The Relationships Between Religiosity, Empathy, and Driver Behaviors

Year 2020, , 631 - 653, 15.12.2020

Sezai Korkmaz

https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.694393

Cited By: 2

Abstract

There are basic traffic rules as well as rules that must be followed personally and socially. Depending on the drivers, positive and negative behaviors occur in traffic. Because of negative behaviors in traffic, there are loss of life and property, as well as moral/psychological prob-lems. It is seen that moral behavior, empathy and religious values are important in traffic. There are many studies that reveal the relationship between religiousness, traffic behaviors, and empathy. It can be predicted that there are relationships between religiosity, driver behav-ior and empathy. Moreover, according to studies based on correlation relations, it can be stated that those with high religiousness, inner religiosity and empathy scores are more careful and respectful in traffic. Empathic tendencies and religious values might lead to be more civilized, more respectful, and to comply with the traffic rules. The aim of the current study was to analyze the relationship between religiosity, traffic behavior, and empathy. Under the guidance of literature, the following hypotheses were tested: There is a differentiation in traffic errors and violations and positive driver behavior by gender. Positive driver behaviors and traffic errors and violations differ according to the accident rate. There is a statistically positive rela-tionship between religiousness and empathy and positive driver behavior. There is a negative relationship between religiousness and traffic errors and violations. Religiousness predicts empathetic tendencies and positive driver behavior. Empathy mediates in the relationship between religiosity and positive driver behavior.
Research methods of the current study were documentation and relational survey method. Data collection was made by means of various social media and messengers etc. A total of 201 volunteers participated in the current study. According to gender, 104 (51.7%) of the partici-pants were men and 97 (48.3%) were women. The age range of the sample varied between 20 and 58 and the average age is 33. 199 (99%) of the participants had a driver’s license, 2 (1%) had not any driver’s license. In terms of accident rates, 100 of the participants (49.8%) had an accident, 101 of them (50.2%) never had an accident. The data was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS program. Descriptive analysis, t-test, Pearson correlation test, multiple regression based on structural equation model, intermediate variable analysis, and reliability analysis tests were performed in the analyzes. The questionnaire of the study consisted of the personal infor-mation form and the consent form created by the researcher, the driver behavior scale devel-oped by Reason et al., adapted to Turkish by Sümer et al., the positive driver behavior scale developed by Özkan and Lajunen, the empathic tendency scale developed by Dökmen and the religiousness scale developed by Ayten.
According to gender, there is a statistically significant differentiation in terms of traffic errors and violations (t (199) = 4.731; p <0.05) and positive driver behaviors (t (170.9) = - 3.190; p <0.05). Based on the average of errors and violations by gender, men (m = 2.02) make more errors and violations than women (m = 1.72). In terms of positive driver behavior, women (m = 4.05) show more positive behavior than men (m = 3.78). According to the data in Table 2, there is a statistically significant difference in errors and violations, according to accident rates (t (199) = - 3.382; p <0.05), while no statistically significant differences are observed in positive driver behaviors. Therefore, those who had an accident (m = 1.99) make more mistakes and violations than those who had no accident (m = 1.77). A statistically significant correlation exists between religiousness and empathic tendency (r (201) =, 265; p <0.01). Religiousness and empathic tendency positively affect each other. However, there is no significant relationship between religiousness and other variables. While there is a significant and positive (r (201) =, 378; p <0.01) relationship between the empathic tendency and positive driver behavior, there is a significant and negative relationship between empathic tendency and traffic errors and violations (r (201) = -, 200; p <0.01). Regarding the findings of the regression analysis, religiosi-ty predicts the empathic tendency (β =, 265; p <0.001). Religiosity estimates .265 of the em-pathic tendency. Religiousness has no effect on predicting driver behavior. The study reveals that religiousness does not have a regression relationship with positive driver behaviors (β =, 110; p> 0.001), and errors and violations (β = -, 120; p> 0.001). Regarding the regression weights according to the structural equation model, in terms of relationships between varia-bles, it is not statistically eligible to analyze the mediator.

