytes. Advanced Bryology, 3, (1988) 159-223.
• [6] I.C. Caldeira, A.P. Luizi-Ponzo and V.G. Esteves, Palynology of selected species of Fissidens (Hedw.). Plant Systematic Evolution, 299, (2013) 187- 195.
• [7] J.S. Carrion, M.J. Cano and J. Guerra, Spore morphology in the moss genus Pterygoneurum Jur. (Pottiaceae). Nova Hedwigia, 61(3-4), (1995) 481-496.
• [8] G. Erdtman, Pollen and spore morphology/plant taxonomy; Gymnospermae, Pteridophyta, Bryophyta (illustrations), Stockholm, Almquist and Wiksell, (1958) 151.
• [9] B. Estebanez, C. Alfayate and E. Ron, Observations on spore ultrastructure in six species of Grimmia (Bryopsida). Grana, 36, (1997) 347-357.
• [10] R. Gambardella, F. Alfano, M. Gargiulo and C. Squillacioti, Studies on the sporogenous Lineage in the moss Timmiella barbuloides IX. development of the tapetum. Annals of Botany, 73 (1994) 369-375.
• [11] B. Goffinet and A.J. Shaw, Bryophyte Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2009) 565.
• [12] R.O. Kapp, O.K. Davis and J.E. King, Pollen and spores, the American association of stratigraphic palynologists foundation, 2nd Ed. USA, Texas A&M University, (2000) 279.
• [13] H. Kurschner, Life strategies and adaptations in Bryophytes from the Near and Middle East. Turkish Journal of Botany, 28, (2004) 73-84.
• [14] H. Kurschner and A. Erdag, Bryophytes of Turkey: an annotated reference list of the species with synonyms from the recent literature and an annotated list of Turkish bryological literature. Turkish Journal of Botany, 29, (2005) 95-154.
• [15] A.P. Luizi-Ponzo and O.M. Barth, Spore morphology of some Bruchiaceae species (Bryophyta) from Brazil. Grana, 37, (1998) 222-227.
• [16] A.P. Luizi-Ponzoand O.M. Barth, Spore morphology of some Dicranaceae species (Bryophyta) from Brazil. Grana, 38, (1999) 42-49.
• [17] I. Potoglu Erkara and F. Savaroglu, Spore morphology of some Brachytheciaceae Schimp. species (Bryophyta) from Turkey. Nordic Journal of Botany, 25, (2007)194-198.
• [18] I. Potoglu Erkara, Spore Morphology, Taxonomical and ecological importance of some Encalyptaceae Schimp. species (Bryophyta) from Turkey. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 46(1), (2017) 139-145.
• [19] I. Potoglu Erkara, F. Savaroglu, R. Tan and S. Pehlivan. Investigation of spore morphology of some Pottiaceae (Schimp.) taxa (Bryophyta) in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 49(1), (2017) 265-272.
• [20] W. Punt, S. Blackmore, S. Nilsson and A. Le Thomas, Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Contributions series No: 1, Netherlands, LPP foundation, (1994).
• [21] F. Savaroglu, I. Potoglu Erkara, C. Baycu and M. Alkan, Spore morphology of some Bryaceae Schwagr. species (Bryophyta) from Turkey. International Journal of Engineering Science, 1(2), (2007) 49-54.
• [22] F. Savaroglu and I. Potoglu Erkara, Observations of spore morphology of some Pottiaceae Schimp. species (Bryophyta) in Turkey. Plant Systematic and Evolution, 271, (2008) 93-99.
• [23] F. Savaroglu, Spore Morphology of some Orthotrichaceae Arn. species (Bryophyta) from Turkey. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 44(4), (2015) 499- 506.
• [24] F. Savaroglu, I. Potoglu Erkara and F. Ozcelik, Spore morphology of some Grimmiaceae Arn. species belonging to Moss Flora of Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(3), (2016)1045-1050.