Keywords

Psychology of Religion, Religiosity, Traffic Rules, Driver Behaviors, Empathy

Dindarlık, Empati ve Sürücü Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkiler

Abstract

Kişisel ve toplumsal olarak uyulması gereken kurallar olduğu gibi trafikte de belli kurallar bulunmaktadır. Sürücülere bağlı olarak trafikte olumlu ve olumsuz davranışlar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Trafikte olumsuz davranışlar sonucunda can ve mal kaybı yaşandığı gibi manevi/psikolojik sorunlar da ortaya çıkmaktadır. Yapılan çalışmalara bakıldığında dindarlık ile trafik davranışları ve dindarlık ile empati arasında ilişki olduğunu ortaya koyan birçok çalışma bulunmaktadır. Sürücü davranışları ile dindarlık ve empati arasında da ilişkiler olduğu öngörülebilir. Dahası korelasyon ilişkilerine dayalı olarak yapılan çalışmalarda dindarlık, içsel dindarlık ve empati puanları yüksek olanların trafikte daha dikkatli ve saygılı olacağını ön kabul olarak ifade edebiliriz. Kişilerin, trafikte daha medeni, daha saygılı olmalarının ve trafik kurallarına daha fazla uymaları empatiye ve dini/ahlaki değerlere dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada dindarlık ile trafik davranışları ve empati arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Literatüre dayalı olarak şu hipotezler oluşturulmuştur: Cinsiyete göre olumlu sürücü davranışlarında ve trafikte hata ve ihlallerde farklılaşma vardır. Kaza yapma oranına göre olumlu sürücü davranışları ve trafikte hata ve ihlaller farklılaşmaktadır. Dindarlık, empatik eğilim ve olumlu sürücü davranışları arasında pozitif yönde ilişki vardır. Dindarlık ile trafikte hata ve ihlaller arasında negatif yönde ilişki vardır. Dindarlık, empatik eğilim ve olumlu sürücü davranışlarını yordamaktadır. Dindarlık ile olumlu sürücü davranışları arasındaki ilişkide empati aracı değişken görevi görmektedir.
Araştırmada metot olarak dokümantasyon yöntemi ve ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Anket verileri, Kahramanmaraş ili esas olmak üzere internet (Google dokümanlar) aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Farklı sosyal medya ve iletişim araçlarına başvurulmuştur. 

Keywords

Din Psikolojisi, Dindarlık, Trafik Kuralları, Sürücü Davranışları, Empati

References

• Allport, Gordon W. & Ross, J. Michael. “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5/4 (1967), 432-443.
• Arslan, Hasan. “Trafikte Dini Tutum ve Davranışın Rolü”. Din ve Trafik (Trafikte Sosyal ve Psikolojik Davranışlar, Hoşgörü, Eğitim, Ahlak, Kültür, Denetim ve İstatistikler). ed. Fikret Karaman. 39-57. Malatya: İnönü Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakütesi, 2016.
• Ayten, Ali. Empati ve Din: Türkiye’de Yardımlaşma ve Dindarlık Üzerine Psiko-Sosyal Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2013.
• Ayten, Ali. “Kimlik ve Din: İngiltere’deki Türk Gençleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”. Çukurova Üni-versitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (ÇÜİFD) 12/2 (2012), 101-119.
• Baxter, James S. vd. “Social Facilitation and Driver Behaviour”. British Journal of Psychology 81/3 (1990), 351-360.
• Berkowitz, Leonard. “Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis: Examination and Reformulation”. Psychological Bulletin 106/1 (1989), 59-73.
• Cüceloğlu, Doğan. İnsan ve Davranışı. İstanbul: Remzi Yayınevi, 37. Baskı, 2018.
• Dökmen, Üstün. “Empatinin Yeni Bir Modele Dayanılarak Ölçülmesi ve Psikodrama ile Gelişti-rilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi 21/1 (1988), 001-034.
• Hökelekli, Hayati. Din Psikolojisine Giriş. İstanbul: Dem Yayınları, 2010.
• Kohut, Heinz. The Analysis of The Self : A Systematic Approach To The Psychoanalytic Treat-ment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1971.
• Köse, Saffet. “Sosyal Bir Sorun Olarak Trafik (Kur’an-Sünnet Bağlamında Bir Yaklaşım)”. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi 15/1 (2010), 13-38.
• McDonald, James E. vd. “Effects of Religiosity, Forgiveness, and Spousal Empathy on Marital Adjustment”. Marriage & Family Review 54/4 (2018), 393-416.
• Mizuno, Yukimi vd. “Religiosity And Psychological Resilience in Patients With Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: An International Cross-Sectional Study”. Acta Psychiatrica Scan-dinavica 137/4 (2018), 316-327.
• Nabipour, Amir Reza vd. “The Relationship Between Religion and The On-Road Behaviour of Adolescents In Iran”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavi-our 29 (2015), 113-120.
• Nordfjærn, Trond & Şimşekoǧlu, Özlem. “Empathy, Conformity, and Cultural Factors Related to Aberrant Driving Behaviour in A Sample Of Urban Turkish Drivers”. Safety Science 68 (2014), 55-64.
• Owsley, Cynthia vd. “Impact of Impulsiveness, Venturesomeness, and Empathy on Driving By Older Adults”. Journal of Safety Research 34/4 (2003), 353-359.
• Özcan, Zeynep. “Empati ve Dindarlık Arasındaki İlişki”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmala-rı Dergisi 5/8 (2016), 2758-2781.
• Özkan, Türker & Lajunen, Timo. “A New Addition To DBQ: Positive Driver Behaviours Scale”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8/4-5 (2005), 355-368.
• Parker, Dianne vd. “Driving Errors, Driving Violations and Accident İnvolvement”. Ergonomics 38/5 (1995), 1036- 1048.
• Reason, James vd. “Errors And Violations on The Roads: A Real Distinction?” Ergonomics 33/10-11 (1990), 1315- 1332.
• Reis, Luana Araújo dos & Menezes, Tânia Maria de Oliva. “Religiosity and Spirituality As Resi-lience Strategies Among Long-Living Older Adults in Their Daily Lives”. Revista Brasile-ira de Enfermagem 70/4 (2017), 761-766.
• Şahin, Adem. “Ergenlerde Dindarlık ve Empati”. Marife 1/1 (2008), 149-166.
• Shinar, David. “Aggressive Driving: The Contribution of The Drivers and The Situation”. Trans-portation Research
• Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 1/2 (1998), 137-160.
• Sümer, Nebi vd. “Sürücü Davranışlarının Kaza Riskindeki Rolü: İhlaller ve Hatalar”. Ankara: Uluslararası Trafik ve Yol Guvenliği Kongresi. 1-10. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, 2002.
• Sungur, İslim vd. “Türkiye’deki Trafik Kazalarının Analizi”. Ankara Medical Journal 14/3 ( 2014), 114-124.
• Tarhan, Nevzat. İnanç Psikolojisi: Ruh, Beyin ve Akıl Üçgeninde İnsanoğlu. İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları, 2011.
• THB, Trafik Hizmetleri Başkanlığı. “İstatistikler”. Erişim 22 Ocak 2020. http://trafik.gov.tr/kurumlar/trafik.gov.tr/04- Istatistik/Genel/Arac_Surucuu.pdf.
• Uysal, Veysel. “Gençlerde Empati, Anne-Baba Tutumları ve Dindarlık”. Dokuz Eylül Ünivesitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Psikoloji Özel Sayısı (2016), 7-40.
• Uysal, Veysel. “Gençlerde Empati̇ Eği̇li̇mi̇, Anne-Baba Tutumları ve Dindarlık”. DEUIFD 1/1 (2016), 7-40.
• Winter, Joost de & Dodou, Dimitra. “The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire As A Predictor Of Accidents: A Meta- Analysis”. Journal of Safety Research 41/6 (2010), 463-470.
• Yıldırım, Zümrüt. Religiousness,Conservatism, and Their Relationship With Traffic Behaviour. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Social Sciences, Mas-ter Thesis, 2007.